腰椎神经减压术后当天出院。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110875
Halil Bulut , Maria Maestre , Daniel Tomey
{"title":"腰椎神经减压术后当天出院。","authors":"Halil Bulut ,&nbsp;Maria Maestre ,&nbsp;Daniel Tomey","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The concept of same-day discharge following lumbar spine surgery for neural elements decompression, introduced in the 1980 s, represents a significant paradigm shift in postoperative care, offering potential benefits in terms of efficiency, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. However, concerns regarding patient safety and complications have persisted. This study aims to assess same-day discharge rates following lumbar spine decompression surgery, identify preoperative predictors, and compare outcomes between same-day discharge and hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use File spanning 2016 to 2021. A total of 58,430 patients undergoing lumbar spine decompression procedures were included. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, with significance determined at p &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences were observed in preoperative factors, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes between patients discharged on the same day and those hospitalized. Preoperative comorbidities, operative time, length of stay, utilization of minimally invasive approaches, and 30-day mortality rates differed significantly between the two groups. Notably, same-day discharge demonstrated superior outcomes, with lower rates of unplanned intubation, readmission, and reoperation compared to hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, same-day discharge following lumbar spine decompression procedures holds promise as a safe and effective practice, offering advantages in terms of patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. Further research and implementation of standardized protocols are warranted to maximize the benefits of same-day discharge while ensuring patient safety and satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 110875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same-day discharge following lumbar spine neural decompression\",\"authors\":\"Halil Bulut ,&nbsp;Maria Maestre ,&nbsp;Daniel Tomey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The concept of same-day discharge following lumbar spine surgery for neural elements decompression, introduced in the 1980 s, represents a significant paradigm shift in postoperative care, offering potential benefits in terms of efficiency, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. However, concerns regarding patient safety and complications have persisted. This study aims to assess same-day discharge rates following lumbar spine decompression surgery, identify preoperative predictors, and compare outcomes between same-day discharge and hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use File spanning 2016 to 2021. A total of 58,430 patients undergoing lumbar spine decompression procedures were included. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, with significance determined at p &lt; 0.05.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences were observed in preoperative factors, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes between patients discharged on the same day and those hospitalized. Preoperative comorbidities, operative time, length of stay, utilization of minimally invasive approaches, and 30-day mortality rates differed significantly between the two groups. Notably, same-day discharge demonstrated superior outcomes, with lower rates of unplanned intubation, readmission, and reoperation compared to hospitalization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In conclusion, same-day discharge following lumbar spine decompression procedures holds promise as a safe and effective practice, offering advantages in terms of patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. Further research and implementation of standardized protocols are warranted to maximize the benefits of same-day discharge while ensuring patient safety and satisfaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586824004144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586824004144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:腰椎神经元减压手术后当天出院的概念于 20 世纪 80 年代提出,代表着术后护理模式的重大转变,在效率、便利性和成本效益方面都具有潜在的优势。然而,有关患者安全和并发症的担忧一直存在。本研究旨在评估腰椎减压术后当日出院率,确定术前预测因素,并比较当日出院和住院治疗的结果:方法:利用美国外科学院国家外科质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)参与者使用文件中2016年至2021年的数据进行了回顾性比较分析。共纳入了58430名接受腰椎减压术的患者。使用 SPSS 软件进行统计分析,以 p 为显著性判定结果:当天出院的患者与住院的患者在术前因素、手术变量和术后结果方面存在显著差异。两组患者的术前合并症、手术时间、住院时间、微创方法的使用以及 30 天死亡率均有显著差异。值得注意的是,与住院治疗相比,当天出院的疗效更佳,意外插管率、再入院率和再次手术率更低:总之,腰椎减压术后当天出院是一种安全有效的做法,在患者预后和医疗资源利用方面具有优势。为了最大限度地发挥当天出院的优势,同时确保患者的安全和满意度,有必要开展进一步的研究并实施标准化方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Same-day discharge following lumbar spine neural decompression

Introduction

The concept of same-day discharge following lumbar spine surgery for neural elements decompression, introduced in the 1980 s, represents a significant paradigm shift in postoperative care, offering potential benefits in terms of efficiency, convenience, and cost-effectiveness. However, concerns regarding patient safety and complications have persisted. This study aims to assess same-day discharge rates following lumbar spine decompression surgery, identify preoperative predictors, and compare outcomes between same-day discharge and hospitalization.

Methods

A retrospective comparative analysis was conducted using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Participant Use File spanning 2016 to 2021. A total of 58,430 patients undergoing lumbar spine decompression procedures were included. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, with significance determined at p < 0.05.

Results

Significant differences were observed in preoperative factors, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes between patients discharged on the same day and those hospitalized. Preoperative comorbidities, operative time, length of stay, utilization of minimally invasive approaches, and 30-day mortality rates differed significantly between the two groups. Notably, same-day discharge demonstrated superior outcomes, with lower rates of unplanned intubation, readmission, and reoperation compared to hospitalization.

Conclusion

In conclusion, same-day discharge following lumbar spine decompression procedures holds promise as a safe and effective practice, offering advantages in terms of patient outcomes and healthcare resource utilization. Further research and implementation of standardized protocols are warranted to maximize the benefits of same-day discharge while ensuring patient safety and satisfaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
期刊最新文献
First-in-human experience of a portable electrical drill with smart autostop for bedside external ventricular drain placement Impact of intraoperative MRI on pediatric epilepsy surgery for focal cortical dysplasia Endoscopic endonasal transmaxillary approach to intraorbital intraconal cavernous venous malformation National trends of Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and Vagus Nerve stimulation (VNS) for refractory epilepsy in adult patients: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample based propensity score matched analysis Effect of blood pressure variability on the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1