反映血压和动脉僵化的单药联合降压疗法的性别和年龄反应差异。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003901
Jana Brguljan Hitij, Zbigniew Gaciong, Dragan Simić, Péter Vajer, Parounak Zelveian, Irina E Chazova, Bojan Jelaković
{"title":"反映血压和动脉僵化的单药联合降压疗法的性别和年龄反应差异。","authors":"Jana Brguljan Hitij, Zbigniew Gaciong, Dragan Simić, Péter Vajer, Parounak Zelveian, Irina E Chazova, Bojan Jelaković","doi":"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are noticeable sex differences in the treatment response to antihypertensives, with limited data on the response to single pill combinations. The aim of the PRECIOUS trial was to assess the treatment response to perindopril/amlodipine and perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide dual and triple single-pill combination in men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred and forty adults with essential hypertension were assessed in the 16-week interventional, open-label, prospective, international, multicentre trial. Based on the previous antihypertensive therapy, patients were assigned to either perindopril/amlodipine 4/5 mg or perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide 4/5/1.25 mg, with the initial dose up-titrated in 4-week intervals in case of uncontrolled blood pressure. An additional analysis was performed for sex- and age-related differences on the blood pressure response and arterial stiffness in men and women aged 35-74 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women achieved better overall blood pressure control in all age groups, except for the 35-44 age group. Women presented higher average 24 h aortic augmentation indexes than men, but had more pronounced decreasing trends. The pulse wave velocity was only age-dependent, with reductions slightly greater in women. Both the aortic augmentation index and pulse wave velocity were significantly decreased in all groups compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the PRECIOUS trial contribute significant data to the expanding body of evidence on sex differences in hypertension, including the aspect of age-related changes during the life course of women. The differences between same-aged men and women tend to be smaller with advancing age, but with a greater treatment response in women in all age groups for all observed blood pressure parameters and arterial stiffness.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03738761.</p>","PeriodicalId":16043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hypertension","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in sex and age response to single pill combination based antihypertensive therapy reflecting in blood pressure and arterial stiffness.\",\"authors\":\"Jana Brguljan Hitij, Zbigniew Gaciong, Dragan Simić, Péter Vajer, Parounak Zelveian, Irina E Chazova, Bojan Jelaković\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HJH.0000000000003901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There are noticeable sex differences in the treatment response to antihypertensives, with limited data on the response to single pill combinations. The aim of the PRECIOUS trial was to assess the treatment response to perindopril/amlodipine and perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide dual and triple single-pill combination in men and women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred and forty adults with essential hypertension were assessed in the 16-week interventional, open-label, prospective, international, multicentre trial. Based on the previous antihypertensive therapy, patients were assigned to either perindopril/amlodipine 4/5 mg or perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide 4/5/1.25 mg, with the initial dose up-titrated in 4-week intervals in case of uncontrolled blood pressure. An additional analysis was performed for sex- and age-related differences on the blood pressure response and arterial stiffness in men and women aged 35-74 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women achieved better overall blood pressure control in all age groups, except for the 35-44 age group. Women presented higher average 24 h aortic augmentation indexes than men, but had more pronounced decreasing trends. The pulse wave velocity was only age-dependent, with reductions slightly greater in women. Both the aortic augmentation index and pulse wave velocity were significantly decreased in all groups compared to baseline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the PRECIOUS trial contribute significant data to the expanding body of evidence on sex differences in hypertension, including the aspect of age-related changes during the life course of women. The differences between same-aged men and women tend to be smaller with advancing age, but with a greater treatment response in women in all age groups for all observed blood pressure parameters and arterial stiffness.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03738761.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003901\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000003901","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:降压药的治疗反应存在明显的性别差异,而单药组合的反应数据有限。PRECIOUS 试验旨在评估男性和女性对培哚普利/氨氯地平和培哚普利/氨氯地平/吲达帕胺双联和三联单药组合的治疗反应:在这项为期 16 周的介入性、开放标签、前瞻性、国际多中心试验中,对 440 名成人原发性高血压患者进行了评估。根据之前的降压治疗情况,患者被分配到培哚普利/氨氯地平 4/5 毫克或培哚普利/氨氯地平/吲达帕胺 4/5/1.25 毫克的治疗方案中,如果血压未得到控制,初始剂量每 4 周上调一次。此外,还对 35-74 岁男性和女性在血压反应和动脉僵化方面的性别和年龄差异进行了分析:结果:除 35-44 岁年龄组外,所有年龄组的女性都能更好地控制血压。女性 24 小时平均主动脉增强指数高于男性,但下降趋势更明显。脉搏波速度只与年龄有关,女性的下降幅度略大。与基线相比,所有组别的主动脉增强指数和脉搏波速度都有显著下降:PRECIOUS试验的结果为不断扩大的高血压性别差异证据库提供了重要数据,包括女性生命过程中与年龄相关的变化。随着年龄的增长,同龄男性和女性之间的差异趋于缩小,但在所有观察到的血压参数和动脉僵化方面,所有年龄组的女性都有更大的治疗反应:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 识别码 NCT03738761。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in sex and age response to single pill combination based antihypertensive therapy reflecting in blood pressure and arterial stiffness.

Objective: There are noticeable sex differences in the treatment response to antihypertensives, with limited data on the response to single pill combinations. The aim of the PRECIOUS trial was to assess the treatment response to perindopril/amlodipine and perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide dual and triple single-pill combination in men and women.

Methods: Four hundred and forty adults with essential hypertension were assessed in the 16-week interventional, open-label, prospective, international, multicentre trial. Based on the previous antihypertensive therapy, patients were assigned to either perindopril/amlodipine 4/5 mg or perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide 4/5/1.25 mg, with the initial dose up-titrated in 4-week intervals in case of uncontrolled blood pressure. An additional analysis was performed for sex- and age-related differences on the blood pressure response and arterial stiffness in men and women aged 35-74 years.

Results: Women achieved better overall blood pressure control in all age groups, except for the 35-44 age group. Women presented higher average 24 h aortic augmentation indexes than men, but had more pronounced decreasing trends. The pulse wave velocity was only age-dependent, with reductions slightly greater in women. Both the aortic augmentation index and pulse wave velocity were significantly decreased in all groups compared to baseline.

Conclusions: The results of the PRECIOUS trial contribute significant data to the expanding body of evidence on sex differences in hypertension, including the aspect of age-related changes during the life course of women. The differences between same-aged men and women tend to be smaller with advancing age, but with a greater treatment response in women in all age groups for all observed blood pressure parameters and arterial stiffness.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03738761.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hypertension
Journal of Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1389
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hypertension publishes papers reporting original clinical and experimental research which are of a high standard and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of hypertension. The Journal publishes full papers, reviews or editorials (normally by invitation), and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Response to commentary by Andrew Sharp et al. Targeting the sympathetic nervous system with the selective imidazoline receptor agonist moxonidine for the management of hypertension: an international position statement. Abnormal brain-heart electrophysiology in mild and severe orthostatic hypotension. Mechanisms of thiazide-induced hypertension treatment: insights from gene expression and histological analysis in malignant stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Aortic reservoir-excess pressure parameters are associated with worse cognitive function in people with untreated stage II/III hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1