口腔卫生临床前器械选择和顺序调查。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE International journal of dental hygiene Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1111/idh.12862
Justine E Ponce
{"title":"口腔卫生临床前器械选择和顺序调查。","authors":"Justine E Ponce","doi":"10.1111/idh.12862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the selection and sequence of dental hygiene instruments taught during dental hygiene pre-clinical education in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exempt status was received from the University of New Mexico's IRB (ID 21-336). A survey was developed with questions to be answered involving decisions for clinical teaching and sequencing on various assessment and implementation instruments during pre-clinic education. The instrument was 11 questions with multiple choice, ranking and short answer. A survey link was included through email invitation and successfully sent to 301 accredited dental hygiene programme directors in the United States. Results were collected and analysed through descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three of the invited participants completed the survey, a 14% response rate. Almost half (n = 24) of the participants chose to teach the periodontal probe first and 19 chose the explorer. Twenty-five participants selected they teach the sickle scalers first, 14 teach the universal curette scalers first and 4 teach the Gracey curette scalers first. All participants teach electronically powered scalers with 33 teaching after hand instrumentation and 8 before.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study emphasise that educators teach clinical instrumentation from professional opinion, but no attestation specifically suggests the use of evidence-based pedagogical standards for clinical teaching. Dental hygiene programmes could benefit from further research on pre-clinic instrument selection and sequencing as a way of standardised clinical teaching. These clinical implications could advance the science for standardised teaching of clinical instrumentation and sequencing in dental hygiene education.</p>","PeriodicalId":13791,"journal":{"name":"International journal of dental hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Survey of Dental Hygiene Pre-Clinic Instrumentation Selection and Sequence.\",\"authors\":\"Justine E Ponce\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/idh.12862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess the selection and sequence of dental hygiene instruments taught during dental hygiene pre-clinical education in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exempt status was received from the University of New Mexico's IRB (ID 21-336). A survey was developed with questions to be answered involving decisions for clinical teaching and sequencing on various assessment and implementation instruments during pre-clinic education. The instrument was 11 questions with multiple choice, ranking and short answer. A survey link was included through email invitation and successfully sent to 301 accredited dental hygiene programme directors in the United States. Results were collected and analysed through descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three of the invited participants completed the survey, a 14% response rate. Almost half (n = 24) of the participants chose to teach the periodontal probe first and 19 chose the explorer. Twenty-five participants selected they teach the sickle scalers first, 14 teach the universal curette scalers first and 4 teach the Gracey curette scalers first. All participants teach electronically powered scalers with 33 teaching after hand instrumentation and 8 before.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study emphasise that educators teach clinical instrumentation from professional opinion, but no attestation specifically suggests the use of evidence-based pedagogical standards for clinical teaching. Dental hygiene programmes could benefit from further research on pre-clinic instrument selection and sequencing as a way of standardised clinical teaching. These clinical implications could advance the science for standardised teaching of clinical instrumentation and sequencing in dental hygiene education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of dental hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of dental hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12862\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of dental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估美国牙科卫生临床前教育中教授的牙科卫生器械的选择和顺序:新墨西哥大学的 IRB(ID 21-336)授予了豁免资格。新墨西哥大学获得了 IRB(ID 21-336)的豁免资格。调查问卷的问题涉及临床教学决策以及临床前教育中各种评估和实施工具的排序。调查问卷共有 11 个问题,包括多项选择、排序和简答。调查链接通过电子邮件发送给美国 301 位经认证的牙科卫生课程主任。调查结果通过描述性统计进行收集和分析:43名受邀参与者完成了调查,回复率为14%。近一半的参与者(n = 24)选择先教授牙周探针,19 人选择了探针。25 位参与者选择先教授镰刀式洁牙机,14 位先教授通用刮匙洁牙机,4 位先教授格雷斯刮匙洁牙机。所有参与者都在教授电子动力洁牙器,其中 33 人在手动器械操作后教授,8 人在手动器械操作前教授:这项研究的结果强调,教育者在教授临床器械时要从专业角度出发,但没有任何证明特别建议在临床教学中使用循证教学标准。口腔卫生课程可以从临床前器械选择和排序的进一步研究中获益,以此作为标准化临床教学的一种方式。这些临床意义可以推动口腔卫生教育中临床器械和排序标准化教学的科学发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Survey of Dental Hygiene Pre-Clinic Instrumentation Selection and Sequence.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the selection and sequence of dental hygiene instruments taught during dental hygiene pre-clinical education in the United States.

Methods: Exempt status was received from the University of New Mexico's IRB (ID 21-336). A survey was developed with questions to be answered involving decisions for clinical teaching and sequencing on various assessment and implementation instruments during pre-clinic education. The instrument was 11 questions with multiple choice, ranking and short answer. A survey link was included through email invitation and successfully sent to 301 accredited dental hygiene programme directors in the United States. Results were collected and analysed through descriptive statistics.

Results: Forty-three of the invited participants completed the survey, a 14% response rate. Almost half (n = 24) of the participants chose to teach the periodontal probe first and 19 chose the explorer. Twenty-five participants selected they teach the sickle scalers first, 14 teach the universal curette scalers first and 4 teach the Gracey curette scalers first. All participants teach electronically powered scalers with 33 teaching after hand instrumentation and 8 before.

Conclusions: Results from this study emphasise that educators teach clinical instrumentation from professional opinion, but no attestation specifically suggests the use of evidence-based pedagogical standards for clinical teaching. Dental hygiene programmes could benefit from further research on pre-clinic instrument selection and sequencing as a way of standardised clinical teaching. These clinical implications could advance the science for standardised teaching of clinical instrumentation and sequencing in dental hygiene education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of dental hygiene
International journal of dental hygiene DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Dental Hygiene is the official scientific peer-reviewed journal of the International Federation of Dental Hygienists (IFDH). The journal brings the latest scientific news, high quality commissioned reviews as well as clinical, professional and educational developmental and legislative news to the profession world-wide. Thus, it acts as a forum for exchange of relevant information and enhancement of the profession with the purpose of promoting oral health for patients and communities. The aim of the International Journal of Dental Hygiene is to provide a forum for exchange of scientific knowledge in the field of oral health and dental hygiene. A further aim is to support and facilitate the application of new knowledge into clinical practice. The journal welcomes original research, reviews and case reports as well as clinical, professional, educational and legislative news to the profession world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Construct Validity of the Orientation to Life Questionnaire in a General Adult Population in Norway and Its Association with Self-Reported General and Oral Health. Dental Hygienists' Readiness to Perform Resin Infiltrations: A Qualitative Study From Finland. Gingivitis Control in Children, Adolescents and Young Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease by a Need-Related Programme: A Randomised Clinical Trial. Sex Differences in Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer-A Prospective Study. The Experiences of Implementing a Near-Peer Teaching Scheme Into an Undergraduate Dental Hygiene and Dental Therapy Programme at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1