对比耳蜗造口术和圆窗植入术对舌前失聪儿科患者的长期言语和阻抗效果。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Journal of Laryngology and Otology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1017/S0022215124001786
Nidhin Das K, Vidhu Sharma, Vishudh Mohan, Kapil Soni, Amit Goyal
{"title":"对比耳蜗造口术和圆窗植入术对舌前失聪儿科患者的长期言语和阻抗效果。","authors":"Nidhin Das K, Vidhu Sharma, Vishudh Mohan, Kapil Soni, Amit Goyal","doi":"10.1017/S0022215124001786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare long-term impedance and functional outcomes between the round window and cochleostomy approaches in cochlear implantation patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety prelingually deafened children who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation participated in this prospective observational study. Participants were divided into round window and cochleostomy groups. Impedance and speech perception were assessed at switch-on, and at 6, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Impedance was similar between groups except at switch-on, where the cochleostomy group had higher basal turn impedance (2.41 <i>vs</i> 1.32 kΩ). At 24 months, speech outcomes were as follows: word recognition in quiet (round window 96.2 per cent, cochleostomy 95.3 per cent), word recognition in noise (round window 88.8 per cent, cochleostomy 87.4 per cent), sentence recognition (round window 78.2 per cent, cochleostomy 77.3 per cent), and vowel recognition (round window 91.2 per cent, cochleostomy 90.1 per cent).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in impedance or speech outcomes were found between the round window and cochleostomy groups, except for higher basal-turn impedance at switch-on in the cochleostomy group, indicating more fibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of long-term speech and impedance outcome of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf paediatric patients between cochleostomy and round window insertion.\",\"authors\":\"Nidhin Das K, Vidhu Sharma, Vishudh Mohan, Kapil Soni, Amit Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0022215124001786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare long-term impedance and functional outcomes between the round window and cochleostomy approaches in cochlear implantation patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety prelingually deafened children who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation participated in this prospective observational study. Participants were divided into round window and cochleostomy groups. Impedance and speech perception were assessed at switch-on, and at 6, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Impedance was similar between groups except at switch-on, where the cochleostomy group had higher basal turn impedance (2.41 <i>vs</i> 1.32 kΩ). At 24 months, speech outcomes were as follows: word recognition in quiet (round window 96.2 per cent, cochleostomy 95.3 per cent), word recognition in noise (round window 88.8 per cent, cochleostomy 87.4 per cent), sentence recognition (round window 78.2 per cent, cochleostomy 77.3 per cent), and vowel recognition (round window 91.2 per cent, cochleostomy 90.1 per cent).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in impedance or speech outcomes were found between the round window and cochleostomy groups, except for higher basal-turn impedance at switch-on in the cochleostomy group, indicating more fibrosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laryngology and Otology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laryngology and Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215124001786\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215124001786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较圆形窗和耳蜗造口入路在人工耳蜗植入术中的长期阻抗和功能结果。方法:90名接受单侧人工耳蜗植入的语前耳聋儿童参加了这项前瞻性观察研究。参与者分为圆窗组和耳蜗造口组。在开机、6个月、12个月和24个月时评估阻抗和语音感知。结果:各组阻抗相似,但在打开时,耳蜗造瘘组有更高的基础匝阻抗(2.41 vs 1.32 kΩ)。在24个月时,语音结果如下:安静环境下的单词识别(圆形窗口96.2%,耳蜗造口术95.3%),噪音环境下的单词识别(圆形窗口88.8%,耳蜗造口术87.4%),句子识别(圆形窗口78.2%,耳蜗造口术77.3%),元音识别(圆形窗口91.2%,耳蜗造口术90.1%)。结论:圆窗组和耳蜗造口组在阻抗和语音结果上无显著差异,但耳蜗造口组在打开时基底转阻抗较高,表明纤维化较多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of long-term speech and impedance outcome of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf paediatric patients between cochleostomy and round window insertion.

Objectives: To compare long-term impedance and functional outcomes between the round window and cochleostomy approaches in cochlear implantation patients.

Methods: Ninety prelingually deafened children who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation participated in this prospective observational study. Participants were divided into round window and cochleostomy groups. Impedance and speech perception were assessed at switch-on, and at 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results: Impedance was similar between groups except at switch-on, where the cochleostomy group had higher basal turn impedance (2.41 vs 1.32 kΩ). At 24 months, speech outcomes were as follows: word recognition in quiet (round window 96.2 per cent, cochleostomy 95.3 per cent), word recognition in noise (round window 88.8 per cent, cochleostomy 87.4 per cent), sentence recognition (round window 78.2 per cent, cochleostomy 77.3 per cent), and vowel recognition (round window 91.2 per cent, cochleostomy 90.1 per cent).

Conclusion: No significant differences in impedance or speech outcomes were found between the round window and cochleostomy groups, except for higher basal-turn impedance at switch-on in the cochleostomy group, indicating more fibrosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laryngology and Otology
Journal of Laryngology and Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
593
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (JLO) is a leading, monthly journal containing original scientific articles and clinical records in otology, rhinology, laryngology and related specialties. Founded in 1887, JLO is absorbing reading for ENT specialists and trainees. The journal has an international outlook with contributions from around the world, relevant to all specialists in this area regardless of the country in which they practise. JLO contains main articles (original, review and historical), case reports and short reports as well as radiology, pathology or oncology in focus, a selection of abstracts, book reviews, letters to the editor, general notes and calendar, operative surgery techniques, and occasional supplements. It is fully illustrated and has become a definitive reference source in this fast-moving subject area. Published monthly an annual subscription is excellent value for money. Included in the subscription is access to the JLO interactive web site with searchable abstract database of the journal archive back to 1887.
期刊最新文献
Bioabsorbable steroid-eluting implants for mucosal graft fixation in Draf III frontal sinus surgery. Long Term Analysis of Vestibular Function in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct. Risk of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Hubble Bubble Smokers Presenting with Hoarseness. The Impact of Allergic Rhinitis on Functional, Aesthetic, and Scar Outcomes after Open Septorhinoplasty: A Prospective Controlled Study. A high-throughput tonsillectomy pathway using the BiZact™ device: a prospective service evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1