沙特阿拉伯 Al-Ahsa 市成年人的急救意识:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-11 DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1952_23
Ahmed Alanazy, Abdullah Alruwaili, Hassan H Al-Hassan, Abdullah Almulhim, Nawaf A Altaher, Abdulraouf S Alhomoud, Mohammed Alduhaish, Sultan N Alanazi, Turki M Alanazi
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯 Al-Ahsa 市成年人的急救意识:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Ahmed Alanazy, Abdullah Alruwaili, Hassan H Al-Hassan, Abdullah Almulhim, Nawaf A Altaher, Abdulraouf S Alhomoud, Mohammed Alduhaish, Sultan N Alanazi, Turki M Alanazi","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1952_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-aid knowledge among the general public is critical for saving lives in medical emergencies before expert care arrives. However, studies show persistent gaps in layperson first-aid capacity worldwide. This study assessed first-aid knowledge and awareness among adults in Al-Ahsa City, Saudi Arabia, to identify strengths and weaknesses to guide tailored interventions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 716 adults recruited through convenience sampling. A structured questionnaire collected sociodemographics and assessed knowledge across 12 first-aid scenarios involving bleeding control, burns, seizures, choking, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Just 59.2% correctly identified direct pressure to stop bleeding, and 61.2% knew proper burn first aid. Only 52% recognized the pediatric CPR compression-to-ventilation ratio (15:2), and 36.2% identified the chest compression rate of 100/min. For choking, 73.9% endorsed abdominal thrusts for children, but only 60.9% knew backslaps for infants. Females scored higher on bleeding (94.5% vs 92.8% correct) and abdominal thrusts (83.6% vs 66.1%), while males were more knowledgeable on burns (70.4% vs 53.8%) and infant choking (81.1% vs 44.7%). Younger and more educated respondents had higher scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Major gaps exist in implementing proper first-aid techniques, especially differentiation by age. Deficits in direct bleeding control, high-quality CPR, and tailored pediatric care represent high-risk knowledge weaknesses in this population. Targeted education programs focused on skill-building in these areas, particularly for higher-risk demographics like the elderly and less educated, are critically needed to strengthen public preparedness and save lives. Findings provide key insights to inform evidence-based interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Awareness of first aid among adults in Al-Ahsa City, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Alanazy, Abdullah Alruwaili, Hassan H Al-Hassan, Abdullah Almulhim, Nawaf A Altaher, Abdulraouf S Alhomoud, Mohammed Alduhaish, Sultan N Alanazi, Turki M Alanazi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1952_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-aid knowledge among the general public is critical for saving lives in medical emergencies before expert care arrives. However, studies show persistent gaps in layperson first-aid capacity worldwide. This study assessed first-aid knowledge and awareness among adults in Al-Ahsa City, Saudi Arabia, to identify strengths and weaknesses to guide tailored interventions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 716 adults recruited through convenience sampling. A structured questionnaire collected sociodemographics and assessed knowledge across 12 first-aid scenarios involving bleeding control, burns, seizures, choking, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Just 59.2% correctly identified direct pressure to stop bleeding, and 61.2% knew proper burn first aid. Only 52% recognized the pediatric CPR compression-to-ventilation ratio (15:2), and 36.2% identified the chest compression rate of 100/min. For choking, 73.9% endorsed abdominal thrusts for children, but only 60.9% knew backslaps for infants. Females scored higher on bleeding (94.5% vs 92.8% correct) and abdominal thrusts (83.6% vs 66.1%), while males were more knowledgeable on burns (70.4% vs 53.8%) and infant choking (81.1% vs 44.7%). Younger and more educated respondents had higher scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Major gaps exist in implementing proper first-aid techniques, especially differentiation by age. Deficits in direct bleeding control, high-quality CPR, and tailored pediatric care represent high-risk knowledge weaknesses in this population. Targeted education programs focused on skill-building in these areas, particularly for higher-risk demographics like the elderly and less educated, are critically needed to strengthen public preparedness and save lives. Findings provide key insights to inform evidence-based interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1952_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1952_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:公众的急救知识对于在专家到达之前挽救生命至关重要。然而,研究表明,全球非专业人员的急救能力一直存在差距。本研究评估了沙特阿拉伯阿赫萨市成年人的急救知识和意识,以找出优势和不足,从而指导有针对性的干预措施:通过便利抽样对 716 名成年人进行了横断面调查。结构化问卷收集了社会人口统计数据,并对涉及出血控制、烧伤、癫痫发作、窒息和心肺复苏(CPR)等 12 种急救情景的知识进行了评估:只有 59.2% 的人正确识别了直接按压止血法,61.2% 的人知道正确的烧伤急救方法。只有 52% 的人知道小儿心肺复苏按压与通气的比例(15:2),36.2% 的人知道胸外按压速度为 100/分钟。对于窒息,73.9% 的人赞同对儿童进行腹部推压,但只有 60.9% 的人知道对婴儿进行拍背。女性对出血(94.5% 对 92.8%)和腹部挤压(83.6% 对 66.1%)的正确率较高,而男性对烧伤(70.4% 对 53.8%)和婴儿窒息(81.1% 对 44.7%)的正确率较高。年龄越小、受教育程度越高的受访者得分越高:结论:在实施正确的急救技术方面存在很大差距,尤其是在年龄差异方面。在直接止血、高质量心肺复苏术和量身定制的儿科护理方面存在的不足是这一人群的高风险知识薄弱环节。我们亟需开展有针对性的教育计划,重点培养这些领域的技能,尤其是针对老年人和受教育程度较低等高风险人群,以加强公众的准备状态并挽救生命。研究结果为循证干预措施提供了重要启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Awareness of first aid among adults in Al-Ahsa City, Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Background: First-aid knowledge among the general public is critical for saving lives in medical emergencies before expert care arrives. However, studies show persistent gaps in layperson first-aid capacity worldwide. This study assessed first-aid knowledge and awareness among adults in Al-Ahsa City, Saudi Arabia, to identify strengths and weaknesses to guide tailored interventions.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 716 adults recruited through convenience sampling. A structured questionnaire collected sociodemographics and assessed knowledge across 12 first-aid scenarios involving bleeding control, burns, seizures, choking, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

Results: Just 59.2% correctly identified direct pressure to stop bleeding, and 61.2% knew proper burn first aid. Only 52% recognized the pediatric CPR compression-to-ventilation ratio (15:2), and 36.2% identified the chest compression rate of 100/min. For choking, 73.9% endorsed abdominal thrusts for children, but only 60.9% knew backslaps for infants. Females scored higher on bleeding (94.5% vs 92.8% correct) and abdominal thrusts (83.6% vs 66.1%), while males were more knowledgeable on burns (70.4% vs 53.8%) and infant choking (81.1% vs 44.7%). Younger and more educated respondents had higher scores.

Conclusions: Major gaps exist in implementing proper first-aid techniques, especially differentiation by age. Deficits in direct bleeding control, high-quality CPR, and tailored pediatric care represent high-risk knowledge weaknesses in this population. Targeted education programs focused on skill-building in these areas, particularly for higher-risk demographics like the elderly and less educated, are critically needed to strengthen public preparedness and save lives. Findings provide key insights to inform evidence-based interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Am I really fat/thin?!" Self-perceived body image and correlation with nutritional status among medical students in Central Gujarat. A clinical comparative study on carbamylated haemoglobin as a surrogate marker to differentiate acute kidney injury from chronic kidney disease. A clinical study of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Maharashtra. A community-based study on health seeking behaviour among NCD patients in rural and urban Tamil Nadu - A convergent mixed method study. A cross-sectional survey of ocular problems after COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers at a teaching hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1