设计鼻衬-框架复合体,用于重建全鼻缺损。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1002/ohn.1006
Bao-Fu Yu, Shu-Yi Wei, Xiao-Xue Chen, Zi Wang, Hai-Jun Zhu, You-Lai Zhang, Jia Liu, Jin-Guang He, Chuang-Chang Dai, Jiao Wei
{"title":"设计鼻衬-框架复合体,用于重建全鼻缺损。","authors":"Bao-Fu Yu, Shu-Yi Wei, Xiao-Xue Chen, Zi Wang, Hai-Jun Zhu, You-Lai Zhang, Jia Liu, Jin-Guang He, Chuang-Chang Dai, Jiao Wei","doi":"10.1002/ohn.1006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the feasibility of an innovative nasal lining-framework complex (NLFC) for reconstructing total nasal defects.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This NLFC is composed of forearm flap and support framework. Twenty-four patients were followed up for a minimum of 17 months in 5 centers. Patients' medical history data were retrospectively analyzed. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of surgeons and patients was used to evaluate the aesthetic effects and self-satisfaction. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire were used for functional assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reconstruction surgeries were all successfully completed. The flaps healed well in all patients, and there were no signs of ischemic necrosis. The healing time of the wound was 10 to 14 days, except for 1 case with infection. The nasal lining was reconstructed and no significant contracture was observed. The average VAS of surgeons was 4.29 ± 0.69 (range 3-5). The mean VAS score of patients was 3.75 ± 0.79 (range 2-5). There was a significant positive correlation between patients' and surgeons' VAS scores (P = .007, r = .5355). The results of the NOSE questionnaire showed that all patients had no obvious ventilation restriction, and only 3 patients mildly felt that the nasal inspirations were slightly insufficient during exercise or exertion. The mean ROE of the patients was 21 ± 1.96 (range 18-25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This NLFC is suitable for total nasal reconstruction, which can provide effective support to prevent flap collapse and retraction and ensure good nasal ventilation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":19707,"journal":{"name":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"457-465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a Nasal Lining-Framework Complex for Reconstructing Total Nasal Defects.\",\"authors\":\"Bao-Fu Yu, Shu-Yi Wei, Xiao-Xue Chen, Zi Wang, Hai-Jun Zhu, You-Lai Zhang, Jia Liu, Jin-Guang He, Chuang-Chang Dai, Jiao Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ohn.1006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To validate the feasibility of an innovative nasal lining-framework complex (NLFC) for reconstructing total nasal defects.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This NLFC is composed of forearm flap and support framework. Twenty-four patients were followed up for a minimum of 17 months in 5 centers. Patients' medical history data were retrospectively analyzed. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of surgeons and patients was used to evaluate the aesthetic effects and self-satisfaction. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire were used for functional assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reconstruction surgeries were all successfully completed. The flaps healed well in all patients, and there were no signs of ischemic necrosis. The healing time of the wound was 10 to 14 days, except for 1 case with infection. The nasal lining was reconstructed and no significant contracture was observed. The average VAS of surgeons was 4.29 ± 0.69 (range 3-5). The mean VAS score of patients was 3.75 ± 0.79 (range 2-5). There was a significant positive correlation between patients' and surgeons' VAS scores (P = .007, r = .5355). The results of the NOSE questionnaire showed that all patients had no obvious ventilation restriction, and only 3 patients mildly felt that the nasal inspirations were slightly insufficient during exercise or exertion. The mean ROE of the patients was 21 ± 1.96 (range 18-25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This NLFC is suitable for total nasal reconstruction, which can provide effective support to prevent flap collapse and retraction and ensure good nasal ventilation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, therapeutic study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"457-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证创新性鼻内衬-框架复合体(NLFC)重建全鼻缺损的可行性:验证创新性鼻内衬-框架复合体(NLFC)重建全鼻缺损的可行性:研究设计:回顾性队列研究:该 NLFC 由前臂皮瓣和支撑框架组成。在 5 个中心对 24 名患者进行了至少 17 个月的随访。对患者的病史资料进行了回顾性分析。外科医生和患者的视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于评估美学效果和自我满意度。鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)问卷和鼻整形术效果评估(ROE)问卷用于功能评估:重建手术全部顺利完成。所有患者的皮瓣愈合良好,没有缺血坏死的迹象。伤口愈合时间为 10 至 14 天,只有 1 例患者出现感染。鼻腔内膜已重建,未观察到明显的挛缩。外科医生的平均 VAS 为 4.29 ± 0.69(范围为 3-5)。患者的平均 VAS 评分为 3.75 ± 0.79(范围 2-5)。患者和外科医生的 VAS 评分之间存在明显的正相关性(P = .007,r = .5355)。NOSE 问卷调查结果显示,所有患者均无明显的通气受限,仅有 3 名患者在运动或用力时轻度感到鼻腔吸气稍有不足。患者的平均 ROE 为 21 ± 1.96(18-25):结论:这种 NLFC 适用于全鼻重建,可提供有效支撑,防止皮瓣塌陷和回缩,确保良好的鼻腔通气:证据等级:IV 级,治疗性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing a Nasal Lining-Framework Complex for Reconstructing Total Nasal Defects.

Objective: To validate the feasibility of an innovative nasal lining-framework complex (NLFC) for reconstructing total nasal defects.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Methods: This NLFC is composed of forearm flap and support framework. Twenty-four patients were followed up for a minimum of 17 months in 5 centers. Patients' medical history data were retrospectively analyzed. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of surgeons and patients was used to evaluate the aesthetic effects and self-satisfaction. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire and Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) questionnaire were used for functional assessment.

Results: Reconstruction surgeries were all successfully completed. The flaps healed well in all patients, and there were no signs of ischemic necrosis. The healing time of the wound was 10 to 14 days, except for 1 case with infection. The nasal lining was reconstructed and no significant contracture was observed. The average VAS of surgeons was 4.29 ± 0.69 (range 3-5). The mean VAS score of patients was 3.75 ± 0.79 (range 2-5). There was a significant positive correlation between patients' and surgeons' VAS scores (P = .007, r = .5355). The results of the NOSE questionnaire showed that all patients had no obvious ventilation restriction, and only 3 patients mildly felt that the nasal inspirations were slightly insufficient during exercise or exertion. The mean ROE of the patients was 21 ± 1.96 (range 18-25).

Conclusion: This NLFC is suitable for total nasal reconstruction, which can provide effective support to prevent flap collapse and retraction and ensure good nasal ventilation.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery
Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
250
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (OTO-HNS) is the official peer-reviewed publication of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. The mission of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant information in otolaryngology, head and neck surgery (ear, nose, throat, head, and neck disorders) that can be used by otolaryngologists, clinicians, scientists, and specialists to improve patient care and public health.
期刊最新文献
Nasal Corticosteroid Delivery Methods in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: A Systematic Review. Congenital Pyriform Aperture Stenosis: Not All Patients Require Open Repair. Time-Driven Activity Based Costing of an Annual Canadian Cochlear Implant Program. Are Otolaryngologists Seeing More Cough? Longitudinal Trends and Patterns. Effectiveness of Changing Drug Classes in Patients With Refractory Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1