1972-2019 年间印度悉达医学体系的研究成果:文献计量分析指出需要注重数量和质量。

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-11 DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1623_23
Sendhilkumar Muthappan, Rajalakshmi Elumalai, Prakash Muthuperumal, Priyanka Manivannan, Satish Sivaprakasam, Manickam Ponnaiah
{"title":"1972-2019 年间印度悉达医学体系的研究成果:文献计量分析指出需要注重数量和质量。","authors":"Sendhilkumar Muthappan, Rajalakshmi Elumalai, Prakash Muthuperumal, Priyanka Manivannan, Satish Sivaprakasam, Manickam Ponnaiah","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1623_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Siddha system of medicine (SSM) is one of the Indian Systems of Medicine (ISM). In recent times, it has received adequate support from the Indian Ministry of Ayush. Like many such indigenous systems of medicine globally, the SSM is based on its own theoretical principles, philosophy, and methods of practice. Nevertheless, SSM conducts and needs basic and applied research using scientific methods. Such research is evidenced by research publications. In the absence of a review, we did a bibliometric analysis of research publications from SSM for the period of 1972-2019.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used the term \"Siddha\" to retrieve the data from the PubMed database. We retrieved data from the National AYUSH research portal and homepages of institutions mandated to do research in SSM. We abstracted bibliometric information and used Epi info (Version 7.2) for analysis. We described the trends and key characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 2009 retrieved articles, we included 1457 (73%) for analysis. Between 1972 and 2001, the median number of publications per year was three (range: 0-13). Beyond 2012, the publications increased exponentially with an annual growth of 23%. The maximum number of publications (<i>n</i> = 224) was in 2019. Among 43 countries that produced the papers, India topped it (88%). Of 1457, 1.7% (<i>n</i> = 25) of publications from Siddha institutions were indexed in PubMed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A bibliometric review of research output from SSM suggests that the publications have increased in the last two decades. The review recommends improving research output from SSM in terms of quantity and quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"13 9","pages":"3608-3613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504781/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research output from India's Siddha system of medicine during 1972-2019: Bibliometric analysis points need to focus on quantity and quality.\",\"authors\":\"Sendhilkumar Muthappan, Rajalakshmi Elumalai, Prakash Muthuperumal, Priyanka Manivannan, Satish Sivaprakasam, Manickam Ponnaiah\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1623_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Siddha system of medicine (SSM) is one of the Indian Systems of Medicine (ISM). In recent times, it has received adequate support from the Indian Ministry of Ayush. Like many such indigenous systems of medicine globally, the SSM is based on its own theoretical principles, philosophy, and methods of practice. Nevertheless, SSM conducts and needs basic and applied research using scientific methods. Such research is evidenced by research publications. In the absence of a review, we did a bibliometric analysis of research publications from SSM for the period of 1972-2019.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used the term \\\"Siddha\\\" to retrieve the data from the PubMed database. We retrieved data from the National AYUSH research portal and homepages of institutions mandated to do research in SSM. We abstracted bibliometric information and used Epi info (Version 7.2) for analysis. We described the trends and key characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 2009 retrieved articles, we included 1457 (73%) for analysis. Between 1972 and 2001, the median number of publications per year was three (range: 0-13). Beyond 2012, the publications increased exponentially with an annual growth of 23%. The maximum number of publications (<i>n</i> = 224) was in 2019. Among 43 countries that produced the papers, India topped it (88%). Of 1457, 1.7% (<i>n</i> = 25) of publications from Siddha institutions were indexed in PubMed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A bibliometric review of research output from SSM suggests that the publications have increased in the last two decades. The review recommends improving research output from SSM in terms of quantity and quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"3608-3613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504781/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1623_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1623_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:悉达医学体系(SSM)是印度医学体系(ISM)之一。近来,它得到了印度 Ayush 部的充分支持。与全球许多本土医学体系一样,悉达医学体系也有自己的理论原则、哲学和实践方法。尽管如此,SSM 仍使用科学方法开展并需要基础和应用研究。此类研究可以通过研究出版物来证明。在缺乏综述的情况下,我们对 1972-2019 年期间释迦牟尼佛的研究出版物进行了文献计量分析:我们使用 "Siddha "一词从 PubMed 数据库检索数据。我们从国家 AYUSH 研究门户网站和受权从事 SSM 研究的机构的主页上检索数据。我们摘录了文献计量学信息,并使用 Epi info(7.2 版)进行分析。我们对趋势和主要特征进行了描述:在检索到的 2009 篇文章中,我们纳入了 1457 篇(73%)进行分析。1972 年至 2001 年间,每年发表文章的中位数为 3 篇(范围:0-13)。2012 年以后,论文数量呈指数增长,年增长率为 23%。发表论文数量最多的年份是 2019 年(n = 224)。在 43 个发表论文的国家中,印度位居榜首(88%)。在1457篇论文中,有1.7%(n = 25)的Siddha机构出版物被PubMed收录:对锡达医学研究成果的文献计量学审查表明,在过去二十年中,论文数量有所增加。审查建议从数量和质量两方面提高释迦佛学院的研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research output from India's Siddha system of medicine during 1972-2019: Bibliometric analysis points need to focus on quantity and quality.

Introduction: The Siddha system of medicine (SSM) is one of the Indian Systems of Medicine (ISM). In recent times, it has received adequate support from the Indian Ministry of Ayush. Like many such indigenous systems of medicine globally, the SSM is based on its own theoretical principles, philosophy, and methods of practice. Nevertheless, SSM conducts and needs basic and applied research using scientific methods. Such research is evidenced by research publications. In the absence of a review, we did a bibliometric analysis of research publications from SSM for the period of 1972-2019.

Materials and methods: We used the term "Siddha" to retrieve the data from the PubMed database. We retrieved data from the National AYUSH research portal and homepages of institutions mandated to do research in SSM. We abstracted bibliometric information and used Epi info (Version 7.2) for analysis. We described the trends and key characteristics.

Results: Of a total of 2009 retrieved articles, we included 1457 (73%) for analysis. Between 1972 and 2001, the median number of publications per year was three (range: 0-13). Beyond 2012, the publications increased exponentially with an annual growth of 23%. The maximum number of publications (n = 224) was in 2019. Among 43 countries that produced the papers, India topped it (88%). Of 1457, 1.7% (n = 25) of publications from Siddha institutions were indexed in PubMed.

Conclusion: A bibliometric review of research output from SSM suggests that the publications have increased in the last two decades. The review recommends improving research output from SSM in terms of quantity and quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Am I really fat/thin?!" Self-perceived body image and correlation with nutritional status among medical students in Central Gujarat. A clinical comparative study on carbamylated haemoglobin as a surrogate marker to differentiate acute kidney injury from chronic kidney disease. A clinical study of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in western Maharashtra. A community-based study on health seeking behaviour among NCD patients in rural and urban Tamil Nadu - A convergent mixed method study. A cross-sectional survey of ocular problems after COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers at a teaching hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1