鼻腔粘膜层(LOEM)系统:内窥镜鼻窦手术的新分类方法。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin24.370
S Sanchez-Gomez, R Moreno-Luna, D Martin-Jimenez, J Maza-Solano, A Del Cuvillo, J-M Villacampa-Auba, J Gonzalez-Garcia, R Fernandez-Liesa, I Alobid, M Bernal-Sprekelsen
{"title":"鼻腔粘膜层(LOEM)系统:内窥镜鼻窦手术的新分类方法。","authors":"S Sanchez-Gomez, R Moreno-Luna, D Martin-Jimenez, J Maza-Solano, A Del Cuvillo, J-M Villacampa-Auba, J Gonzalez-Garcia, R Fernandez-Liesa, I Alobid, M Bernal-Sprekelsen","doi":"10.4193/Rhin24.370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last decades, various types of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have emerged as treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), particularly with the development of personalized, endotype-driven approaches targeting mucosal inflammation and remodeling. Despite these advancements, the literature reports heterogeneous and often divergent outcomes, leaving the actual benefit of more extensive surgical approaches in CRS control a matter of ongoing debate. This discrepancy stems from inconsistent definitions of surgical techniques, leading to variations in osseous and mucosal resections depending on patient phenotype, disease severity and surgeon preference. To address this inconsistency, the Japanese Rhinology Society introduced a classification based on procedure extent, but it lacks details on anatomical structures and mucosal treatment. Similarly, the ACCESS system measures ESS extent with postoperative CT-scans but overlooks mucosal interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":" ","pages":"125-128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lamella Ostium Extent Mucosa (LOEM) system: a new classification for endoscopic sinus surgery.\",\"authors\":\"S Sanchez-Gomez, R Moreno-Luna, D Martin-Jimenez, J Maza-Solano, A Del Cuvillo, J-M Villacampa-Auba, J Gonzalez-Garcia, R Fernandez-Liesa, I Alobid, M Bernal-Sprekelsen\",\"doi\":\"10.4193/Rhin24.370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the last decades, various types of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have emerged as treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), particularly with the development of personalized, endotype-driven approaches targeting mucosal inflammation and remodeling. Despite these advancements, the literature reports heterogeneous and often divergent outcomes, leaving the actual benefit of more extensive surgical approaches in CRS control a matter of ongoing debate. This discrepancy stems from inconsistent definitions of surgical techniques, leading to variations in osseous and mucosal resections depending on patient phenotype, disease severity and surgeon preference. To address this inconsistency, the Japanese Rhinology Society introduced a classification based on procedure extent, but it lacks details on anatomical structures and mucosal treatment. Similarly, the ACCESS system measures ESS extent with postoperative CT-scans but overlooks mucosal interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"125-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.370\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin24.370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,各种类型的内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)已成为慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的治疗方法,特别是随着针对粘膜炎症和重塑的个性化内型驱动方法的发展(1)。尽管取得了这些进展,但文献报道的结果却不尽相同,而且往往存在分歧,因此,更广泛的手术方法对 CRS 控制的实际益处仍是一个争论不休的问题(2,3)。这种差异源于手术技术定义的不一致,导致骨切除和粘膜切除因患者表型、疾病严重程度和外科医生的偏好而异(4)。为解决这一不一致问题,日本鼻科学会引入了基于手术范围的分类,但缺乏解剖结构和粘膜治疗的详细信息(5)。同样,ACCESS 系统通过术后 CT 扫描来衡量 ESS 的范围,但忽略了粘膜干预(6)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Lamella Ostium Extent Mucosa (LOEM) system: a new classification for endoscopic sinus surgery.

In the last decades, various types of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have emerged as treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), particularly with the development of personalized, endotype-driven approaches targeting mucosal inflammation and remodeling. Despite these advancements, the literature reports heterogeneous and often divergent outcomes, leaving the actual benefit of more extensive surgical approaches in CRS control a matter of ongoing debate. This discrepancy stems from inconsistent definitions of surgical techniques, leading to variations in osseous and mucosal resections depending on patient phenotype, disease severity and surgeon preference. To address this inconsistency, the Japanese Rhinology Society introduced a classification based on procedure extent, but it lacks details on anatomical structures and mucosal treatment. Similarly, the ACCESS system measures ESS extent with postoperative CT-scans but overlooks mucosal interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Is nasal closure an effective treatment for severe refractory epistaxis in HHT? A scoping review and narrative synthesis. Analysis of nasal fracture management and subsequent surgical outcomes across demographics. Omalizumab reduces allergic rhinitis symptoms due to Japanese cedar pollen by improving eosinophilic inflammation. Normative data for the lateralization task in the assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Nasal endoscopy score thresholds to trigger consideration of chronic rhinosinusitis treatment escalation and implications for disease control.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1