三级医疗中心的急性胆囊炎治疗:我们是否遵循了现行指南?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03510-w
Andrea Spota, Amir Hassanpour, Eran Shlomovitz, David Gomez, Eisar Al-Sukhni
{"title":"三级医疗中心的急性胆囊炎治疗:我们是否遵循了现行指南?","authors":"Andrea Spota, Amir Hassanpour, Eran Shlomovitz, David Gomez, Eisar Al-Sukhni","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03510-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>After the Tokyo 2018 guidelines (TG2018) were published, evidence from the 2018 CHOCOLATE RCT supported early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC), even in high-risk patients. This study aims to investigate AC management at our tertiary care center in the years following these publications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients admitted from 2018 to 2023. AC severity was graded using TG2018 definitions. Comorbidities were summarized using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and frailty using the 5-item modified Frailty Index (5mFI). Compliance with TG2018 recommendations for management strategy was investigated. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery versus non-operative management (NOM). Subset analysis based on patients' age, frailty, and comorbidities was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 642 AC patients, 57% underwent cholecystectomy and 43% NOM (22% percutaneous cholecystostomy, 21% antibiotics only). NOM patients had greater length of stay (LOS), complications, deaths, readmissions, and discharge to nursing/rehab versus surgery patients. In 70% of patients managed non-operatively, TG2018 were not followed. Patients managed non-operatively despite TG2018 were more likely to undergo delayed cholecystectomy compared to those in whom guidelines were followed (17% vs. 4%). In subset analysis, healthy octogenarians were significantly less likely to be managed according to TG2018 (9.4%); patients undergoing surgery had a trend towards shorter LOS (3.1 vs. 4.8 days) than those managed non-operatively but no difference in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients undergoing NOM could potentially undergo cholecystectomy if guidelines are considered. A more objective approach to risk assessment may optimize patient selection and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute cholecystitis management at a tertiary care center: are we following current guidelines?\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Spota, Amir Hassanpour, Eran Shlomovitz, David Gomez, Eisar Al-Sukhni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-024-03510-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>After the Tokyo 2018 guidelines (TG2018) were published, evidence from the 2018 CHOCOLATE RCT supported early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC), even in high-risk patients. This study aims to investigate AC management at our tertiary care center in the years following these publications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients admitted from 2018 to 2023. AC severity was graded using TG2018 definitions. Comorbidities were summarized using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and frailty using the 5-item modified Frailty Index (5mFI). Compliance with TG2018 recommendations for management strategy was investigated. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery versus non-operative management (NOM). Subset analysis based on patients' age, frailty, and comorbidities was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 642 AC patients, 57% underwent cholecystectomy and 43% NOM (22% percutaneous cholecystostomy, 21% antibiotics only). NOM patients had greater length of stay (LOS), complications, deaths, readmissions, and discharge to nursing/rehab versus surgery patients. In 70% of patients managed non-operatively, TG2018 were not followed. Patients managed non-operatively despite TG2018 were more likely to undergo delayed cholecystectomy compared to those in whom guidelines were followed (17% vs. 4%). In subset analysis, healthy octogenarians were significantly less likely to be managed according to TG2018 (9.4%); patients undergoing surgery had a trend towards shorter LOS (3.1 vs. 4.8 days) than those managed non-operatively but no difference in other outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients undergoing NOM could potentially undergo cholecystectomy if guidelines are considered. A more objective approach to risk assessment may optimize patient selection and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03510-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03510-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:东京 2018 年指南(TG2018)发布后,2018 年 CHOCOLATE RCT 的证据支持对急性胆囊炎(AC)进行早期胆囊切除术,即使是高风险患者。本研究旨在调查我们三级医疗中心在上述文件发布后的几年内对急性胆囊炎的处理情况:对 2018 年至 2023 年期间收治的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。采用 TG2018 定义对 AC 严重程度进行分级。合并症采用夏尔森合并症指数(CCI)进行总结,虚弱程度采用 5 项改良虚弱指数(5mFI)进行总结。调查了患者对 TG2018 建议管理策略的遵从情况。对接受手术和非手术治疗(NOM)的患者的治疗效果进行了比较。根据患者的年龄、虚弱程度和合并症进行了子集分析:在642名急性胆囊炎患者中,57%接受了胆囊切除术,43%接受了非手术治疗(22%接受经皮胆囊造口术,21%仅使用抗生素)。与手术患者相比,非手术患者的住院时间(LOS)、并发症、死亡、再入院和出院护理/康复时间更长。70%的非手术治疗患者未接受TG2018。与遵循指南的患者相比(17% 对 4%),遵循 TG2018 的非手术治疗患者更有可能接受延迟胆囊切除术。在子集分析中,健康的八旬老人按照TG2018进行管理的可能性明显较低(9.4%);接受手术治疗的患者的LOS(3.1天 vs. 4.8天)有缩短的趋势,而非手术治疗的患者的LOS(3.1天 vs. 4.8天)有缩短的趋势,但其他结果没有差异:结论:如果考虑到相关指南,大多数接受NOM治疗的患者都有可能接受胆囊切除术。结论:如果考虑到相关指南,大多数接受 NOM 手术的患者都有可能接受胆囊切除术。更客观的风险评估方法可优化患者选择和治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute cholecystitis management at a tertiary care center: are we following current guidelines?

Purpose: After the Tokyo 2018 guidelines (TG2018) were published, evidence from the 2018 CHOCOLATE RCT supported early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC), even in high-risk patients. This study aims to investigate AC management at our tertiary care center in the years following these publications.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients admitted from 2018 to 2023. AC severity was graded using TG2018 definitions. Comorbidities were summarized using Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and frailty using the 5-item modified Frailty Index (5mFI). Compliance with TG2018 recommendations for management strategy was investigated. Outcomes were compared between patients who underwent surgery versus non-operative management (NOM). Subset analysis based on patients' age, frailty, and comorbidities was performed.

Results: Among 642 AC patients, 57% underwent cholecystectomy and 43% NOM (22% percutaneous cholecystostomy, 21% antibiotics only). NOM patients had greater length of stay (LOS), complications, deaths, readmissions, and discharge to nursing/rehab versus surgery patients. In 70% of patients managed non-operatively, TG2018 were not followed. Patients managed non-operatively despite TG2018 were more likely to undergo delayed cholecystectomy compared to those in whom guidelines were followed (17% vs. 4%). In subset analysis, healthy octogenarians were significantly less likely to be managed according to TG2018 (9.4%); patients undergoing surgery had a trend towards shorter LOS (3.1 vs. 4.8 days) than those managed non-operatively but no difference in other outcomes.

Conclusion: Most patients undergoing NOM could potentially undergo cholecystectomy if guidelines are considered. A more objective approach to risk assessment may optimize patient selection and outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
期刊最新文献
Intensified outpatient nutrition management improves body weight and skeletal muscle loss after esophageal cancer surgery: a single-center, retrospective, single-arm clinical study. Assessment of first-touch skills in robotic surgical training using hi-Sim and the hinotori surgical robot system among surgeons and novices. Comparing surgical outcomes of powered versus manual surgical staplers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 3D vs. 2D-4 K: Performance and self-perception of laparoscopic novices in a randomized prospective teaching intervention using standard tasks and box trainers. Research methodologies for eliciting patients' preferences in invasive procedures: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1