居家安宁疗护中的共同用药计划,以解决用药方案的复杂性和家庭护理者的负担:简要报告。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0229
Jennifer Tjia, Margaret F Clayton, Geraldine Puerto, Vennesa Duodu, Francesca Troiani, Sruthi Tanikella, Susan DeSanto-Madeya
{"title":"居家安宁疗护中的共同用药计划,以解决用药方案的复杂性和家庭护理者的负担:简要报告。","authors":"Jennifer Tjia, Margaret F Clayton, Geraldine Puerto, Vennesa Duodu, Francesca Troiani, Sruthi Tanikella, Susan DeSanto-Madeya","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Medication management in home hospice is challenging for family caregivers (FCGs). We tested a patient-centered medication review and FCG support program delivered by hospice staff called \"Shared Medication PLanning In (SiMPLIfy) Home Hospice.\" <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A pilot cluster-randomized trial at two U.S. home hospice agencies measured the primary outcome of reduction in Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) (range 0 [no medications]-no upper limit) and secondary outcome of Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale (FCMAHS) (range 0 [no hassle-120 [greatest hassle]). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-two patient-FCG dyads enrolled. Mean baseline MRCI in the intervention group = 39 (95% CI: 30.9, 47.1) and control group = 25.5 (95% CI: 21.0-30.1). Half of intervention patients (3 of 6) had reduced MRCI compared with 26.7% (4 of 15) control patients (<i>p</i> = 0.07). MRCI was not significantly associated with caregiver burden. FCMAHS differed between spousal and nonspousal FCGs (<i>p</i> = 0.12). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> A clinician-FCG-patient communication program in home hospice is feasible and may reduce medication complexity. SiMPLIfy has the potential to reduce polypharmacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1653-1656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared Medication PLanning In Home Hospice to Address Medication Regimen Complexity and Family Caregiver Burden: A Brief Report.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Tjia, Margaret F Clayton, Geraldine Puerto, Vennesa Duodu, Francesca Troiani, Sruthi Tanikella, Susan DeSanto-Madeya\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> Medication management in home hospice is challenging for family caregivers (FCGs). We tested a patient-centered medication review and FCG support program delivered by hospice staff called \\\"Shared Medication PLanning In (SiMPLIfy) Home Hospice.\\\" <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A pilot cluster-randomized trial at two U.S. home hospice agencies measured the primary outcome of reduction in Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) (range 0 [no medications]-no upper limit) and secondary outcome of Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale (FCMAHS) (range 0 [no hassle-120 [greatest hassle]). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-two patient-FCG dyads enrolled. Mean baseline MRCI in the intervention group = 39 (95% CI: 30.9, 47.1) and control group = 25.5 (95% CI: 21.0-30.1). Half of intervention patients (3 of 6) had reduced MRCI compared with 26.7% (4 of 15) control patients (<i>p</i> = 0.07). MRCI was not significantly associated with caregiver burden. FCMAHS differed between spousal and nonspousal FCGs (<i>p</i> = 0.12). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> A clinician-FCG-patient communication program in home hospice is feasible and may reduce medication complexity. SiMPLIfy has the potential to reduce polypharmacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1653-1656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0229\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:居家安寧療護的藥物管理對於家庭照護者(FCGs)來說是一項挑戰。我们测试了一项由安宁疗护人员提供的以患者为中心的用药审查和家庭照护者支持计划,名为 "居家安宁疗护中的共同用药计划(SiMPLIfy)"。方法:在美国两家居家安宁疗护机构进行了分组随机试验,测量的主要结果是用药方案复杂性指数(MRCI)的降低(范围为0[无药物]-无上限),次要结果是家庭照护者用药管理麻烦量表(FCMAHS)的降低(范围为0[无麻烦-120[最麻烦])。结果:22对患者-FCG组合参加了研究。干预组平均基线 MRCI=39(95% CI:30.9,47.1),对照组平均基线 MRCI=25.5(95% CI:21.0-30.1)。半数干预组患者(6 例中的 3 例)的 MRCI 降低,而对照组患者的 MRCI 降低率为 26.7%(15 例中的 4 例)(P = 0.07)。MRCI 与照顾者的负担无明显关联。有配偶和无配偶的 FCG 之间的 FCMAHS 有差异(p = 0.12)。结论在居家临终关怀中实施临床医生-FCG-患者沟通计划是可行的,并可降低用药复杂性。SiMPLIfy有可能减少多重用药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shared Medication PLanning In Home Hospice to Address Medication Regimen Complexity and Family Caregiver Burden: A Brief Report.

Objective: Medication management in home hospice is challenging for family caregivers (FCGs). We tested a patient-centered medication review and FCG support program delivered by hospice staff called "Shared Medication PLanning In (SiMPLIfy) Home Hospice." Methods: A pilot cluster-randomized trial at two U.S. home hospice agencies measured the primary outcome of reduction in Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) (range 0 [no medications]-no upper limit) and secondary outcome of Family Caregiver Medication Administration Hassle Scale (FCMAHS) (range 0 [no hassle-120 [greatest hassle]). Results: Twenty-two patient-FCG dyads enrolled. Mean baseline MRCI in the intervention group = 39 (95% CI: 30.9, 47.1) and control group = 25.5 (95% CI: 21.0-30.1). Half of intervention patients (3 of 6) had reduced MRCI compared with 26.7% (4 of 15) control patients (p = 0.07). MRCI was not significantly associated with caregiver burden. FCMAHS differed between spousal and nonspousal FCGs (p = 0.12). Conclusion: A clinician-FCG-patient communication program in home hospice is feasible and may reduce medication complexity. SiMPLIfy has the potential to reduce polypharmacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes Toward Medical Assistance in Dying Among Swedish Palliative Care Professionals. Palliative Care and Intensivists' Different Perspectives on Specialist Palliative Care Engagement in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Care. Patterns of Specialty Palliative Consultation for Patients Admitted to Surgical Services. Letter to the Editor: "No-Shows" and Missed Opportunities: Reasons for Missed In-Person and Telehealth Appointments in an Ambulatory Palliative Care Program. What Matters to Older Native Hawaiians?: A Qualitative Study of Care Preferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1