真正的全身 18F-FDG PET 检查结果在乳腺癌评估中的出现频率和临床意义。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.13797
Chris-Tin Cheng, Shane Lee, Kabir Ahmad, Dickson Ma
{"title":"真正的全身 18F-FDG PET 检查结果在乳腺癌评估中的出现频率和临床意义。","authors":"Chris-Tin Cheng, Shane Lee, Kabir Ahmad, Dickson Ma","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the assessment of breast cancer using 18-F FDG PET/CT, the incremental clinical benefit in performing a true whole-body PET/CT (with a field of view (FOV) from the vertex to the toes) over a limited whole-body PET/CT (with a FOV from the base of skull to the mid-thighs) is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and one studies of 120 patients who underwent staging or restaging true whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer were retrospectively identified. Any abnormal hypermetabolic or structural focus outside the limited FOV was recorded and characterised, and referenced with the patient's known disease status and any symptomatology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 (9.0%) studies had FDG avid and/or structural abnormalities detected outside the limited whole-body FOV which were identified as malignant. Seventeen out of 18 (94.4%) were skeletal and of these, 15/17 (88.2%) were located within the lower limbs. In three cases, there were de novo findings but identified in the presence of interval progression of other metastases within the limited whole-body FOV. None of these additional findings is known to have resulted in a change to staging or clinical management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the assessment of breast cancer, a true whole-body PET/CT can reveal metastases outside the limited whole-body FOV, but these are unlikely to be encountered in isolation and therefore may have little bearing on clinical stage or management. Ultimately, while the choice of FOV should still be based on the individual patient situation, routine utilisation of the true whole-body FOV in the asymptomatic patient may not be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and clinical implications of findings on true whole-body 18F-FDG PET in the assessment of breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Chris-Tin Cheng, Shane Lee, Kabir Ahmad, Dickson Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.13797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the assessment of breast cancer using 18-F FDG PET/CT, the incremental clinical benefit in performing a true whole-body PET/CT (with a field of view (FOV) from the vertex to the toes) over a limited whole-body PET/CT (with a FOV from the base of skull to the mid-thighs) is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred and one studies of 120 patients who underwent staging or restaging true whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer were retrospectively identified. Any abnormal hypermetabolic or structural focus outside the limited FOV was recorded and characterised, and referenced with the patient's known disease status and any symptomatology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 (9.0%) studies had FDG avid and/or structural abnormalities detected outside the limited whole-body FOV which were identified as malignant. Seventeen out of 18 (94.4%) were skeletal and of these, 15/17 (88.2%) were located within the lower limbs. In three cases, there were de novo findings but identified in the presence of interval progression of other metastases within the limited whole-body FOV. None of these additional findings is known to have resulted in a change to staging or clinical management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the assessment of breast cancer, a true whole-body PET/CT can reveal metastases outside the limited whole-body FOV, but these are unlikely to be encountered in isolation and therefore may have little bearing on clinical stage or management. Ultimately, while the choice of FOV should still be based on the individual patient situation, routine utilisation of the true whole-body FOV in the asymptomatic patient may not be necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13797\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在使用18-F FDG PET/CT评估乳腺癌时,进行真正的全身PET/CT(视场(FOV)从头顶到脚趾)与有限的全身PET/CT(视场从颅底到大腿中部)相比,其临床益处的增加尚不确定:方法:对 120 例乳腺癌分期或再分期真全身 18F-FDG PET/CT 患者的 211 项研究进行了回顾性鉴定。对有限FOV范围外的任何异常高代谢或结构病灶进行记录和定性,并参考患者已知的疾病状态和任何症状:共有18项(9.0%)研究在有限的全身FOV外检测到FDG显像和/或结构异常,并确定为恶性。18例中有17例(94.4%)为骨骼异常,其中15/17(88.2%)位于下肢。在三个病例中,有新的发现,但在有限的全身FOV范围内发现的其他转移灶存在间歇性进展。这些额外发现均未导致分期或临床管理的改变:结论:在评估乳腺癌时,真正的全身正电子发射计算机断层显像(PET/CT)可发现有限的全身FOV以外的转移灶,但这些转移灶不太可能单独出现,因此可能对临床分期或管理影响不大。最终,虽然 FOV 的选择仍应基于患者的个体情况,但无症状患者可能没有必要常规使用真正的全身 FOV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frequency and clinical implications of findings on true whole-body 18F-FDG PET in the assessment of breast cancer.

Introduction: In the assessment of breast cancer using 18-F FDG PET/CT, the incremental clinical benefit in performing a true whole-body PET/CT (with a field of view (FOV) from the vertex to the toes) over a limited whole-body PET/CT (with a FOV from the base of skull to the mid-thighs) is uncertain.

Methods: Two hundred and one studies of 120 patients who underwent staging or restaging true whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT for breast cancer were retrospectively identified. Any abnormal hypermetabolic or structural focus outside the limited FOV was recorded and characterised, and referenced with the patient's known disease status and any symptomatology.

Results: A total of 18 (9.0%) studies had FDG avid and/or structural abnormalities detected outside the limited whole-body FOV which were identified as malignant. Seventeen out of 18 (94.4%) were skeletal and of these, 15/17 (88.2%) were located within the lower limbs. In three cases, there were de novo findings but identified in the presence of interval progression of other metastases within the limited whole-body FOV. None of these additional findings is known to have resulted in a change to staging or clinical management.

Conclusion: In the assessment of breast cancer, a true whole-body PET/CT can reveal metastases outside the limited whole-body FOV, but these are unlikely to be encountered in isolation and therefore may have little bearing on clinical stage or management. Ultimately, while the choice of FOV should still be based on the individual patient situation, routine utilisation of the true whole-body FOV in the asymptomatic patient may not be necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Age Is Just a Number? A Retrospective Review of Cause of Death in Patients 85 Years and Over Receiving Lung Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy. Does Pelvic Congestion Cause Bladder Symptoms-Potential New Indication to Treat Pelvic Congestion. Is There Gender Disparity in RANZCR Radiation Oncology Grants and Prizes Success? Optimal Planning Target Volume Margins to Account for Intra-Fractional Prostate Motion Relative to Treatment Duration: A Study Using Real-Time Transperineal Ultrasound Guidance. The Prominent Subarachnoid Space in Children: How has a Normal Variant Become Medicolegally Life-Threatening Pathology?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1