沟通观点,建立复原力:安全-II 引导护理专业人员与客户之间的反思性对话,作为发展产科综合护理的一部分。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2024-10-22 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.8588
Sarah R Lips, Jolanda C G Boxem-Tiemessen, Anna M Ligthart, Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker-Warnaar, Martine C de Bruijne, Corine J M Verhoeven, Petra Verdonk, Ank de Jonge
{"title":"沟通观点,建立复原力:安全-II 引导护理专业人员与客户之间的反思性对话,作为发展产科综合护理的一部分。","authors":"Sarah R Lips, Jolanda C G Boxem-Tiemessen, Anna M Ligthart, Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker-Warnaar, Martine C de Bruijne, Corine J M Verhoeven, Petra Verdonk, Ank de Jonge","doi":"10.5334/ijic.8588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limitations of traditional structures and approaches to further enhance patient safety, satisfaction, and systemic sustainability in healthcare, are becoming increasingly visible. Embedding reflexivity is a proposed strategy to promote progress. We aimed to explore the potential of creating reflexive spaces for promoting integration and client-centeredness in maternity care specifically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this participatory action research (PAR), two multidisciplinary and multiorganizational groups of maternity care professionals and clients (n = 28) from two Dutch regions, participated in 'reflexive dialogues'. Cases were discussed from a Safety-II perspective. In total, 22 meetings took place from 2020-2022, mostly online. Additionally, 23 participants were interviewed. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants were generally positive about the reflexive dialogues and Safety-II approach. They felt both safe and challenged to critically reflect on their own and each other's care practices. Exchanging perspectives, experiences, and approaches fostered trust, well-being, and repertoire, and through this, resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By structurally stimulating, facilitating, and embedding Safety-II guided reflexive dialogues between professionals and clients from multiple organizations and disciplines, healthcare leaders could promote resilience and reinforce the transformation towards integrated, relation-centered maternity care.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"24 4","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Perspectives, Building Resilience: Safety-II Guided Reflexive Dialogues Between Care Professionals and Clients as Part of Developing Integrated Maternity Care.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah R Lips, Jolanda C G Boxem-Tiemessen, Anna M Ligthart, Tjerk Jan Schuitmaker-Warnaar, Martine C de Bruijne, Corine J M Verhoeven, Petra Verdonk, Ank de Jonge\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/ijic.8588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limitations of traditional structures and approaches to further enhance patient safety, satisfaction, and systemic sustainability in healthcare, are becoming increasingly visible. Embedding reflexivity is a proposed strategy to promote progress. We aimed to explore the potential of creating reflexive spaces for promoting integration and client-centeredness in maternity care specifically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this participatory action research (PAR), two multidisciplinary and multiorganizational groups of maternity care professionals and clients (n = 28) from two Dutch regions, participated in 'reflexive dialogues'. Cases were discussed from a Safety-II perspective. In total, 22 meetings took place from 2020-2022, mostly online. Additionally, 23 participants were interviewed. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants were generally positive about the reflexive dialogues and Safety-II approach. They felt both safe and challenged to critically reflect on their own and each other's care practices. Exchanging perspectives, experiences, and approaches fostered trust, well-being, and repertoire, and through this, resilience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By structurally stimulating, facilitating, and embedding Safety-II guided reflexive dialogues between professionals and clients from multiple organizations and disciplines, healthcare leaders could promote resilience and reinforce the transformation towards integrated, relation-centered maternity care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8588\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.8588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统结构和方法在进一步提高患者安全、满意度和医疗保健系统可持续性方面的局限性日益明显。嵌入反思性是一项促进进步的拟议战略。我们的目标是探索创造反思空间的潜力,以促进产科护理的整合和以客户为中心:在这项参与式行动研究(PAR)中,来自荷兰两个地区的两组多学科、多组织的孕产妇护理专业人员和客户(n = 28)参与了 "反思性对话"。从安全 II 的角度对案例进行了讨论。2020-2022 年期间,共举行了 22 次会议,大部分是在线会议。此外,还对 23 名参与者进行了访谈。对数据进行了录音、转录和主题分析:参与者普遍对反思性对话和安全-II 方法持肯定态度。他们在批判性地反思自己和对方的护理实践时既感到安全,又面临挑战。交流观点、经验和方法增进了信任、幸福感和经验,并由此增强了复原力:通过结构性地激励、促进和嵌入安全 II 引导的来自多个组织和学科的专业人员与客户之间的反思性对话,医疗保健领导者可以促进复原力并加强向综合的、以关系为中心的孕产妇护理转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging Perspectives, Building Resilience: Safety-II Guided Reflexive Dialogues Between Care Professionals and Clients as Part of Developing Integrated Maternity Care.

Background: Limitations of traditional structures and approaches to further enhance patient safety, satisfaction, and systemic sustainability in healthcare, are becoming increasingly visible. Embedding reflexivity is a proposed strategy to promote progress. We aimed to explore the potential of creating reflexive spaces for promoting integration and client-centeredness in maternity care specifically.

Methods: In this participatory action research (PAR), two multidisciplinary and multiorganizational groups of maternity care professionals and clients (n = 28) from two Dutch regions, participated in 'reflexive dialogues'. Cases were discussed from a Safety-II perspective. In total, 22 meetings took place from 2020-2022, mostly online. Additionally, 23 participants were interviewed. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.

Findings: Participants were generally positive about the reflexive dialogues and Safety-II approach. They felt both safe and challenged to critically reflect on their own and each other's care practices. Exchanging perspectives, experiences, and approaches fostered trust, well-being, and repertoire, and through this, resilience.

Conclusions: By structurally stimulating, facilitating, and embedding Safety-II guided reflexive dialogues between professionals and clients from multiple organizations and disciplines, healthcare leaders could promote resilience and reinforce the transformation towards integrated, relation-centered maternity care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
期刊最新文献
Lessons Learned From the Implementation of an Integrated Health and Social Care Child and Family Hub - a Case Study. Examining Macro-Level Barriers and Facilitators to Scaling Up Integrated Care from a Complexity Perspective: A Multi-Case Study of Cambodia, Slovenia, and Belgium. Process Evaluations for the Scale-Up of Complex Interventions - a Scoping Review. Cost of "Ideal Minimum Integrated Care" for Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension Patients in Cambodia Context: Provider Perspective. Addressing Child and Adolescent Mental Health Problems in the Community. Evaluation of a Consultation and Advise Team for Assessment, Support and Referral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1