高密度脂蛋白胆固醇外流能力与冠心病患者长期预后的关系:一项 Meta 分析。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.5551/jat.65171
Itaru Hisauchi, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Kota Yamada, Tomoaki Ukaji, Masatoshi Shimura, Yohei Tamura, Yuki Kondo, Taro Takeyama, Kahoko Mori, Miona Arai, Yuichi Hori, Shiro Nakahara, Yuji Itabashi, Sayuki Kobayashi, Isao Taguchi
{"title":"高密度脂蛋白胆固醇外流能力与冠心病患者长期预后的关系:一项 Meta 分析。","authors":"Itaru Hisauchi, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Kota Yamada, Tomoaki Ukaji, Masatoshi Shimura, Yohei Tamura, Yuki Kondo, Taro Takeyama, Kahoko Mori, Miona Arai, Yuichi Hori, Shiro Nakahara, Yuji Itabashi, Sayuki Kobayashi, Isao Taguchi","doi":"10.5551/jat.65171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to determine whether baseline high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) at the time of coronary angiography (CAG) could serve as a prognostic marker for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were used for data collection. As of April 2024, 2,871 studies have been identified. Clinical studies comparing MACEs over an observational interval exceeding 12 months in patients with angiographically defined CAD with estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of MACEs in the higher or top-quartile HDL-CEC (H-HDL-CEC) group compared with the lower or bottom-quartile HDL-CEC (L-HDL-CEC) group, after adjusting for six confounding variables, including HDL-C, were included. HRs of 1) overall cardiovascular outcomes, composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, any coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality (Model-1), and 2) cardiovascular outcomes excluding all-cause mortality from Model-1 (Model-2), compared between the L-HDL-CEC and H-HDL-CEC groups, were estimated using a random-effects model, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In five studies, 5,725 patients with CAD with a mean observational interval of 4.9 years were included. The H-HDL-CEC group had significantly lower risks for both estimates (Model-1: HR: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.63 [p=0.0005], and I<sup>2</sup>=59.8% [p=0.04]; Model-2: HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13-0.60 [p=0.0013], and I<sup>2</sup>=64% [p=0.04]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between the baseline HDL-CECs on CAG and long-term MACEs in CAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between the High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and the Long-term Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Itaru Hisauchi, Tetsuya Ishikawa, Kota Yamada, Tomoaki Ukaji, Masatoshi Shimura, Yohei Tamura, Yuki Kondo, Taro Takeyama, Kahoko Mori, Miona Arai, Yuichi Hori, Shiro Nakahara, Yuji Itabashi, Sayuki Kobayashi, Isao Taguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.5551/jat.65171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aimed to determine whether baseline high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) at the time of coronary angiography (CAG) could serve as a prognostic marker for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were used for data collection. As of April 2024, 2,871 studies have been identified. Clinical studies comparing MACEs over an observational interval exceeding 12 months in patients with angiographically defined CAD with estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of MACEs in the higher or top-quartile HDL-CEC (H-HDL-CEC) group compared with the lower or bottom-quartile HDL-CEC (L-HDL-CEC) group, after adjusting for six confounding variables, including HDL-C, were included. HRs of 1) overall cardiovascular outcomes, composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, any coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality (Model-1), and 2) cardiovascular outcomes excluding all-cause mortality from Model-1 (Model-2), compared between the L-HDL-CEC and H-HDL-CEC groups, were estimated using a random-effects model, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In five studies, 5,725 patients with CAD with a mean observational interval of 4.9 years were included. The H-HDL-CEC group had significantly lower risks for both estimates (Model-1: HR: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.63 [p=0.0005], and I<sup>2</sup>=59.8% [p=0.04]; Model-2: HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13-0.60 [p=0.0013], and I<sup>2</sup>=64% [p=0.04]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between the baseline HDL-CECs on CAG and long-term MACEs in CAD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.65171\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.65171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在通过系统综述和荟萃分析,确定冠状动脉造影术(CAG)时的基线高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇外排能力(CEC)是否可作为冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者未来主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的预后标志:方法:使用 MEDLINE、Cochrane 和 Embase 数据库收集数据。截至 2024 年 4 月,共确定了 2871 项研究。纳入的临床研究比较了血管造影确定的 CAD 患者在超过 12 个月的观察间隔内发生的 MACE,并在调整包括 HDL-C 在内的六个混杂变量后,估计了较高或最高四分位数 HDL-CEC (H-HDL-CEC) 组与较低或最低四分位数 HDL-CEC (L-HDL-CEC) 组发生 MACE 的危险比 (HRs)。采用随机效应模型分别估算了1)整体心血管结局、心血管死亡率、心肌梗死、任何冠状动脉血运重建和全因死亡率的复合指数(模型-1)和2)模型-1中排除全因死亡率的心血管结局(模型-2):在五项研究中,共纳入了 5725 名 CAD 患者,平均观察时间间隔为 4.9 年。H-HDL-CEC组在两个估计值中的风险都明显较低(模型-1:HR:0.34,95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.18-0.63 [p]):模型-2:HR:0.28,95% 置信区间[CI]:0.13-0.60 [p=0.0013],I2=64% [p=0.04]):这是首次系统回顾和荟萃分析表明,CAG 的基线 HDL-CECs 与 CAD 患者的长期 MACE 之间存在显著的反向关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between the High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Efflux Capacity and the Long-term Prognosis in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis.

Aim: We aimed to determine whether baseline high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) at the time of coronary angiography (CAG) could serve as a prognostic marker for future major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods: The MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Embase databases were used for data collection. As of April 2024, 2,871 studies have been identified. Clinical studies comparing MACEs over an observational interval exceeding 12 months in patients with angiographically defined CAD with estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of MACEs in the higher or top-quartile HDL-CEC (H-HDL-CEC) group compared with the lower or bottom-quartile HDL-CEC (L-HDL-CEC) group, after adjusting for six confounding variables, including HDL-C, were included. HRs of 1) overall cardiovascular outcomes, composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, any coronary revascularization, and all-cause mortality (Model-1), and 2) cardiovascular outcomes excluding all-cause mortality from Model-1 (Model-2), compared between the L-HDL-CEC and H-HDL-CEC groups, were estimated using a random-effects model, respectively.

Results: In five studies, 5,725 patients with CAD with a mean observational interval of 4.9 years were included. The H-HDL-CEC group had significantly lower risks for both estimates (Model-1: HR: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.63 [p=0.0005], and I2=59.8% [p=0.04]; Model-2: HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.13-0.60 [p=0.0013], and I2=64% [p=0.04]).

Conclusion: This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between the baseline HDL-CECs on CAG and long-term MACEs in CAD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
15.90%
发文量
271
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: JAT publishes articles focused on all aspects of research on atherosclerosis, vascular biology, thrombosis, lipid and metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential on the Long-Term Risk of Recurrent Stroke in Patients with a High Atherosclerotic Burden. Atherosclerotic Diseases in Chronic Kidney Disease. Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol for Secondary Prevention after Minor Stroke. Chronic Disturbed Flow Induces Superficial Erosion-Prone Lesion via Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in a DNA Methyltransferase-Dependent Manner. The Clinical Implication of Pemafibrate, a Novel Selective PPARα Modulator.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1