Nidhin Das K, Vidhu Sharma, Vishudh Mohan, Kapil Soni, Amit Goyal
{"title":"对比耳蜗造口术和圆窗植入术对舌前失聪儿科患者的长期言语和阻抗效果。","authors":"Nidhin Das K, Vidhu Sharma, Vishudh Mohan, Kapil Soni, Amit Goyal","doi":"10.1017/S0022215124001786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare long-term impedance and functional outcomes between the round window and cochleostomy approaches in cochlear implantation patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety prelingually deafened children who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation participated in this prospective observational study. Participants were divided into round window and cochleostomy groups. Impedance and speech perception were assessed at switch-on, and at 6, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Impedance was similar between groups except at switch-on, where the cochleostomy group had higher basal turn impedance (2.41 <i>vs</i> 1.32 kΩ). At 24 months, speech outcomes were as follows: word recognition in quiet (round window 96.2 per cent, cochleostomy 95.3 per cent), word recognition in noise (round window 88.8 per cent, cochleostomy 87.4 per cent), sentence recognition (round window 78.2 per cent, cochleostomy 77.3 per cent), and vowel recognition (round window 91.2 per cent, cochleostomy 90.1 per cent).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in impedance or speech outcomes were found between the round window and cochleostomy groups, except for higher basal-turn impedance at switch-on in the cochleostomy group, indicating more fibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16293,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of long-term speech and impedance outcome of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf paediatric patients between cochleostomy and round window insertion.\",\"authors\":\"Nidhin Das K, Vidhu Sharma, Vishudh Mohan, Kapil Soni, Amit Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0022215124001786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare long-term impedance and functional outcomes between the round window and cochleostomy approaches in cochlear implantation patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety prelingually deafened children who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation participated in this prospective observational study. Participants were divided into round window and cochleostomy groups. Impedance and speech perception were assessed at switch-on, and at 6, 12, and 24 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Impedance was similar between groups except at switch-on, where the cochleostomy group had higher basal turn impedance (2.41 <i>vs</i> 1.32 kΩ). At 24 months, speech outcomes were as follows: word recognition in quiet (round window 96.2 per cent, cochleostomy 95.3 per cent), word recognition in noise (round window 88.8 per cent, cochleostomy 87.4 per cent), sentence recognition (round window 78.2 per cent, cochleostomy 77.3 per cent), and vowel recognition (round window 91.2 per cent, cochleostomy 90.1 per cent).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in impedance or speech outcomes were found between the round window and cochleostomy groups, except for higher basal-turn impedance at switch-on in the cochleostomy group, indicating more fibrosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laryngology and Otology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laryngology and Otology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215124001786\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laryngology and Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215124001786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较圆形窗和耳蜗造口入路在人工耳蜗植入术中的长期阻抗和功能结果。方法:90名接受单侧人工耳蜗植入的语前耳聋儿童参加了这项前瞻性观察研究。参与者分为圆窗组和耳蜗造口组。在开机、6个月、12个月和24个月时评估阻抗和语音感知。结果:各组阻抗相似,但在打开时,耳蜗造瘘组有更高的基础匝阻抗(2.41 vs 1.32 kΩ)。在24个月时,语音结果如下:安静环境下的单词识别(圆形窗口96.2%,耳蜗造口术95.3%),噪音环境下的单词识别(圆形窗口88.8%,耳蜗造口术87.4%),句子识别(圆形窗口78.2%,耳蜗造口术77.3%),元音识别(圆形窗口91.2%,耳蜗造口术90.1%)。结论:圆窗组和耳蜗造口组在阻抗和语音结果上无显著差异,但耳蜗造口组在打开时基底转阻抗较高,表明纤维化较多。
Comparison of long-term speech and impedance outcome of cochlear implantation in prelingual deaf paediatric patients between cochleostomy and round window insertion.
Objectives: To compare long-term impedance and functional outcomes between the round window and cochleostomy approaches in cochlear implantation patients.
Methods: Ninety prelingually deafened children who underwent unilateral cochlear implantation participated in this prospective observational study. Participants were divided into round window and cochleostomy groups. Impedance and speech perception were assessed at switch-on, and at 6, 12, and 24 months.
Results: Impedance was similar between groups except at switch-on, where the cochleostomy group had higher basal turn impedance (2.41 vs 1.32 kΩ). At 24 months, speech outcomes were as follows: word recognition in quiet (round window 96.2 per cent, cochleostomy 95.3 per cent), word recognition in noise (round window 88.8 per cent, cochleostomy 87.4 per cent), sentence recognition (round window 78.2 per cent, cochleostomy 77.3 per cent), and vowel recognition (round window 91.2 per cent, cochleostomy 90.1 per cent).
Conclusion: No significant differences in impedance or speech outcomes were found between the round window and cochleostomy groups, except for higher basal-turn impedance at switch-on in the cochleostomy group, indicating more fibrosis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (JLO) is a leading, monthly journal containing original scientific articles and clinical records in otology, rhinology, laryngology and related specialties. Founded in 1887, JLO is absorbing reading for ENT specialists and trainees. The journal has an international outlook with contributions from around the world, relevant to all specialists in this area regardless of the country in which they practise. JLO contains main articles (original, review and historical), case reports and short reports as well as radiology, pathology or oncology in focus, a selection of abstracts, book reviews, letters to the editor, general notes and calendar, operative surgery techniques, and occasional supplements. It is fully illustrated and has become a definitive reference source in this fast-moving subject area. Published monthly an annual subscription is excellent value for money. Included in the subscription is access to the JLO interactive web site with searchable abstract database of the journal archive back to 1887.