针对特定患者的深度学习跟踪框架,用于核磁共振成像引导放疗中的实时二维靶标定位。

Elia Lombardo, Laura Velezmoro, Sebastian N Marschner, Moritz Rabe, Claudia Tejero, Christianna I Papadopoulou, Zhuojie Sui, Michael Reiner, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Christopher Kurz, Marco Riboldi, Guillaume Landry
{"title":"针对特定患者的深度学习跟踪框架,用于核磁共振成像引导放疗中的实时二维靶标定位。","authors":"Elia Lombardo, Laura Velezmoro, Sebastian N Marschner, Moritz Rabe, Claudia Tejero, Christianna I Papadopoulou, Zhuojie Sui, Michael Reiner, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Christopher Kurz, Marco Riboldi, Guillaume Landry","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We propose a tumor tracking framework for 2D cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on a pair of deep learning (DL) models relying on patient-specific (PS) training.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>The chosen DL models are: (1) an image registration transformer and (2) an auto-segmentation convolutional neural network (CNN). We collected over 1,400,000 cine MRI frames from 219 patients treated on a 0.35 T MRI-linac plus 7500 frames from additional 35 patients that were manually labeled and subdivided into fine-tuning, validation, and testing sets. The transformer was first trained on the unlabeled data (without segmentations). We then continued training (with segmentations) either on the fine-tuning set or for PS models based on 8 randomly selected frames from the first 5 seconds of each patient's cine MRI. The PS auto-segmentation CNN was trained from scratch with the same 8 frames for each patient, without pre-training. Furthermore, we implemented B-spline image registration as a conventional model, as well as different baselines. Output segmentations of all models were compared on the testing set using the Dice similarity coefficient, the 50% and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD<sub>50%</sub>/HD<sub>95%</sub>), and the root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PS transformer and CNN significantly outperformed all other models, achieving a median (interquartile range) dice similarity coefficient of 0.92 (0.03)/0.90 (0.04), HD<sub>50%</sub> of 1.0 (0.1)/1.0 (0.4) mm, HD<sub>95%</sub> of 3.1 (1.9)/3.8 (2.0) mm, and root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction of 0.7 (0.4)/0.9 (1.0) mm on the testing set. Their inference time was about 36/8 ms per frame and PS fine-tuning required 3 min for labeling and 8/4 min for training. The transformer was better than the CNN in 9/12 patients, the CNN better in 1/12 patients, and the 2 PS models achieved the same performance on the remaining 2/12 testing patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For targets in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, we found 2 PS DL models to provide accurate real-time target localization during MRI-guided radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Specific Deep Learning Tracking Framework for Real-Time 2D Target Localization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Elia Lombardo, Laura Velezmoro, Sebastian N Marschner, Moritz Rabe, Claudia Tejero, Christianna I Papadopoulou, Zhuojie Sui, Michael Reiner, Stefanie Corradini, Claus Belka, Christopher Kurz, Marco Riboldi, Guillaume Landry\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We propose a tumor tracking framework for 2D cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on a pair of deep learning (DL) models relying on patient-specific (PS) training.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>The chosen DL models are: (1) an image registration transformer and (2) an auto-segmentation convolutional neural network (CNN). We collected over 1,400,000 cine MRI frames from 219 patients treated on a 0.35 T MRI-linac plus 7500 frames from additional 35 patients that were manually labeled and subdivided into fine-tuning, validation, and testing sets. The transformer was first trained on the unlabeled data (without segmentations). We then continued training (with segmentations) either on the fine-tuning set or for PS models based on 8 randomly selected frames from the first 5 seconds of each patient's cine MRI. The PS auto-segmentation CNN was trained from scratch with the same 8 frames for each patient, without pre-training. Furthermore, we implemented B-spline image registration as a conventional model, as well as different baselines. Output segmentations of all models were compared on the testing set using the Dice similarity coefficient, the 50% and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD<sub>50%</sub>/HD<sub>95%</sub>), and the root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PS transformer and CNN significantly outperformed all other models, achieving a median (interquartile range) dice similarity coefficient of 0.92 (0.03)/0.90 (0.04), HD<sub>50%</sub> of 1.0 (0.1)/1.0 (0.4) mm, HD<sub>95%</sub> of 3.1 (1.9)/3.8 (2.0) mm, and root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction of 0.7 (0.4)/0.9 (1.0) mm on the testing set. Their inference time was about 36/8 ms per frame and PS fine-tuning required 3 min for labeling and 8/4 min for training. The transformer was better than the CNN in 9/12 patients, the CNN better in 1/12 patients, and the 2 PS models achieved the same performance on the remaining 2/12 testing patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For targets in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, we found 2 PS DL models to provide accurate real-time target localization during MRI-guided radiotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.021\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们提出了一种基于一对深度学习(DL)模型的二维 cine MRI 肿瘤追踪框架,该框架依赖于特定患者(PS)训练:所选的深度学习模型是1)图像配准变换器;2)自动分割卷积神经网络(CNN)。我们收集了在 0.35 T 核磁共振成像仪上接受治疗的 219 名患者的超过 1,400,000 个核磁共振成像帧,以及另外 35 名患者的 7,500 个帧,对这些帧进行了人工标注,并将其细分为微调集、验证集和测试集。转换器首先在无标记数据(无分割)上进行训练。然后,我们继续在微调集上进行训练(有分割),或根据从每位患者核磁共振成像前 5 秒中随机选取的 8 个帧对 PS 模型进行训练(有分割)。而 PS 自动分割 CNN 则是在不进行预训练的情况下,使用每个患者相同的八个帧从头开始训练。此外,我们还将 B-样条曲线图像配准作为一个传统模型,并采用了不同的基线。在测试集上,我们使用 Dice 相似性系数(DSC)、50% 和 95% Hausdorff 距离(HD50%/HD95%)以及上下方向目标中心点的均方根误差(RMSESI)对所有模型的输出分割结果进行了比较:PS 变换器和 CNN 的性能明显优于所有其他模型,在测试集上的 DSC 中位数(四分位数间距)为 0.92 (0.03)/0.90 (0.04),HD50% 为 1.0 (0.1)/1.0 (0.4) mm,HD95% 为 3.1 (1.9)/3.8 (2.0) mm,RMSESI 为 0.7 (0.4)/0.9 (1.0) mm。其推理时间约为每帧 36/8 毫秒,PS 微调需要 3 分钟进行标记,8/4 分钟进行训练。变压器在 9/12 例患者中的表现优于 CNN,CNN 在 1/12 例患者中的表现优于变压器,两种 PS 模型在其余 2/12 例测试患者中的表现相同:结论:对于胸部、腹部和骨盆的目标,我们发现两种 PS DL 模型能在磁共振成像引导放疗过程中提供准确的实时目标定位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-Specific Deep Learning Tracking Framework for Real-Time 2D Target Localization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy.

Purpose: We propose a tumor tracking framework for 2D cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on a pair of deep learning (DL) models relying on patient-specific (PS) training.

Methods and materials: The chosen DL models are: (1) an image registration transformer and (2) an auto-segmentation convolutional neural network (CNN). We collected over 1,400,000 cine MRI frames from 219 patients treated on a 0.35 T MRI-linac plus 7500 frames from additional 35 patients that were manually labeled and subdivided into fine-tuning, validation, and testing sets. The transformer was first trained on the unlabeled data (without segmentations). We then continued training (with segmentations) either on the fine-tuning set or for PS models based on 8 randomly selected frames from the first 5 seconds of each patient's cine MRI. The PS auto-segmentation CNN was trained from scratch with the same 8 frames for each patient, without pre-training. Furthermore, we implemented B-spline image registration as a conventional model, as well as different baselines. Output segmentations of all models were compared on the testing set using the Dice similarity coefficient, the 50% and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD50%/HD95%), and the root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction.

Results: The PS transformer and CNN significantly outperformed all other models, achieving a median (interquartile range) dice similarity coefficient of 0.92 (0.03)/0.90 (0.04), HD50% of 1.0 (0.1)/1.0 (0.4) mm, HD95% of 3.1 (1.9)/3.8 (2.0) mm, and root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction of 0.7 (0.4)/0.9 (1.0) mm on the testing set. Their inference time was about 36/8 ms per frame and PS fine-tuning required 3 min for labeling and 8/4 min for training. The transformer was better than the CNN in 9/12 patients, the CNN better in 1/12 patients, and the 2 PS models achieved the same performance on the remaining 2/12 testing patients.

Conclusions: For targets in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, we found 2 PS DL models to provide accurate real-time target localization during MRI-guided radiotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
期刊最新文献
Spine SBRT in Geriatric Patients: Implications of Age and Dose on Iatrogenic Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk. The association of linear energy transfer and dose with radiation necrosis after pencil beam scanning proton therapy in pediatric posterior fossa tumors: Association of dose and LET with radiation necrosis. Data-Driven Volumetric CT Image Generation from Surface Structures using a Patient-Specific Deep Leaning Model. Phase II trial of consolidative stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with metastatic oncogene-driven non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Docetaxel/cisplatin chemotherapy followed by pelvic radiation therapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer after staging surgery: a phase II study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1