经动脉化疗栓塞联合微波消融治疗复发性中型或大型肝细胞癌老年患者

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2024-10-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHC.S455411
Chuxiao Zhang, Yuelan Qin, Yangguang Song, Yingying Liu, Xiaodong Zhu
{"title":"经动脉化疗栓塞联合微波消融治疗复发性中型或大型肝细胞癌老年患者","authors":"Chuxiao Zhang, Yuelan Qin, Yangguang Song, Yingying Liu, Xiaodong Zhu","doi":"10.2147/JHC.S455411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There are insufficient data about the optimal treatment for older patients with recurring medium or large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study intended to assess the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation (TACE-MWA) in an elderly cohort through a retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2011 to 2018, a cohort of individuals (age ≥70 years) with recurrent HCC tumors ranging from 3.1 cm to 7 cm underwent either a combination treatment of TACE and MWA (n = 43) or surgical intervention (n = 33). Using the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) technique, factors of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and rates of major adverse events were analyzed, retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group that underwent surgery had a greater history of alcohol use before treatment (<i>P</i>= 0.001), as well as a higher Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage for the primary tumor before treatment (<i>P</i>= 0.014) and a higher primary tumor location before treatment (<i>P</i>= 0.045). The TACE-MWA group had DFS rates of 86.2%, 68.8%, and 60.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, while the surgery group had rates of 53.0%, 42.2%, and 25.8% at the same time points. In the TACE-MWA treatment group, survival rates at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years post-treatment were recorded as 93.0%, 80.8%, and 65.7%, respectively, while in the surgery group, they were 62.7%, 46.9%, and 42.6%. In the univariate analysis using IPTW, the type of treatment was found to have a significant correlation with disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.86, <i>P</i>=0.017). IPTW multivariate analysis showed that treatment modality (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.79; <i>P</i>= 0.011) was the only significant prognostic factor for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In elderly patients with recurrent 3.1 cm≤ HCC ≤ 7 cm, TACE-WMA was superior to surgery in the respects of DFS and OS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"11 ","pages":"2005-2017"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Microwave Ablation in Elderly Patients with Recurrent Medium or Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Chuxiao Zhang, Yuelan Qin, Yangguang Song, Yingying Liu, Xiaodong Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JHC.S455411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There are insufficient data about the optimal treatment for older patients with recurring medium or large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study intended to assess the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation (TACE-MWA) in an elderly cohort through a retrospective analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2011 to 2018, a cohort of individuals (age ≥70 years) with recurrent HCC tumors ranging from 3.1 cm to 7 cm underwent either a combination treatment of TACE and MWA (n = 43) or surgical intervention (n = 33). Using the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) technique, factors of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and rates of major adverse events were analyzed, retrospectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group that underwent surgery had a greater history of alcohol use before treatment (<i>P</i>= 0.001), as well as a higher Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage for the primary tumor before treatment (<i>P</i>= 0.014) and a higher primary tumor location before treatment (<i>P</i>= 0.045). The TACE-MWA group had DFS rates of 86.2%, 68.8%, and 60.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, while the surgery group had rates of 53.0%, 42.2%, and 25.8% at the same time points. In the TACE-MWA treatment group, survival rates at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years post-treatment were recorded as 93.0%, 80.8%, and 65.7%, respectively, while in the surgery group, they were 62.7%, 46.9%, and 42.6%. In the univariate analysis using IPTW, the type of treatment was found to have a significant correlation with disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.86, <i>P</i>=0.017). IPTW multivariate analysis showed that treatment modality (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.79; <i>P</i>= 0.011) was the only significant prognostic factor for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In elderly patients with recurrent 3.1 cm≤ HCC ≤ 7 cm, TACE-WMA was superior to surgery in the respects of DFS and OS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"2005-2017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512534/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S455411\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHC.S455411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:关于复发的中型或大型肝细胞癌(HCC)老年患者的最佳治疗方法,目前还没有足够的数据。该研究旨在通过回顾性分析评估经导管动脉化疗栓塞联合微波消融术(TACE-MWA)在老年队列中的效果:2011年至2018年,一组复发性HCC肿瘤范围为3.1厘米至7厘米的患者(年龄≥70岁)接受了TACE和MWA联合治疗(43例)或外科干预(33例)。采用逆治疗概率加权(IPTW)技术,对无病生存期(DFS)、总生存期(OS)和主要不良事件发生率等因素进行了回顾性分析:结果:接受手术治疗的患者在治疗前有更多的饮酒史(P= 0.001),治疗前原发肿瘤的巴塞罗那肝癌诊所(BCLC)分期更高(P= 0.014),治疗前原发肿瘤位置更高(P= 0.045)。TACE-MWA组在1年、3年和5年的DFS率分别为86.2%、68.8%和60.4%,而手术组在相同时间点的DFS率分别为53.0%、42.2%和25.8%。在TACE-MWA治疗组中,治疗后1年、3年和5年的生存率分别为93.0%、80.8%和65.7%,而手术组的生存率分别为62.7%、46.9%和42.6%。在使用 IPTW 进行的单变量分析中,发现治疗类型与疾病进展有显著相关性(危险比 [HR] 0.41,95% CI 0.20-0.86,P=0.017)。IPTW多变量分析显示,治疗方式(HR,0.35;95% CI,0.17-0.79;P= 0.011)是OS的唯一重要预后因素:结论:对于复发 3.1 cm≤ HCC ≤ 7 cm 的老年患者,TACE-WMA 在 DFS 和 OS 方面优于手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Microwave Ablation in Elderly Patients with Recurrent Medium or Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Purpose: There are insufficient data about the optimal treatment for older patients with recurring medium or large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The study intended to assess the effect of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with microwave ablation (TACE-MWA) in an elderly cohort through a retrospective analysis.

Methods: From 2011 to 2018, a cohort of individuals (age ≥70 years) with recurrent HCC tumors ranging from 3.1 cm to 7 cm underwent either a combination treatment of TACE and MWA (n = 43) or surgical intervention (n = 33). Using the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) technique, factors of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and rates of major adverse events were analyzed, retrospectively.

Results: The group that underwent surgery had a greater history of alcohol use before treatment (P= 0.001), as well as a higher Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage for the primary tumor before treatment (P= 0.014) and a higher primary tumor location before treatment (P= 0.045). The TACE-MWA group had DFS rates of 86.2%, 68.8%, and 60.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, while the surgery group had rates of 53.0%, 42.2%, and 25.8% at the same time points. In the TACE-MWA treatment group, survival rates at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years post-treatment were recorded as 93.0%, 80.8%, and 65.7%, respectively, while in the surgery group, they were 62.7%, 46.9%, and 42.6%. In the univariate analysis using IPTW, the type of treatment was found to have a significant correlation with disease progression (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.86, P=0.017). IPTW multivariate analysis showed that treatment modality (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.79; P= 0.011) was the only significant prognostic factor for OS.

Conclusion: In elderly patients with recurrent 3.1 cm≤ HCC ≤ 7 cm, TACE-WMA was superior to surgery in the respects of DFS and OS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Construction of a 2.5D Deep Learning Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Multi-View and Multi-Phase CT Images. Unlocking the Potential of Phyto Nanotherapeutics in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment: A Review. Preoperative Noninvasive Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using CT-Based Radiomics Model. Radiofrequency Ablation Therapy versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Naive Hepatocellular Carcinoma (≤5cm): A Retrospective Multi-Center Study. 2,2'- Bipyridine Derivatives Exert Anticancer Effects by Inducing Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HepG2) Cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1