探索重度抑郁症患者的能力:意大利患者样本中信任、共同决策中的积极作用与症状的相关性。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.3390/jcm13206282
Alessandro Rodolico, Pierfelice Cutrufelli, Giuliana Maccarone, Gabriele Avincola, Carmen Concerto, Alfio Luca Cunsolo, Antonio Di Francesco, Rosaria Furnari, Ludovico Mineo, Federico Salerno, Vincenzo Scuto, Ilenia Tona, Antonino Petralia, Maria Salvina Signorelli
{"title":"探索重度抑郁症患者的能力:意大利患者样本中信任、共同决策中的积极作用与症状的相关性。","authors":"Alessandro Rodolico, Pierfelice Cutrufelli, Giuliana Maccarone, Gabriele Avincola, Carmen Concerto, Alfio Luca Cunsolo, Antonio Di Francesco, Rosaria Furnari, Ludovico Mineo, Federico Salerno, Vincenzo Scuto, Ilenia Tona, Antonino Petralia, Maria Salvina Signorelli","doi":"10.3390/jcm13206282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Empowerment in medicine and psychiatry involves patients gaining control over health-related decisions, improving treatment adherence, outcomes, and satisfaction. This concept is especially significant in psychiatric care due to the complex challenges of mental health conditions, including stigma and impairment of emotional and cognitive functioning. We aim to investigate the correlations between patient trust, decision-making involvement, symptom severity, and perceived empowerment among individuals with Major Depression. <b>Methods</b>: Patients with Major Depressive Disorder were recruited in the \"Policlinico G. Rodolico\" psychiatry outpatient clinic from November 2022 to June 2023. Inclusion criteria: ages 18-65, ability to consent, stable condition, psychiatric medication history, and recent consultation. Exclusion criteria: psychotic features, bipolar disorder, substance abuse, high suicide risk, and severe comorbidities. Measures included the User Scale for Measuring Empowerment in Mental Health Services (SESM), Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS), Clinical Decision-Making Style for Patients (CDMS-P), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Analysis used Kendall's Tau correlation and Two-One-Sided Tests procedure. <b>Results</b>: Seventy-three patients completed the study. No relationship was found between decision-making involvement and perceived empowerment (τ = -0.0625; <i>p</i> = 0.448), or between trust in psychiatrists and empowerment (τ = 0.0747; <i>p</i> = 0.364). An inverse correlation existed between patient involvement in therapy management and trust (τ = -0.2505; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Depression severity inversely correlated with empowerment (τ = -0.2762; <i>p</i> = <.001), but not with trust or decision-making involvement. <b>Conclusions</b>: The lack of significant correlations suggests that decision-making involvement and trust alone may not suffice to enhance empowerment. Trust may encourage patient passivity, while skepticism might drive active involvement. Higher empowerment is associated with less depressive symptoms, highlighting its potential connection with patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Patient Empowerment in Major Depressive Disorder: Correlations of Trust, Active Role in Shared Decision-Making, and Symptomatology in a Sample of Italian Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Rodolico, Pierfelice Cutrufelli, Giuliana Maccarone, Gabriele Avincola, Carmen Concerto, Alfio Luca Cunsolo, Antonio Di Francesco, Rosaria Furnari, Ludovico Mineo, Federico Salerno, Vincenzo Scuto, Ilenia Tona, Antonino Petralia, Maria Salvina Signorelli\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13206282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Empowerment in medicine and psychiatry involves patients gaining control over health-related decisions, improving treatment adherence, outcomes, and satisfaction. This concept is especially significant in psychiatric care due to the complex challenges of mental health conditions, including stigma and impairment of emotional and cognitive functioning. We aim to investigate the correlations between patient trust, decision-making involvement, symptom severity, and perceived empowerment among individuals with Major Depression. <b>Methods</b>: Patients with Major Depressive Disorder were recruited in the \\\"Policlinico G. Rodolico\\\" psychiatry outpatient clinic from November 2022 to June 2023. Inclusion criteria: ages 18-65, ability to consent, stable condition, psychiatric medication history, and recent consultation. Exclusion criteria: psychotic features, bipolar disorder, substance abuse, high suicide risk, and severe comorbidities. Measures included the User Scale for Measuring Empowerment in Mental Health Services (SESM), Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS), Clinical Decision-Making Style for Patients (CDMS-P), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Analysis used Kendall's Tau correlation and Two-One-Sided Tests procedure. <b>Results</b>: Seventy-three patients completed the study. No relationship was found between decision-making involvement and perceived empowerment (τ = -0.0625; <i>p</i> = 0.448), or between trust in psychiatrists and empowerment (τ = 0.0747; <i>p</i> = 0.364). An inverse correlation existed between patient involvement in therapy management and trust (τ = -0.2505; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Depression severity inversely correlated with empowerment (τ = -0.2762; <i>p</i> = <.001), but not with trust or decision-making involvement. <b>Conclusions</b>: The lack of significant correlations suggests that decision-making involvement and trust alone may not suffice to enhance empowerment. Trust may encourage patient passivity, while skepticism might drive active involvement. Higher empowerment is associated with less depressive symptoms, highlighting its potential connection with patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508731/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206282\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206282","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目标:医学和精神病学中的赋权是指患者获得对健康相关决定的控制权,从而提高治疗的依从性、效果和满意度。由于精神健康状况所面临的复杂挑战,包括耻辱感以及情绪和认知功能的损害,这一概念在精神病治疗中尤为重要。我们旨在研究重度抑郁症患者的患者信任度、决策参与度、症状严重程度和感知能力之间的相关性。研究方法2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 6 月期间,在 "Policlinico G. Rodolico "精神病学门诊招募重度抑郁症患者。纳入标准:18-65 岁,能够同意,病情稳定,有精神科用药史,近期就诊过。排除标准:精神病特征、双相情感障碍、药物滥用、高自杀风险和严重合并症。测量指标包括心理健康服务赋权用户量表(SESM)、肿瘤学家信任量表(TiOS)、患者临床决策风格(CDMS-P)和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)。分析采用 Kendall's Tau 相关性和双单侧测试程序。结果73名患者完成了研究。研究发现,参与决策与感知能力(τ = -0.0625;p = 0.448)或对精神科医生的信任与能力(τ = 0.0747;p = 0.364)之间没有关系。患者参与治疗管理与信任之间存在反相关关系(τ = -0.2505;p = 0.002)。抑郁严重程度与赋权成反比(τ = -0.2762; p = 结论:抑郁严重程度与赋权成反比:缺乏明显的相关性表明,仅靠决策参与和信任可能不足以增强能力。信任可能会助长患者的被动性,而怀疑则可能会推动患者积极参与。较高的赋权与较少的抑郁症状相关,突出了其与患者结果的潜在联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring Patient Empowerment in Major Depressive Disorder: Correlations of Trust, Active Role in Shared Decision-Making, and Symptomatology in a Sample of Italian Patients.

Background/Objectives: Empowerment in medicine and psychiatry involves patients gaining control over health-related decisions, improving treatment adherence, outcomes, and satisfaction. This concept is especially significant in psychiatric care due to the complex challenges of mental health conditions, including stigma and impairment of emotional and cognitive functioning. We aim to investigate the correlations between patient trust, decision-making involvement, symptom severity, and perceived empowerment among individuals with Major Depression. Methods: Patients with Major Depressive Disorder were recruited in the "Policlinico G. Rodolico" psychiatry outpatient clinic from November 2022 to June 2023. Inclusion criteria: ages 18-65, ability to consent, stable condition, psychiatric medication history, and recent consultation. Exclusion criteria: psychotic features, bipolar disorder, substance abuse, high suicide risk, and severe comorbidities. Measures included the User Scale for Measuring Empowerment in Mental Health Services (SESM), Trust in Oncologist Scale (TiOS), Clinical Decision-Making Style for Patients (CDMS-P), and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Analysis used Kendall's Tau correlation and Two-One-Sided Tests procedure. Results: Seventy-three patients completed the study. No relationship was found between decision-making involvement and perceived empowerment (τ = -0.0625; p = 0.448), or between trust in psychiatrists and empowerment (τ = 0.0747; p = 0.364). An inverse correlation existed between patient involvement in therapy management and trust (τ = -0.2505; p = 0.002). Depression severity inversely correlated with empowerment (τ = -0.2762; p = <.001), but not with trust or decision-making involvement. Conclusions: The lack of significant correlations suggests that decision-making involvement and trust alone may not suffice to enhance empowerment. Trust may encourage patient passivity, while skepticism might drive active involvement. Higher empowerment is associated with less depressive symptoms, highlighting its potential connection with patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Efficacy of Classic Versus Horizontal Incision Techniques in Skin-Reducing Mastectomy: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis. Adherence to Exercise in People with Lung or Head and Neck Cancer: Self-Reported Symptoms and Motivation During Cancer Treatment Need to Be Considered. Analyzing the Impact of Rehabilitation Utilizing Neurofunctional Exercises on the Functional Status of Stroke Patients. Approaches to Deprescribing Proton Pump Inhibitors in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review. Allograft Prosthetic Composite (APC) for Proximal Humeral Bone Deficiency in Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Technical Note and Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1