基于肺野的严重程度评分(LFSS):识别 COVID-19 高危危重患者的可行工具。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Journal of thoracic disease Pub Date : 2024-09-30 Epub Date: 2024-09-06 DOI:10.21037/jtd-24-544
Xin'ang Jiang, Jun Hu, Qinling Jiang, Taohu Zhou, Fei Yao, Yi Sun, Qingyang Liu, Chao Zhou, Kang Shi, Xiaoqing Lin, Jie Li, Yueze Li, Qianxi Jin, Wenting Tu, Xiuxiu Zhou, Yun Wang, Xiaoyan Xin, Shiyuan Liu, Li Fan
{"title":"基于肺野的严重程度评分(LFSS):识别 COVID-19 高危危重患者的可行工具。","authors":"Xin'ang Jiang, Jun Hu, Qinling Jiang, Taohu Zhou, Fei Yao, Yi Sun, Qingyang Liu, Chao Zhou, Kang Shi, Xiaoqing Lin, Jie Li, Yueze Li, Qianxi Jin, Wenting Tu, Xiuxiu Zhou, Yun Wang, Xiaoyan Xin, Shiyuan Liu, Li Fan","doi":"10.21037/jtd-24-544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still poses a threat to people's physical and mental health. We proposed a new semi-quantitative visual classification method for COVID-19, and this study aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness and feasibility of lung field-based severity score (LFSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 794 COVID-19 patients from two hospitals in China between December 2022 and January 2023. Six lung fields on the axial computed tomography (CT) were defined. LFSS and eighteen clinical characteristics were evaluated. LFSS was based on summing up the parenchymal opacification involving each lung field, which was scored as 0 (0%), 1 (1-24%), 2 (25-49%), 3 (50-74%), or 4 (75-100%), respectively (range of LFSS from 0 to 24). Total pneumonia burden (TPB) was calculated using the U-net model. The correlation between LFSS and TPB was analyzed. After performing logistic regression analysis, an LFSS-based model, clinical-based model and combined model were developed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate and compare the performance of three models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LFSS, age, chronic liver disease, chronic kidney disease, white blood cell, neutrophils, lymphocytes and C-reactive protein differed significantly between the non-critical and critical group (all P<0.05). There was a strong positive correlation of LFSS and TPB (Pearson correlation coefficient =0.767, P<0.001). The area under curves of LFSS-based model, clinical-based model and combined model were 0.799 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.770-0.827], 0.758 (95% CI: 0.727-0.788), and 0.848 (95% CI: 0.821-0.872), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LFSS derived from chest CT may be a potential new tool to help identify COVID-19 patients at high risk of progressing to critical disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":17542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thoracic disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung field-based severity score (LFSS): a feasible tool to identify COVID-19 patients at high risk of progressing to critical disease.\",\"authors\":\"Xin'ang Jiang, Jun Hu, Qinling Jiang, Taohu Zhou, Fei Yao, Yi Sun, Qingyang Liu, Chao Zhou, Kang Shi, Xiaoqing Lin, Jie Li, Yueze Li, Qianxi Jin, Wenting Tu, Xiuxiu Zhou, Yun Wang, Xiaoyan Xin, Shiyuan Liu, Li Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jtd-24-544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still poses a threat to people's physical and mental health. We proposed a new semi-quantitative visual classification method for COVID-19, and this study aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness and feasibility of lung field-based severity score (LFSS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 794 COVID-19 patients from two hospitals in China between December 2022 and January 2023. Six lung fields on the axial computed tomography (CT) were defined. LFSS and eighteen clinical characteristics were evaluated. LFSS was based on summing up the parenchymal opacification involving each lung field, which was scored as 0 (0%), 1 (1-24%), 2 (25-49%), 3 (50-74%), or 4 (75-100%), respectively (range of LFSS from 0 to 24). Total pneumonia burden (TPB) was calculated using the U-net model. The correlation between LFSS and TPB was analyzed. After performing logistic regression analysis, an LFSS-based model, clinical-based model and combined model were developed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate and compare the performance of three models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LFSS, age, chronic liver disease, chronic kidney disease, white blood cell, neutrophils, lymphocytes and C-reactive protein differed significantly between the non-critical and critical group (all P<0.05). There was a strong positive correlation of LFSS and TPB (Pearson correlation coefficient =0.767, P<0.001). The area under curves of LFSS-based model, clinical-based model and combined model were 0.799 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.770-0.827], 0.758 (95% CI: 0.727-0.788), and 0.848 (95% CI: 0.821-0.872), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LFSS derived from chest CT may be a potential new tool to help identify COVID-19 patients at high risk of progressing to critical disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494559/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of thoracic disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-544\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thoracic disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-24-544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)仍对人们的身心健康构成威胁。我们针对 COVID-19 提出了一种新的半定量视觉分类方法,本研究旨在评估基于肺野的严重程度评分(LFSS)的临床实用性和可行性:本回顾性研究纳入了2022年12月至2023年1月期间中国两家医院的794例COVID-19患者。定义了轴向计算机断层扫描(CT)上的六个肺野。评估了 LFSS 和 18 个临床特征。LFSS 是基于涉及每个肺野的实质不透明的总和,分别记为 0(0%)、1(1-24%)、2(25-49%)、3(50-74%)或 4(75-100%)(LFSS 范围从 0 到 24)。肺炎总负担(TPB)采用 U 网模型计算。分析了 LFSS 与 TPB 之间的相关性。在进行逻辑回归分析后,建立了基于 LFSS 的模型、基于临床的模型和综合模型。结果:LFSS、年龄、慢性肝病、慢性肾病、白细胞、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞和 C 反应蛋白在非危重组和危重组之间存在显著差异(均为 PC 结论:胸部 CT 导出的 LFSS 可能是一种潜在的新工具,有助于识别 COVID-19 患者发展为危重症的高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lung field-based severity score (LFSS): a feasible tool to identify COVID-19 patients at high risk of progressing to critical disease.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still poses a threat to people's physical and mental health. We proposed a new semi-quantitative visual classification method for COVID-19, and this study aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness and feasibility of lung field-based severity score (LFSS).

Methods: This retrospective study included 794 COVID-19 patients from two hospitals in China between December 2022 and January 2023. Six lung fields on the axial computed tomography (CT) were defined. LFSS and eighteen clinical characteristics were evaluated. LFSS was based on summing up the parenchymal opacification involving each lung field, which was scored as 0 (0%), 1 (1-24%), 2 (25-49%), 3 (50-74%), or 4 (75-100%), respectively (range of LFSS from 0 to 24). Total pneumonia burden (TPB) was calculated using the U-net model. The correlation between LFSS and TPB was analyzed. After performing logistic regression analysis, an LFSS-based model, clinical-based model and combined model were developed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate and compare the performance of three models.

Results: LFSS, age, chronic liver disease, chronic kidney disease, white blood cell, neutrophils, lymphocytes and C-reactive protein differed significantly between the non-critical and critical group (all P<0.05). There was a strong positive correlation of LFSS and TPB (Pearson correlation coefficient =0.767, P<0.001). The area under curves of LFSS-based model, clinical-based model and combined model were 0.799 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.770-0.827], 0.758 (95% CI: 0.727-0.788), and 0.848 (95% CI: 0.821-0.872), respectively.

Conclusions: The LFSS derived from chest CT may be a potential new tool to help identify COVID-19 patients at high risk of progressing to critical disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thoracic disease
Journal of thoracic disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
254
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic Disease (JTD, J Thorac Dis, pISSN: 2072-1439; eISSN: 2077-6624) was founded in Dec 2009, and indexed in PubMed in Dec 2011 and Science Citation Index SCI in Feb 2013. It is published quarterly (Dec 2009- Dec 2011), bimonthly (Jan 2012 - Dec 2013), monthly (Jan. 2014-) and openly distributed worldwide. JTD received its impact factor of 2.365 for the year 2016. JTD publishes manuscripts that describe new findings and provide current, practical information on the diagnosis and treatment of conditions related to thoracic disease. All the submission and reviewing are conducted electronically so that rapid review is assured.
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric and knowledge map analysis of one lung ventilation. Bronchial asthma with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared with low FEV1. Characteristics and outcomes of salvage surgery after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for initially unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. Characteristics of the top 100 cited original studies on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a bibliometric analysis. Chordoma combined with Trousseau syndrome: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1