医疗保险竞争性招标计划中慢性阻塞性肺病患者的辅助氧气使用、效果和支出。

IF 22.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5738
Kevin I Duan, Emmi Obara, Edwin S Wong, Joshua M Liao, Amber K Sabbatini, Lucas M Donovan, Laura J Spece, Laura C Feemster, David H Au
{"title":"医疗保险竞争性招标计划中慢性阻塞性肺病患者的辅助氧气使用、效果和支出。","authors":"Kevin I Duan, Emmi Obara, Edwin S Wong, Joshua M Liao, Amber K Sabbatini, Lucas M Donovan, Laura J Spece, Laura C Feemster, David H Au","doi":"10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Medicare Competitive Bidding Program (CBP), a policy that reduced durable medical equipment prices, was implemented starting in 2011. Legislation introduced in 2024 aims to remove supplemental oxygen from the CBP because of concerns that recent decreases in oxygen prescribing are due to lower prices set by the CBP, which may have decreased supply and, in turn, limited oxygen access for patients with chronic lung diseases. However, low-value prescribing of oxygen is also prevalent in practice, and decreased oxygen prescription rates may not have necessarily caused harm. Little is known about the association of the CBP with patient use, outcomes, or spending.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between the 2011 and 2013 implementation of the CBP and supplemental oxygen use, clinical outcomes, and supplemental oxygen spending among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used a difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the association between implementation of the CBP and the outcomes of interest. Patients aged 65 to 100 years with COPD living in CBP areas were compared with those living in areas where the CBP was not yet or never implemented. The study included 100% fee-for-service Medicare data of beneficiaries enrolled between July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015. The data analysis was performed between June 6, 2023, and August 16, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The 2011 and 2013 implementation cycles of the Medicare CBP.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were new prescriptions of oxygen during a 6-month period among beneficiaries with COPD and discontinuation of oxygen during a 6-month period among beneficiaries with COPD previously prescribed oxygen. Secondary outcomes included switches between oxygen types (gas, liquid, or concentrator), all-cause mortality, all-cause unplanned hospitalizations, COPD hospitalizations, and mean monthly allowed charges (total spending) over a 6-month period. The analysis was performed using the Callaway-Sant'Anna method, a dynamic DID model for policies with staggered implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5 753 308 Medicare beneficiaries with COPD (mean [SD] age, 79.2 [8.4] years; 55.1% female), 25.9% received supplemental oxygen for at least one 6-month period during the study. The CBP was not associated with differential changes in new oxygen prescribing (DID estimate, -0.19 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.45 to 2.08 percentage points) or oxygen discontinuations (DID estimate, -0.77 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.15 to 6.60 percentage points). Similarly, differential changes were not observed in the secondary outcomes of oxygen switches (DID estimate, -0.04 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.37 percentage points), all-cause mortality (DID estimate, 0.16 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.52 to 7.84 percentage points), all-cause unplanned hospitalizations (DID estimate, -0.20 percentage points; 95% CI, -10.94 to 10.53 percentage points), or COPD hospitalizations (DID estimate, -0.04 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.57 to 2.48 percentage points). Differential changes were observed for mean monthly allowed charges (DID estimate, -$326.22; 95% CI, -$434.76 to -$217.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, among beneficiaries with COPD, the Medicare CBP was associated with differentially lower spending but not differential changes in oxygen use or clinical outcomes. This study did not find evidence supporting ongoing policy efforts to remove supplemental oxygen from the CBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14714,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":22.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supplemental Oxygen Use, Outcomes, and Spending in Patients With COPD in the Medicare Competitive Bidding Program.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin I Duan, Emmi Obara, Edwin S Wong, Joshua M Liao, Amber K Sabbatini, Lucas M Donovan, Laura J Spece, Laura C Feemster, David H Au\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The Medicare Competitive Bidding Program (CBP), a policy that reduced durable medical equipment prices, was implemented starting in 2011. Legislation introduced in 2024 aims to remove supplemental oxygen from the CBP because of concerns that recent decreases in oxygen prescribing are due to lower prices set by the CBP, which may have decreased supply and, in turn, limited oxygen access for patients with chronic lung diseases. However, low-value prescribing of oxygen is also prevalent in practice, and decreased oxygen prescription rates may not have necessarily caused harm. Little is known about the association of the CBP with patient use, outcomes, or spending.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between the 2011 and 2013 implementation of the CBP and supplemental oxygen use, clinical outcomes, and supplemental oxygen spending among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used a difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the association between implementation of the CBP and the outcomes of interest. Patients aged 65 to 100 years with COPD living in CBP areas were compared with those living in areas where the CBP was not yet or never implemented. The study included 100% fee-for-service Medicare data of beneficiaries enrolled between July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015. The data analysis was performed between June 6, 2023, and August 16, 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The 2011 and 2013 implementation cycles of the Medicare CBP.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcomes were new prescriptions of oxygen during a 6-month period among beneficiaries with COPD and discontinuation of oxygen during a 6-month period among beneficiaries with COPD previously prescribed oxygen. Secondary outcomes included switches between oxygen types (gas, liquid, or concentrator), all-cause mortality, all-cause unplanned hospitalizations, COPD hospitalizations, and mean monthly allowed charges (total spending) over a 6-month period. The analysis was performed using the Callaway-Sant'Anna method, a dynamic DID model for policies with staggered implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5 753 308 Medicare beneficiaries with COPD (mean [SD] age, 79.2 [8.4] years; 55.1% female), 25.9% received supplemental oxygen for at least one 6-month period during the study. The CBP was not associated with differential changes in new oxygen prescribing (DID estimate, -0.19 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.45 to 2.08 percentage points) or oxygen discontinuations (DID estimate, -0.77 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.15 to 6.60 percentage points). Similarly, differential changes were not observed in the secondary outcomes of oxygen switches (DID estimate, -0.04 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.37 percentage points), all-cause mortality (DID estimate, 0.16 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.52 to 7.84 percentage points), all-cause unplanned hospitalizations (DID estimate, -0.20 percentage points; 95% CI, -10.94 to 10.53 percentage points), or COPD hospitalizations (DID estimate, -0.04 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.57 to 2.48 percentage points). Differential changes were observed for mean monthly allowed charges (DID estimate, -$326.22; 95% CI, -$434.76 to -$217.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, among beneficiaries with COPD, the Medicare CBP was associated with differentially lower spending but not differential changes in oxygen use or clinical outcomes. This study did not find evidence supporting ongoing policy efforts to remove supplemental oxygen from the CBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":22.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5738\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5738","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:医疗保险竞争性招标计划 (CBP) 是一项降低耐用医疗设备价格的政策,于 2011 年开始实施。2024 年提出的立法旨在将补充氧气从 CBP 中移除,因为人们担心最近氧气处方的减少是由于 CBP 规定的较低价格造成的,这可能会减少供应,进而限制慢性肺病患者获得氧气的机会。然而,低价值的氧气处方在实践中也很普遍,氧气处方率的下降不一定会造成伤害。人们对 CBP 与患者使用、治疗效果或支出之间的关系知之甚少:研究慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者在 2011 年和 2013 年实施 CBP 与补充氧气的使用、临床结果和补充氧气支出之间的关系:这项队列研究采用差分法(DID)来评估 CBP 的实施与相关结果之间的关系。居住在 CBP 地区的 65-100 岁慢性阻塞性肺病患者与居住在 CBP 尚未实施或从未实施地区的患者进行了比较。研究纳入了 2009 年 7 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间登记的 100%医疗保险付费服务受益人数据。数据分析在 2023 年 6 月 6 日至 2024 年 8 月 16 日期间进行。研究对象:2011 年和 2013 年医疗保险 CBP 实施周期:主要结果是慢性阻塞性肺病受益人在 6 个月内新开的氧气处方,以及慢性阻塞性肺病受益人在 6 个月内停用氧气的情况。次要结果包括氧气类型(气体、液体或浓缩器)之间的转换、全因死亡率、全因非计划住院率、慢性阻塞性肺病住院率以及 6 个月内平均每月允许费用(总支出)。分析采用卡拉韦-桑塔纳方法,这是一种针对交错实施政策的动态 DID 模型:在 5 753 308 名患有慢性阻塞性肺病的医疗保险受益人中(平均 [SD] 年龄为 79.2 [8.4] 岁;55.1% 为女性),25.9% 的人在研究期间至少有 6 个月接受了补充氧气治疗。CBP 与新开氧气处方(DID 估计值,-0.19 个百分点;95% CI,-2.45 至 2.08 个百分点)或停用氧气(DID 估计值,-0.77 个百分点;95% CI,-8.15 至 6.60 个百分点)的差异变化无关。同样,在氧气转换(DID 估计值,-0.04 个百分点;95% CI,-0.44 至 0.37 个百分点)、全因死亡率(DID 估计值,0.16 个百分点;95% CI,-7.52 至 7.84 个百分点)、全因死亡率(DID 估计值,-0.77 个百分点;95% CI,-8.15 至 6.60 个百分点)等次要结果中也未观察到差异变化。84 个百分点)、全因非计划住院(DID 估计值,-0.20 个百分点;95% CI,-10.94 至 10.53 个百分点)或慢性阻塞性肺病住院(DID 估计值,-0.04 个百分点;95% CI,-2.57 至 2.48 个百分点)。月平均允许费用也出现了不同程度的变化(DID 估计值,-326.22 美元;95% CI,-434.76 美元至-217.68 美元):在本研究中,在慢性阻塞性肺病受益人中,医疗保险 CBP 与不同程度的支出降低有关,但与氧气使用或临床结果的不同变化无关。本研究没有发现证据支持目前从 CBP 中取消补充氧气的政策努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supplemental Oxygen Use, Outcomes, and Spending in Patients With COPD in the Medicare Competitive Bidding Program.

Importance: The Medicare Competitive Bidding Program (CBP), a policy that reduced durable medical equipment prices, was implemented starting in 2011. Legislation introduced in 2024 aims to remove supplemental oxygen from the CBP because of concerns that recent decreases in oxygen prescribing are due to lower prices set by the CBP, which may have decreased supply and, in turn, limited oxygen access for patients with chronic lung diseases. However, low-value prescribing of oxygen is also prevalent in practice, and decreased oxygen prescription rates may not have necessarily caused harm. Little is known about the association of the CBP with patient use, outcomes, or spending.

Objective: To examine the association between the 2011 and 2013 implementation of the CBP and supplemental oxygen use, clinical outcomes, and supplemental oxygen spending among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used a difference-in-differences (DID) method to evaluate the association between implementation of the CBP and the outcomes of interest. Patients aged 65 to 100 years with COPD living in CBP areas were compared with those living in areas where the CBP was not yet or never implemented. The study included 100% fee-for-service Medicare data of beneficiaries enrolled between July 1, 2009, and December 31, 2015. The data analysis was performed between June 6, 2023, and August 16, 2024.

Exposure: The 2011 and 2013 implementation cycles of the Medicare CBP.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes were new prescriptions of oxygen during a 6-month period among beneficiaries with COPD and discontinuation of oxygen during a 6-month period among beneficiaries with COPD previously prescribed oxygen. Secondary outcomes included switches between oxygen types (gas, liquid, or concentrator), all-cause mortality, all-cause unplanned hospitalizations, COPD hospitalizations, and mean monthly allowed charges (total spending) over a 6-month period. The analysis was performed using the Callaway-Sant'Anna method, a dynamic DID model for policies with staggered implementation.

Results: Among 5 753 308 Medicare beneficiaries with COPD (mean [SD] age, 79.2 [8.4] years; 55.1% female), 25.9% received supplemental oxygen for at least one 6-month period during the study. The CBP was not associated with differential changes in new oxygen prescribing (DID estimate, -0.19 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.45 to 2.08 percentage points) or oxygen discontinuations (DID estimate, -0.77 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.15 to 6.60 percentage points). Similarly, differential changes were not observed in the secondary outcomes of oxygen switches (DID estimate, -0.04 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.37 percentage points), all-cause mortality (DID estimate, 0.16 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.52 to 7.84 percentage points), all-cause unplanned hospitalizations (DID estimate, -0.20 percentage points; 95% CI, -10.94 to 10.53 percentage points), or COPD hospitalizations (DID estimate, -0.04 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.57 to 2.48 percentage points). Differential changes were observed for mean monthly allowed charges (DID estimate, -$326.22; 95% CI, -$434.76 to -$217.68).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, among beneficiaries with COPD, the Medicare CBP was associated with differentially lower spending but not differential changes in oxygen use or clinical outcomes. This study did not find evidence supporting ongoing policy efforts to remove supplemental oxygen from the CBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Internal Medicine
JAMA Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
43.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
371
期刊介绍: JAMA Internal Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal committed to advancing the field of internal medicine worldwide. With a focus on four core priorities—clinical relevance, clinical practice change, credibility, and effective communication—the journal aims to provide indispensable and trustworthy peer-reviewed evidence. Catering to academics, clinicians, educators, researchers, and trainees across the entire spectrum of internal medicine, including general internal medicine and subspecialties, JAMA Internal Medicine publishes innovative and clinically relevant research. The journal strives to deliver stimulating articles that educate and inform readers with the latest research findings, driving positive change in healthcare systems and patient care delivery. As a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed medical publications, JAMA Internal Medicine plays a pivotal role in shaping the discourse and advancing patient care in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Are Students Ready to Run Student-Run Clinics? Risk of Liver Injury With Potentially Hepatotoxic Drugs. Risk of Liver Injury With Potentially Hepatotoxic Drugs-Reply. Social Isolation and Mortality in Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Work Requirements and Safety-Net Program Participation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1