七个中低收入国家婴儿产后 6 周内的抗生素使用情况:A-PLUS 试验结果。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1080/20469047.2024.2414472
Haleema Yasmin, Saba Tanveer, Shiyam Sunder Tikmani, Janet L Moore, Iram Shakeel, Anum Rahim, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Melissa Bauserman, Musaku Mwenechanya, Elwyn Chomba, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Avinash Kavi, Richard J Derman, Nancy F Krebs, Lester Figueroa, Manolo Mazariegos, Paul Nyongesa, Sherri Bucher, Fabian Esamai, Archana Patel, Manjushree Waikar, Poonam Shivkumar, Patricia L Hibberd, William A Petri, Sk Masum Billah, Rashidul Haque, Waldemar A Carlo, Alan Tita, Marion Koso-Thomas, Jennifer Hemingway-Foday, Sarah Saleem, Elizabeth M McClure, Robert L Goldenberg
{"title":"七个中低收入国家婴儿产后 6 周内的抗生素使用情况:A-PLUS 试验结果。","authors":"Haleema Yasmin, Saba Tanveer, Shiyam Sunder Tikmani, Janet L Moore, Iram Shakeel, Anum Rahim, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Melissa Bauserman, Musaku Mwenechanya, Elwyn Chomba, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Avinash Kavi, Richard J Derman, Nancy F Krebs, Lester Figueroa, Manolo Mazariegos, Paul Nyongesa, Sherri Bucher, Fabian Esamai, Archana Patel, Manjushree Waikar, Poonam Shivkumar, Patricia L Hibberd, William A Petri, Sk Masum Billah, Rashidul Haque, Waldemar A Carlo, Alan Tita, Marion Koso-Thomas, Jennifer Hemingway-Foday, Sarah Saleem, Elizabeth M McClure, Robert L Goldenberg","doi":"10.1080/20469047.2024.2414472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antibiotic use is increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); however, few studies have examined the rates of use in a population. The use of antibiotics for liveborn infants in LMIC was examined.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study, a planned prospective, observational secondary analysis of the A-PLUS randomised controlled trial of azithromycin, was conducted in Global Network sites in seven countries: Bangladesh, Pakistan, India (two sites), Kenya, Zambia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Guatemala. The analyses included liveborn infants of women planning a vaginal delivery who were enrolled in the A-PLUS trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected on liveborn infants related to non-study antibiotic use in two time-periods: (i) after delivery while in the facility, and (ii) after discharge until 42 days post-partum. Antibiotic use was also examined in preterm and term infants. The most commonly used antibiotics were classified into three groups: penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. Antibiotics used in <1% of infants are not presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29,354 eligible infants in the study, 2224 (7.6%, 95% CI 7.3-7.9) received non-study antibiotics in the facility after delivery, and 3847 (13.1%, 95% CI 12.7-13.5) received non-study antibiotics after facility discharge until Day 42. In the facility, antibiotics were given to newborns more frequently in sites in Asia and less frequently in sites in Africa and Guatemala. Similarly, after facility discharge, infants were more likely to receive antibiotics in the Asian sites and less so in the African sites and Guatemala. In the facilities, antibiotics were used predominately for prophylaxis (70.7%) but after facility discharge antibiotics were given more often for treatment (56.8%). Preterm infants received more non-study antibiotics than term infants. The antibiotics used varied substantially by time-period and site but, in general, penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides were the antibiotic categories used more frequently.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across the Global Network sites, which represent a range of LMIC, nearly 8% of infants received non-study antibiotics more often for prophylaxis, with 13% of infants receiving non-study antibiotics following hospital discharge. With concerns about increasing antimicrobial resistance worldwide, further attention should be given to appropriate antibiotic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic use in infants in the 6 weeks after delivery in seven low- and middle-income countries: findings from the A-PLUS trial.\",\"authors\":\"Haleema Yasmin, Saba Tanveer, Shiyam Sunder Tikmani, Janet L Moore, Iram Shakeel, Anum Rahim, Adrien Lokangaka, Antoinette Tshefu, Melissa Bauserman, Musaku Mwenechanya, Elwyn Chomba, Shivaprasad S Goudar, Avinash Kavi, Richard J Derman, Nancy F Krebs, Lester Figueroa, Manolo Mazariegos, Paul Nyongesa, Sherri Bucher, Fabian Esamai, Archana Patel, Manjushree Waikar, Poonam Shivkumar, Patricia L Hibberd, William A Petri, Sk Masum Billah, Rashidul Haque, Waldemar A Carlo, Alan Tita, Marion Koso-Thomas, Jennifer Hemingway-Foday, Sarah Saleem, Elizabeth M McClure, Robert L Goldenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20469047.2024.2414472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antibiotic use is increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); however, few studies have examined the rates of use in a population. The use of antibiotics for liveborn infants in LMIC was examined.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study, a planned prospective, observational secondary analysis of the A-PLUS randomised controlled trial of azithromycin, was conducted in Global Network sites in seven countries: Bangladesh, Pakistan, India (two sites), Kenya, Zambia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Guatemala. The analyses included liveborn infants of women planning a vaginal delivery who were enrolled in the A-PLUS trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected on liveborn infants related to non-study antibiotic use in two time-periods: (i) after delivery while in the facility, and (ii) after discharge until 42 days post-partum. Antibiotic use was also examined in preterm and term infants. The most commonly used antibiotics were classified into three groups: penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. Antibiotics used in <1% of infants are not presented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 29,354 eligible infants in the study, 2224 (7.6%, 95% CI 7.3-7.9) received non-study antibiotics in the facility after delivery, and 3847 (13.1%, 95% CI 12.7-13.5) received non-study antibiotics after facility discharge until Day 42. In the facility, antibiotics were given to newborns more frequently in sites in Asia and less frequently in sites in Africa and Guatemala. Similarly, after facility discharge, infants were more likely to receive antibiotics in the Asian sites and less so in the African sites and Guatemala. In the facilities, antibiotics were used predominately for prophylaxis (70.7%) but after facility discharge antibiotics were given more often for treatment (56.8%). Preterm infants received more non-study antibiotics than term infants. The antibiotics used varied substantially by time-period and site but, in general, penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides were the antibiotic categories used more frequently.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across the Global Network sites, which represent a range of LMIC, nearly 8% of infants received non-study antibiotics more often for prophylaxis, with 13% of infants receiving non-study antibiotics following hospital discharge. With concerns about increasing antimicrobial resistance worldwide, further attention should be given to appropriate antibiotic use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2024.2414472\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2024.2414472","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:抗生素的使用在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)日益增多;然而,很少有研究对人群的抗生素使用率进行调查。本研究对中低收入国家活产婴儿的抗生素使用情况进行了调查:该研究是对阿奇霉素随机对照试验 A-PLUS 的一项有计划的前瞻性观察性二次分析,在七个国家的全球网络站点进行:孟加拉国、巴基斯坦、印度(两处)、肯尼亚、赞比亚、刚果民主共和国和危地马拉。分析对象包括参加 A-PLUS 试验的计划经阴道分娩的妇女所生的活产婴儿:收集了两个时间段内与非研究抗生素使用相关的活产婴儿数据:(i) 分娩后在医疗机构内的时间段,以及 (ii) 出院后至产后 42 天的时间段。此外,还对早产儿和足月儿的抗生素使用情况进行了调查。最常用的抗生素分为三类:青霉素类、头孢菌素类和氨基糖苷类。结果在符合研究条件的 29354 名婴儿中,2224 名(7.6%,95% CI 7.3-7.9)婴儿在分娩后在医疗机构接受了非研究抗生素治疗,3847 名(13.1%,95% CI 12.7-13.5)婴儿在出院后至第 42 天接受了非研究抗生素治疗。在亚洲的医疗机构中,新生儿接受抗生素治疗的频率较高,而在非洲和危地马拉的医疗机构中,新生儿接受抗生素治疗的频率较低。同样,出院后,亚洲医疗点的新生儿更有可能使用抗生素,而非洲和危地马拉医疗点的新生儿则较少使用抗生素。在医疗机构中,抗生素主要用于预防(70.7%),但出院后抗生素更多用于治疗(56.8%)。早产儿比足月儿使用更多的非研究抗生素。抗生素的使用因时间段和地点的不同而有很大差异,但总的来说,青霉素类、头孢菌素类和氨基糖苷类是使用频率较高的抗生素类别:结论:在全球网络的各个医疗点(代表了一系列低收入、中等收入国家)中,近 8% 的婴儿更频繁地使用非研究抗生素进行预防,13% 的婴儿在出院后使用非研究抗生素。鉴于全球范围内抗菌药耐药性不断增加的问题,应进一步关注抗生素的合理使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic use in infants in the 6 weeks after delivery in seven low- and middle-income countries: findings from the A-PLUS trial.

Objectives: Antibiotic use is increasing in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); however, few studies have examined the rates of use in a population. The use of antibiotics for liveborn infants in LMIC was examined.

Design: The study, a planned prospective, observational secondary analysis of the A-PLUS randomised controlled trial of azithromycin, was conducted in Global Network sites in seven countries: Bangladesh, Pakistan, India (two sites), Kenya, Zambia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Guatemala. The analyses included liveborn infants of women planning a vaginal delivery who were enrolled in the A-PLUS trial.

Methods: Data were collected on liveborn infants related to non-study antibiotic use in two time-periods: (i) after delivery while in the facility, and (ii) after discharge until 42 days post-partum. Antibiotic use was also examined in preterm and term infants. The most commonly used antibiotics were classified into three groups: penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. Antibiotics used in <1% of infants are not presented.

Results: Of the 29,354 eligible infants in the study, 2224 (7.6%, 95% CI 7.3-7.9) received non-study antibiotics in the facility after delivery, and 3847 (13.1%, 95% CI 12.7-13.5) received non-study antibiotics after facility discharge until Day 42. In the facility, antibiotics were given to newborns more frequently in sites in Asia and less frequently in sites in Africa and Guatemala. Similarly, after facility discharge, infants were more likely to receive antibiotics in the Asian sites and less so in the African sites and Guatemala. In the facilities, antibiotics were used predominately for prophylaxis (70.7%) but after facility discharge antibiotics were given more often for treatment (56.8%). Preterm infants received more non-study antibiotics than term infants. The antibiotics used varied substantially by time-period and site but, in general, penicillins, cephalosporins and aminoglycosides were the antibiotic categories used more frequently.

Conclusions: Across the Global Network sites, which represent a range of LMIC, nearly 8% of infants received non-study antibiotics more often for prophylaxis, with 13% of infants receiving non-study antibiotics following hospital discharge. With concerns about increasing antimicrobial resistance worldwide, further attention should be given to appropriate antibiotic use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Intentions to move abroad among medical students: a cross-sectional study to investigate determinants and opinions. Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. The change process questionnaire (CPQ): A psychometric validation. Psychosexual dysfunction in male patients with cannabis dependence and synthetic cannabinoid dependence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1