利用虚拟植入三焦点眼内透镜预测老花眼换镜患者的视觉效果。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of cataract and refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001576
Steven C Schallhorn, Joaquín Fernández, Hakan Kaymak, Mario Gerlach, Dr Friedrich O Kirchner
{"title":"利用虚拟植入三焦点眼内透镜预测老花眼换镜患者的视觉效果。","authors":"Steven C Schallhorn, Joaquín Fernández, Hakan Kaymak, Mario Gerlach, Dr Friedrich O Kirchner","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the reliability of a novel virtual IOL implantation device to predict the outcomes of a trifocal IOL.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical sites in Spain and Germany.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative measurements obtained by the virtual implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) with VirtIOL device (10Lens S.L.U., Terrassa, Spain) were compared to postoperative (month 3) outcomes following the IOL implantation. Evaluated metrics were defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (both in photopic conditions), and visual phenomena (visual angle size of burst and annular pattern) in mesopic conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 45 presbyopic non-cataract patients (mean age 56.16±5.03 years). VirtIOL device reasonably predicted the shape of the defocus curve, especially in the intermediate vision range, but underestimated postoperative visual acuities mainly at the defocus range between +1.0D and -3.5D. The difference between predicted and achieved visual acuity was -0.11±0.13 logMAR (p<0.001) for 0.0D defocus and -0.16±0.15D logMAR (p<0.001) for -2.50D defocus. The shape of the contrast sensitivity curve was almost identical for predicted and achieved measurements, but the device underestimated the values by ≈0.3 logCS units for each spatial frequency. Visual phenomena were similar between the predicted and achieved outcome (predicted vs. achieved: burst pattern 2.65±0.97° vs. 2.74°±0.95°, p=0.63; annular pattern: 0.88±0.42° vs. 0.93±0.49°, p=0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The device reasonably predicted the pattern of measured variables. Visual acuity/contrast sensitivity reduction might be attributed to viewing the objects through a more complex optical system and would need to be accounted for in clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of visual outcomes using virtual implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic lens exchange patients.\",\"authors\":\"Steven C Schallhorn, Joaquín Fernández, Hakan Kaymak, Mario Gerlach, Dr Friedrich O Kirchner\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the reliability of a novel virtual IOL implantation device to predict the outcomes of a trifocal IOL.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Clinical sites in Spain and Germany.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preoperative measurements obtained by the virtual implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) with VirtIOL device (10Lens S.L.U., Terrassa, Spain) were compared to postoperative (month 3) outcomes following the IOL implantation. Evaluated metrics were defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (both in photopic conditions), and visual phenomena (visual angle size of burst and annular pattern) in mesopic conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 45 presbyopic non-cataract patients (mean age 56.16±5.03 years). VirtIOL device reasonably predicted the shape of the defocus curve, especially in the intermediate vision range, but underestimated postoperative visual acuities mainly at the defocus range between +1.0D and -3.5D. The difference between predicted and achieved visual acuity was -0.11±0.13 logMAR (p<0.001) for 0.0D defocus and -0.16±0.15D logMAR (p<0.001) for -2.50D defocus. The shape of the contrast sensitivity curve was almost identical for predicted and achieved measurements, but the device underestimated the values by ≈0.3 logCS units for each spatial frequency. Visual phenomena were similar between the predicted and achieved outcome (predicted vs. achieved: burst pattern 2.65±0.97° vs. 2.74°±0.95°, p=0.63; annular pattern: 0.88±0.42° vs. 0.93±0.49°, p=0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The device reasonably predicted the pattern of measured variables. Visual acuity/contrast sensitivity reduction might be attributed to viewing the objects through a more complex optical system and would need to be accounted for in clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001576\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 评估新型虚拟人工晶体植入设备预测三焦点人工晶体植入结果的可靠性:设计: 前瞻性多中心研究:设计:前瞻性多中心研究:方法:通过虚拟植入AT LISA tri 839MP人工晶体(卡尔蔡司医疗股份公司,德国耶拿,德国)和VirtIOL设备(10Lens S.L.U.,西班牙特拉萨,西班牙)获得的术前测量结果与人工晶体植入术后(第3个月)的结果进行比较。评估指标包括散焦曲线、对比敏感度(两种情况都是在近视条件下)以及中近视条件下的视觉现象(爆裂视角大小和环状模式):研究对象包括 45 名老花眼非白内障患者(平均年龄为 56.16±5.03 岁)。VirtIOL设备合理地预测了散焦曲线的形状,尤其是在中间视力范围,但低估了术后视力,主要是在散焦范围+1.0D到-3.5D之间。预测视力与实际视力之间的差值为-0.11±0.13 logMAR(p 结论:该设备合理地预测了测量变量的模式。视力/对比敏感度降低可能是由于通过更复杂的光学系统观察物体造成的,需要在临床研究中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of visual outcomes using virtual implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens in presbyopic lens exchange patients.

Purpose: To assess the reliability of a novel virtual IOL implantation device to predict the outcomes of a trifocal IOL.

Setting: Clinical sites in Spain and Germany.

Design: Prospective multicenter study.

Methods: Preoperative measurements obtained by the virtual implantation of AT LISA tri 839MP IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) with VirtIOL device (10Lens S.L.U., Terrassa, Spain) were compared to postoperative (month 3) outcomes following the IOL implantation. Evaluated metrics were defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (both in photopic conditions), and visual phenomena (visual angle size of burst and annular pattern) in mesopic conditions.

Results: The study included 45 presbyopic non-cataract patients (mean age 56.16±5.03 years). VirtIOL device reasonably predicted the shape of the defocus curve, especially in the intermediate vision range, but underestimated postoperative visual acuities mainly at the defocus range between +1.0D and -3.5D. The difference between predicted and achieved visual acuity was -0.11±0.13 logMAR (p<0.001) for 0.0D defocus and -0.16±0.15D logMAR (p<0.001) for -2.50D defocus. The shape of the contrast sensitivity curve was almost identical for predicted and achieved measurements, but the device underestimated the values by ≈0.3 logCS units for each spatial frequency. Visual phenomena were similar between the predicted and achieved outcome (predicted vs. achieved: burst pattern 2.65±0.97° vs. 2.74°±0.95°, p=0.63; annular pattern: 0.88±0.42° vs. 0.93±0.49°, p=0.59).

Conclusion: The device reasonably predicted the pattern of measured variables. Visual acuity/contrast sensitivity reduction might be attributed to viewing the objects through a more complex optical system and would need to be accounted for in clinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
期刊最新文献
Ocular Shape of Cataract with Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Case-Control Study. Intraocular Lens Rotational Stability after Cataract Surgery with and without Primary Posterior Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorrhexis. Risk of Zonular Dialysis in Fellow-Eye Cataract Surgeries: A Multicenter Comparative Study. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation in patients with endothelial dystrophy without edema. Analysis of the ESCRS calculator's prediction accuracy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1