Ying Cao , Jichao Zhu , Bingshao Liang , Yan Guo , Li Ding , Fupin Hu
{"title":"在对常见呼吸道病原体进行测试时,评估 20 µg 左旋肉碱片剂与肉汤微量稀释法的效果。","authors":"Ying Cao , Jichao Zhu , Bingshao Liang , Yan Guo , Li Ding , Fupin Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of the disk diffusion test with lefamulin 20 µg compared with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 572 clinical stains, including 240 <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, 211 <em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em>, and 121 <em>Haemophilus influenzae</em>, isolated from 71 medical centres from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network in 2020. BMD method and disk diffusion methods were performed according to CLSI. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very ME (VME) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Lefamulin showed potent activity against <em>S. aureus, S. pneumoniae,</em> and <em>H. influenzae</em>. Using the BMD method, lefamulin inhibited 97.1% of <em>S. aureus</em> isolates at 0.25 mg/L; seven isolates were not susceptible. For <em>S. pneumoniae</em> and <em>H. influenzae,</em> the percentage of susceptibility to lefamulin was 100% and no non-susceptible strains were found in this study. Compared with the reference BMD method, the CA of the lefamulin 20 µg disk testing was 99.8% (571/572), with 14.3% (1/7) VME and no ME. In our study, VME was determined in <em>S. aureus</em>. For <em>S. pneumoniae</em> and <em>H. influenzae</em>, the VME was not determined due to the lack of lefamulin non-susceptible strains.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The lefamulin 20 µg disk diffusion testing showed excellent CA and ME with the reference BMD method for <em>S. aureus, S. pneumoniae,</em> and <em>H. influenzae</em>. The VME exceeding CLSI recommendations may be a bias due to fewer lefamulin non-susceptible isolates. Our results suggest that lefamulin non-susceptible isolates detected by disk diffusion should be confirmed by the reference BMD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","volume":"64 6","pages":"Article 107366"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of lefamulin 20 µg disk versus broth microdilution when tested against common respiratory pathogens\",\"authors\":\"Ying Cao , Jichao Zhu , Bingshao Liang , Yan Guo , Li Ding , Fupin Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the performance of the disk diffusion test with lefamulin 20 µg compared with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 572 clinical stains, including 240 <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>, 211 <em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em>, and 121 <em>Haemophilus influenzae</em>, isolated from 71 medical centres from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network in 2020. BMD method and disk diffusion methods were performed according to CLSI. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very ME (VME) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Lefamulin showed potent activity against <em>S. aureus, S. pneumoniae,</em> and <em>H. influenzae</em>. Using the BMD method, lefamulin inhibited 97.1% of <em>S. aureus</em> isolates at 0.25 mg/L; seven isolates were not susceptible. For <em>S. pneumoniae</em> and <em>H. influenzae,</em> the percentage of susceptibility to lefamulin was 100% and no non-susceptible strains were found in this study. Compared with the reference BMD method, the CA of the lefamulin 20 µg disk testing was 99.8% (571/572), with 14.3% (1/7) VME and no ME. In our study, VME was determined in <em>S. aureus</em>. For <em>S. pneumoniae</em> and <em>H. influenzae</em>, the VME was not determined due to the lack of lefamulin non-susceptible strains.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The lefamulin 20 µg disk diffusion testing showed excellent CA and ME with the reference BMD method for <em>S. aureus, S. pneumoniae,</em> and <em>H. influenzae</em>. The VME exceeding CLSI recommendations may be a bias due to fewer lefamulin non-susceptible isolates. Our results suggest that lefamulin non-susceptible isolates detected by disk diffusion should be confirmed by the reference BMD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 107366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924002826\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857924002826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的方法:从2020年中国抗菌药物监测网(CHINET)的71个医疗中心分离的572个临床污点,包括240个金黄色葡萄球菌、211个肺炎链球菌和121个流感嗜血杆菌。根据 CLSI 标准,采用肉汤微量稀释法和磁盘扩散法进行检测。计算了分类一致性(CA)、主要误差(ME)和极主要误差(VME):结果:来法菌素对金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎双球菌和流感嗜血杆菌具有强效活性。采用肉汤微稀释法,在 0.25 mg/L 的浓度下,乐福霉素可抑制 97.1%的金黄色葡萄球菌分离株;有 7 个分离株对乐福霉素不敏感。对于肺炎双球菌和流感嗜血杆菌,本研究发现它们对来氟霉素的敏感率为 100%,没有发现不敏感的菌株。与参考肉汤微量稀释法相比,乐福霉素 20 µg 磁盘测试的 CA 为 99.8%(571/572),VME 为 14.3%(1/7),无 ME。在我们的研究中,金黄色葡萄球菌被确定为 VME。对于肺炎双球菌和流感嗜血杆菌,由于缺乏对左旋氨霉素不敏感的菌株,因此未确定VME:结论:用参考肉汤微量稀释法对金黄色葡萄球菌、肺炎双球菌和流感嗜血杆菌进行的 20 µg 左旋氨氯地平盘扩散试验显示了极佳的 CA 和 ME 值。VME超过CLSI推荐值可能是由于对来氟霉素不敏感的分离物较少而造成的偏差。我们的结果表明,用盘扩散法检测到的对来福米林不敏感的分离株应通过参考 BMD 进行确认。
Assessment of lefamulin 20 µg disk versus broth microdilution when tested against common respiratory pathogens
Objective
To evaluate the performance of the disk diffusion test with lefamulin 20 µg compared with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) reference broth microdilution (BMD) method.
Methods
A total of 572 clinical stains, including 240 Staphylococcus aureus, 211 Streptococcus pneumoniae, and 121 Haemophilus influenzae, isolated from 71 medical centres from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network in 2020. BMD method and disk diffusion methods were performed according to CLSI. Categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very ME (VME) were calculated.
Results
Lefamulin showed potent activity against S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae. Using the BMD method, lefamulin inhibited 97.1% of S. aureus isolates at 0.25 mg/L; seven isolates were not susceptible. For S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, the percentage of susceptibility to lefamulin was 100% and no non-susceptible strains were found in this study. Compared with the reference BMD method, the CA of the lefamulin 20 µg disk testing was 99.8% (571/572), with 14.3% (1/7) VME and no ME. In our study, VME was determined in S. aureus. For S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, the VME was not determined due to the lack of lefamulin non-susceptible strains.
Conclusions
The lefamulin 20 µg disk diffusion testing showed excellent CA and ME with the reference BMD method for S. aureus, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae. The VME exceeding CLSI recommendations may be a bias due to fewer lefamulin non-susceptible isolates. Our results suggest that lefamulin non-susceptible isolates detected by disk diffusion should be confirmed by the reference BMD.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents is a peer-reviewed publication offering comprehensive and current reference information on the physical, pharmacological, in vitro, and clinical properties of individual antimicrobial agents, covering antiviral, antiparasitic, antibacterial, and antifungal agents. The journal not only communicates new trends and developments through authoritative review articles but also addresses the critical issue of antimicrobial resistance, both in hospital and community settings. Published content includes solicited reviews by leading experts and high-quality original research papers in the specified fields.