眼动仪能否帮助评估非语言脑损伤患者的意识状态?

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.3390/jcm13206227
Grzegorz Zurek, Marek Binder, Bartosz Kunka, Robert Kosikowski, Małgorzata Rodzeń, Danuta Karaś, Gabriela Mucha, Roman Olejniczak, Agata Gorączko, Katarzyna Kujawa, Anna Stachowicz, Karolina Kryś-Noszczyk, Joanna Dryjska, Marcin Dryjski, Jarosław Szczygieł
{"title":"眼动仪能否帮助评估非语言脑损伤患者的意识状态?","authors":"Grzegorz Zurek, Marek Binder, Bartosz Kunka, Robert Kosikowski, Małgorzata Rodzeń, Danuta Karaś, Gabriela Mucha, Roman Olejniczak, Agata Gorączko, Katarzyna Kujawa, Anna Stachowicz, Karolina Kryś-Noszczyk, Joanna Dryjska, Marcin Dryjski, Jarosław Szczygieł","doi":"10.3390/jcm13206227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Developments in eye-tracking technology are opening up new possibilities for diagnosing patients in a state of minimal consciousness because they can provide information on visual behavior, and the movements of the eyeballs are correlated with the patients' level of consciousness. The purpose of this study was to provide validation of a tool, based on eye tracking by comparing the results obtained with the assessment obtained using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). <b>Methods:</b> The mul-ti-center clinical trial was conducted in Poland in 2022-2023. The results of 46 patients who were not able to communicate verbally due to severe brain injury were analyzed in this study. The state of consciousness of patients was assessed using the Minimally Conscious State Detection test (MCSD), installed on an eye tracker and compared to CRS-R. The examinations consisted of performing the MCSD test on patients five times (T1-T5) within 14 days. Collected data were processed based on the FDA and GCP's regulatory requirements. Depending on the nature of the data, the mean and standard deviation, median and lower and upper quartiles, and maximum and minimum values were calculated. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was used to assess the measurement equiva-lence of the methods used. <b>Results:</b> There was no difference between the MCSD and CRS-R in the raw change between T5 and T1 time points, as well as in the total % of points from all time points. The MCSD results from each time point show that at least the first two measurements serve to famil-iarize and adapt the patient to the measurement process, and the third and next measurement should be considered reliable. <b>Conclusions:</b> The results indicated a significant relationship be-tween the scores obtained with MCSD and CRS-R. The results suggest that it seems reasonable to introduce an assessment of the patient's state of consciousness based on eye-tracking technology. The use of modern technology to assess a patient's state of consciousness opens up the opportunity for greater objectivity, as well as a reduction in the workload of qualified personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Eye Tracking Help Assess the State of Consciousness in Non-Verbal Brain Injury Patients?\",\"authors\":\"Grzegorz Zurek, Marek Binder, Bartosz Kunka, Robert Kosikowski, Małgorzata Rodzeń, Danuta Karaś, Gabriela Mucha, Roman Olejniczak, Agata Gorączko, Katarzyna Kujawa, Anna Stachowicz, Karolina Kryś-Noszczyk, Joanna Dryjska, Marcin Dryjski, Jarosław Szczygieł\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13206227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Developments in eye-tracking technology are opening up new possibilities for diagnosing patients in a state of minimal consciousness because they can provide information on visual behavior, and the movements of the eyeballs are correlated with the patients' level of consciousness. The purpose of this study was to provide validation of a tool, based on eye tracking by comparing the results obtained with the assessment obtained using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). <b>Methods:</b> The mul-ti-center clinical trial was conducted in Poland in 2022-2023. The results of 46 patients who were not able to communicate verbally due to severe brain injury were analyzed in this study. The state of consciousness of patients was assessed using the Minimally Conscious State Detection test (MCSD), installed on an eye tracker and compared to CRS-R. The examinations consisted of performing the MCSD test on patients five times (T1-T5) within 14 days. Collected data were processed based on the FDA and GCP's regulatory requirements. Depending on the nature of the data, the mean and standard deviation, median and lower and upper quartiles, and maximum and minimum values were calculated. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was used to assess the measurement equiva-lence of the methods used. <b>Results:</b> There was no difference between the MCSD and CRS-R in the raw change between T5 and T1 time points, as well as in the total % of points from all time points. The MCSD results from each time point show that at least the first two measurements serve to famil-iarize and adapt the patient to the measurement process, and the third and next measurement should be considered reliable. <b>Conclusions:</b> The results indicated a significant relationship be-tween the scores obtained with MCSD and CRS-R. The results suggest that it seems reasonable to introduce an assessment of the patient's state of consciousness based on eye-tracking technology. The use of modern technology to assess a patient's state of consciousness opens up the opportunity for greater objectivity, as well as a reduction in the workload of qualified personnel.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508250/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206227\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目标:眼球追踪技术的发展为诊断意识极弱的患者提供了新的可能性,因为眼球追踪技术可以提供视觉行为的信息,而且眼球的运动与患者的意识水平相关。本研究的目的是通过比较使用昏迷恢复量表-修订版(CRS-R)获得的评估结果,对基于眼动追踪技术的工具进行验证。研究方法多中心临床试验于 2022-2023 年在波兰进行。本研究分析了 46 名因严重脑损伤而无法进行语言交流的患者的结果。患者的意识状态通过安装在眼动追踪器上的微意识状态检测测试(MCSD)进行评估,并与CRS-R进行比较。检查包括在 14 天内对患者进行五次 MCSD 测试(T1-T5)。收集的数据根据 FDA 和 GCP 的法规要求进行处理。根据数据的性质,计算出平均值和标准偏差、中位数和上下四分位数,以及最大值和最小值。使用 Passing-Bablok 回归分析评估所用方法的测量等效性。结果显示MCSD和CRS-R在T5和T1时间点之间的原始变化以及所有时间点的总百分比方面没有差异。每个时间点的 MCSD 结果表明,至少前两次测量可使患者熟悉和适应测量过程,第三次和下一次测量应被视为可靠的测量。结论结果表明,MCSD 和 CRS-R 的得分之间存在重要关系。结果表明,采用眼动追踪技术评估患者的意识状态似乎是合理的。使用现代技术评估病人的意识状态可以提高客观性,并减少专业人员的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Eye Tracking Help Assess the State of Consciousness in Non-Verbal Brain Injury Patients?

Background/Objectives: Developments in eye-tracking technology are opening up new possibilities for diagnosing patients in a state of minimal consciousness because they can provide information on visual behavior, and the movements of the eyeballs are correlated with the patients' level of consciousness. The purpose of this study was to provide validation of a tool, based on eye tracking by comparing the results obtained with the assessment obtained using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Methods: The mul-ti-center clinical trial was conducted in Poland in 2022-2023. The results of 46 patients who were not able to communicate verbally due to severe brain injury were analyzed in this study. The state of consciousness of patients was assessed using the Minimally Conscious State Detection test (MCSD), installed on an eye tracker and compared to CRS-R. The examinations consisted of performing the MCSD test on patients five times (T1-T5) within 14 days. Collected data were processed based on the FDA and GCP's regulatory requirements. Depending on the nature of the data, the mean and standard deviation, median and lower and upper quartiles, and maximum and minimum values were calculated. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was used to assess the measurement equiva-lence of the methods used. Results: There was no difference between the MCSD and CRS-R in the raw change between T5 and T1 time points, as well as in the total % of points from all time points. The MCSD results from each time point show that at least the first two measurements serve to famil-iarize and adapt the patient to the measurement process, and the third and next measurement should be considered reliable. Conclusions: The results indicated a significant relationship be-tween the scores obtained with MCSD and CRS-R. The results suggest that it seems reasonable to introduce an assessment of the patient's state of consciousness based on eye-tracking technology. The use of modern technology to assess a patient's state of consciousness opens up the opportunity for greater objectivity, as well as a reduction in the workload of qualified personnel.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy of Classic Versus Horizontal Incision Techniques in Skin-Reducing Mastectomy: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis. Adherence to Exercise in People with Lung or Head and Neck Cancer: Self-Reported Symptoms and Motivation During Cancer Treatment Need to Be Considered. Analyzing the Impact of Rehabilitation Utilizing Neurofunctional Exercises on the Functional Status of Stroke Patients. Approaches to Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review. Allograft Prosthetic Composite (APC) for Proximal Humeral Bone Deficiency in Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Technical Note and Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1