便携式光学相干断层扫描在糖尿病黄斑水肿中的可重复性研究。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.3390/ph17101357
Yoshiaki Chiku, Takao Hirano, Marie Nakamura, Yoshiaki Takahashi, Hideki Miyasaka, Ken Hoshiyama, Toshinori Murata
{"title":"便携式光学相干断层扫描在糖尿病黄斑水肿中的可重复性研究。","authors":"Yoshiaki Chiku, Takao Hirano, Marie Nakamura, Yoshiaki Takahashi, Hideki Miyasaka, Ken Hoshiyama, Toshinori Murata","doi":"10.3390/ph17101357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diabetic macular edema (DME) causes vision impairment and significant vision loss. Portable optical coherence tomography (OCT) has the potential to enhance the accessibility and frequency of DME screening, facilitating early diagnosis and continuous monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a portable OCT device (ACT100) in assessing DME compared with a traditional stationary OCT device (Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT plus). <b>Methods:</b> This prospective clinical investigation included 40 eyes of 33 patients with DME. Participants with significant refractive errors (myopia > -6.0 diopters or hyperopia > +3.0 diopters), vitreous hemorrhage, tractional retinal detachment, or other ocular diseases affecting imaging were excluded. Spectral-domain OCT was performed by a single examiner using both devices to capture macular volume scans under mydriasis. Central macular thickness (CMT) was evaluated using the analysis software for each device: Cirrus used version 6.0.4, and ACT100 used version V20. We analyzed inter-evaluator and inter-instrument agreements for qualitative assessments of the intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and epiretinal membrane (ERM) using Cohen's kappa coefficient, whereas quantitative CMT assessments were correlated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. <b>Results:</b> Substantial inter-evaluator agreement for IRF/SRF (κ = 0.801) and ERM (κ = 0.688) with ACT100 and inter-instrument agreement (κ = 0.756 for IRF/SRF, κ = 0.684 for ERM) were observed. CMT values measured using ACT100 were on average 29.6 μm lower than that of Cirrus (285.8 ± 56.6 vs. 315.4 ± 84.7 μm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) but showed a strong correlation (R = 0.76, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions:</b> ACT100 portable OCT demonstrated high reliability for DME evaluations, comparable to that of stationary systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":20198,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":"17 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the Reproducibility of Portable Optical Coherence Tomography in Diabetic Macular Edema.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiaki Chiku, Takao Hirano, Marie Nakamura, Yoshiaki Takahashi, Hideki Miyasaka, Ken Hoshiyama, Toshinori Murata\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ph17101357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diabetic macular edema (DME) causes vision impairment and significant vision loss. Portable optical coherence tomography (OCT) has the potential to enhance the accessibility and frequency of DME screening, facilitating early diagnosis and continuous monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a portable OCT device (ACT100) in assessing DME compared with a traditional stationary OCT device (Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT plus). <b>Methods:</b> This prospective clinical investigation included 40 eyes of 33 patients with DME. Participants with significant refractive errors (myopia > -6.0 diopters or hyperopia > +3.0 diopters), vitreous hemorrhage, tractional retinal detachment, or other ocular diseases affecting imaging were excluded. Spectral-domain OCT was performed by a single examiner using both devices to capture macular volume scans under mydriasis. Central macular thickness (CMT) was evaluated using the analysis software for each device: Cirrus used version 6.0.4, and ACT100 used version V20. We analyzed inter-evaluator and inter-instrument agreements for qualitative assessments of the intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and epiretinal membrane (ERM) using Cohen's kappa coefficient, whereas quantitative CMT assessments were correlated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. <b>Results:</b> Substantial inter-evaluator agreement for IRF/SRF (κ = 0.801) and ERM (κ = 0.688) with ACT100 and inter-instrument agreement (κ = 0.756 for IRF/SRF, κ = 0.684 for ERM) were observed. CMT values measured using ACT100 were on average 29.6 μm lower than that of Cirrus (285.8 ± 56.6 vs. 315.4 ± 84.7 μm, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) but showed a strong correlation (R = 0.76, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). <b>Conclusions:</b> ACT100 portable OCT demonstrated high reliability for DME evaluations, comparable to that of stationary systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"volume\":\"17 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11510131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceuticals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101357\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17101357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)会导致视力损伤和重大视力损失。便携式光学相干断层扫描(OCT)有望提高 DME 筛查的可及性和频率,促进早期诊断和持续监测。本研究旨在评估便携式 OCT 设备(ACT100)与传统固定式 OCT 设备(Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT plus)相比,在评估 DME 方面的可靠性。方法:这项前瞻性临床研究包括 33 名 DME 患者的 40 只眼睛。排除了有明显屈光不正(近视 > -6.0 度或远视 > +3.0 度)、玻璃体出血、牵引性视网膜脱离或其他影响成像的眼部疾病的患者。光谱域 OCT 由一名检查人员使用两台设备进行,以捕捉昏迷状态下的黄斑体积扫描。黄斑中心厚度(CMT)使用每种设备的分析软件进行评估:Cirrus 使用 6.0.4 版,ACT100 使用 V20 版。我们使用科恩卡帕系数分析了评估者之间和仪器之间对视网膜内积液(IRF)、视网膜下积液(SRF)和视网膜外膜(ERM)定性评估的一致性,并使用斯皮尔曼相关系数对 CMT 定量评估进行了相关分析。结果:使用 ACT100 测量 IRF/SRF (κ = 0.801) 和 ERM (κ = 0.688) 时,观察到评估者之间有很大的一致性,仪器之间也有一致性(IRF/SRF κ = 0.756,ERM κ = 0.684)。使用 ACT100 测量的 CMT 值比 Cirrus 测量的 CMT 值平均低 29.6 μm(285.8 ± 56.6 vs. 315.4 ± 84.7 μm,p < 0.0001),但显示出很强的相关性(R = 0.76,p < 0.0001)。结论ACT100 便携式 OCT 在评估 DME 方面表现出很高的可靠性,与固定式系统不相上下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of the Reproducibility of Portable Optical Coherence Tomography in Diabetic Macular Edema.

Background: Diabetic macular edema (DME) causes vision impairment and significant vision loss. Portable optical coherence tomography (OCT) has the potential to enhance the accessibility and frequency of DME screening, facilitating early diagnosis and continuous monitoring. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a portable OCT device (ACT100) in assessing DME compared with a traditional stationary OCT device (Cirrus 5000 HD-OCT plus). Methods: This prospective clinical investigation included 40 eyes of 33 patients with DME. Participants with significant refractive errors (myopia > -6.0 diopters or hyperopia > +3.0 diopters), vitreous hemorrhage, tractional retinal detachment, or other ocular diseases affecting imaging were excluded. Spectral-domain OCT was performed by a single examiner using both devices to capture macular volume scans under mydriasis. Central macular thickness (CMT) was evaluated using the analysis software for each device: Cirrus used version 6.0.4, and ACT100 used version V20. We analyzed inter-evaluator and inter-instrument agreements for qualitative assessments of the intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and epiretinal membrane (ERM) using Cohen's kappa coefficient, whereas quantitative CMT assessments were correlated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: Substantial inter-evaluator agreement for IRF/SRF (κ = 0.801) and ERM (κ = 0.688) with ACT100 and inter-instrument agreement (κ = 0.756 for IRF/SRF, κ = 0.684 for ERM) were observed. CMT values measured using ACT100 were on average 29.6 μm lower than that of Cirrus (285.8 ± 56.6 vs. 315.4 ± 84.7 μm, p < 0.0001) but showed a strong correlation (R = 0.76, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: ACT100 portable OCT demonstrated high reliability for DME evaluations, comparable to that of stationary systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
1332
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247) is an international scientific journal of medicinal chemistry and related drug sciences.Our aim is to publish updated reviews as well as research articles with comprehensive theoretical and experimental details. Short communications are also accepted; therefore, there is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers.
期刊最新文献
Novel Dual Acetyl- and Butyrylcholinesterase Inhibitors Based on the Pyridyl-Pyridazine Moiety for the Potential Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease. Antidepressant-like Effects of Cannabis sativa L. Extract in an Lipopolysaccharide Model: Modulation of Mast Cell Activation in Deep Cervical Lymph Nodes and Dura Mater. Extraction, Purification, Characterization, and Wound Healing Effects of Novel Prickly Pear (Opuntiaficus-indica (L.) Mill.) Heteropolysaccharides. Glutathione Modulates Hydrogen Sulfide Release and the Ocular Hypotensive Action of Diallyl Polysulfide Compounds. Evaluation of Mucoadhesive Nano-Bilosomal In Situ Gels Containing Anti-Psychotic Clozapine for Treatment of Schizophrenia: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1