通过自述症状和心血管风险评分对大师级运动员进行赛前心血管评估的价值。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1080/14017431.2024.2418089
Jostein Grimsmo, Kristina Hermann Haugaa, Ivan Popovic, Øyvind Haugen Lie, Erik Ekker Solberg
{"title":"通过自述症状和心血管风险评分对大师级运动员进行赛前心血管评估的价值。","authors":"Jostein Grimsmo, Kristina Hermann Haugaa, Ivan Popovic, Øyvind Haugen Lie, Erik Ekker Solberg","doi":"10.1080/14017431.2024.2418089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is increased during endurance competitive sports. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of SCD in master athletes ≥ 35 years old (MAs). To reduce the risk of SCD self-assessment of symptoms by questionnaire, and evaluation of cardiovascular risk-score, are recommended as pre-participation cardiovascular evaluation (PCVE). We aimed to examine whether PCVE predicts CVD in MAs with or without increased risk as measured by validated score instruments.</p><p><p>We performed a single-site observational cohort study of healthy MAs based on findings at PCVE. They were allocated in two different groups: those MAs with reported symptoms on the questionnaire and/or with elevated cardiovascular risk score were allocated to a symptom group (SG), while MAs with no symptoms, nor raised risk score were defined as control group (CG). Thereafter, all were examined with extended examinations: resting-ECG, cardiorespiratory exercise testing and echocardiography.</p><p><p>Total, 81 (18 women) MAs participated in the study. There were no differences at baseline between SG (<i>n</i> = 39) and CG (<i>n</i> = 42); sex (<i>p</i> = 0.11), age (55.0 ± 9.8 vs. 51.9 ± 11.1 years; <i>p</i> = 0.18), maximal oxygen uptake (49.8 ± 7.6 vs. 51.6 ± 7.0 ml/kg/min; <i>p</i> = 0.26), resting heart rate (61.4 ± 12.8 vs. 60.2 ± 11.0/min; <i>p</i> = 0.66), training hours/week (7.0 ± 3.2 vs. 7.1 ± 3.1; <i>p</i> = 0.88). After further examination, sixteen (20%) MAs were found with CVD: 12 in SG, 4 in CG (<i>p</i> = 0.024). The negative predictive value and specificity of the PCVE were 90% and 58%, respectively.</p><p><p>Negative findings on PCVE by questionnaire and cardiovascular risk-score may be a strategy to exclude subjects from preparticipation screening, thus saving resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":21383,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","volume":"58 1","pages":"2418089"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value of preparticipation cardiovascular evaluation of master athletes by self-reported symptoms and cardiovascular risk-score.\",\"authors\":\"Jostein Grimsmo, Kristina Hermann Haugaa, Ivan Popovic, Øyvind Haugen Lie, Erik Ekker Solberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14017431.2024.2418089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is increased during endurance competitive sports. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of SCD in master athletes ≥ 35 years old (MAs). To reduce the risk of SCD self-assessment of symptoms by questionnaire, and evaluation of cardiovascular risk-score, are recommended as pre-participation cardiovascular evaluation (PCVE). We aimed to examine whether PCVE predicts CVD in MAs with or without increased risk as measured by validated score instruments.</p><p><p>We performed a single-site observational cohort study of healthy MAs based on findings at PCVE. They were allocated in two different groups: those MAs with reported symptoms on the questionnaire and/or with elevated cardiovascular risk score were allocated to a symptom group (SG), while MAs with no symptoms, nor raised risk score were defined as control group (CG). Thereafter, all were examined with extended examinations: resting-ECG, cardiorespiratory exercise testing and echocardiography.</p><p><p>Total, 81 (18 women) MAs participated in the study. There were no differences at baseline between SG (<i>n</i> = 39) and CG (<i>n</i> = 42); sex (<i>p</i> = 0.11), age (55.0 ± 9.8 vs. 51.9 ± 11.1 years; <i>p</i> = 0.18), maximal oxygen uptake (49.8 ± 7.6 vs. 51.6 ± 7.0 ml/kg/min; <i>p</i> = 0.26), resting heart rate (61.4 ± 12.8 vs. 60.2 ± 11.0/min; <i>p</i> = 0.66), training hours/week (7.0 ± 3.2 vs. 7.1 ± 3.1; <i>p</i> = 0.88). After further examination, sixteen (20%) MAs were found with CVD: 12 in SG, 4 in CG (<i>p</i> = 0.024). The negative predictive value and specificity of the PCVE were 90% and 58%, respectively.</p><p><p>Negative findings on PCVE by questionnaire and cardiovascular risk-score may be a strategy to exclude subjects from preparticipation screening, thus saving resources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"2418089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2024.2418089\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2024.2418089","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在耐力竞技运动中,心脏性猝死(SCD)的风险会增加。冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是导致年龄超过 35 岁的大师级运动员(MAs)发生 SCD 的最常见原因。为降低 SCD 风险,建议在参赛前进行心血管评估(PCVE),通过问卷对症状进行自我评估,并评估心血管风险分数。我们的目的是研究 PCVE 是否能预测心血管疾病风险增加或未增加的健康体检者的心血管疾病风险(通过有效的评分工具进行测量)。我们根据 PCVE 的结果对健康的 MA 进行了单点观察性队列研究,并将他们分为两组:在问卷中报告有症状和/或心血管风险评分升高的 MA 被分为症状组 (SG),而没有症状或风险评分升高的 MA 被定义为对照组 (CG)。之后,所有人员都接受了扩展检查:静息心电图、心肺运动测试和超声心动图。SG(39 人)和 CG(42 人)在基线、性别(p = 0.11)、年龄(55.0 ± 9.8 岁 vs. 51.9 ± 11.1 岁;p = 0.18)、最大摄氧量(49.8 ± 7.6 vs. 51.6 ± 7.0 ml/kg/min;p = 0.26)、静息心率(61.4 ± 12.8 vs. 60.2 ± 11.0/min;p = 0.66)、每周训练时数(7.0 ± 3.2 vs. 7.1 ± 3.1;p = 0.88)。进一步检查发现,16 名 MA(20%)患有心血管疾病:其中 12 例为 SG,4 例为 CG(P = 0.024)。PCVE的阴性预测值和特异性分别为90%和58%。通过问卷调查和心血管风险评分得出的阴性PCVE结果可能是将受试者排除在赛前筛查之外的一种策略,从而节省了资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value of preparticipation cardiovascular evaluation of master athletes by self-reported symptoms and cardiovascular risk-score.

The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is increased during endurance competitive sports. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of SCD in master athletes ≥ 35 years old (MAs). To reduce the risk of SCD self-assessment of symptoms by questionnaire, and evaluation of cardiovascular risk-score, are recommended as pre-participation cardiovascular evaluation (PCVE). We aimed to examine whether PCVE predicts CVD in MAs with or without increased risk as measured by validated score instruments.

We performed a single-site observational cohort study of healthy MAs based on findings at PCVE. They were allocated in two different groups: those MAs with reported symptoms on the questionnaire and/or with elevated cardiovascular risk score were allocated to a symptom group (SG), while MAs with no symptoms, nor raised risk score were defined as control group (CG). Thereafter, all were examined with extended examinations: resting-ECG, cardiorespiratory exercise testing and echocardiography.

Total, 81 (18 women) MAs participated in the study. There were no differences at baseline between SG (n = 39) and CG (n = 42); sex (p = 0.11), age (55.0 ± 9.8 vs. 51.9 ± 11.1 years; p = 0.18), maximal oxygen uptake (49.8 ± 7.6 vs. 51.6 ± 7.0 ml/kg/min; p = 0.26), resting heart rate (61.4 ± 12.8 vs. 60.2 ± 11.0/min; p = 0.66), training hours/week (7.0 ± 3.2 vs. 7.1 ± 3.1; p = 0.88). After further examination, sixteen (20%) MAs were found with CVD: 12 in SG, 4 in CG (p = 0.024). The negative predictive value and specificity of the PCVE were 90% and 58%, respectively.

Negative findings on PCVE by questionnaire and cardiovascular risk-score may be a strategy to exclude subjects from preparticipation screening, thus saving resources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal is to promote cardiovascular research that crosses the borders between disciplines. The journal is a forum for the entire field of cardiovascular research, basic and clinical including: • Cardiology - Interventional and non-invasive • Cardiovascular epidemiology • Cardiovascular anaesthesia and intensive care • Cardiovascular surgery • Cardiovascular radiology • Clinical physiology • Transplantation of thoracic organs
期刊最新文献
CircFNDC3B inhibits vascular smooth muscle cells proliferation in abdominal aortic aneurysms by targeting the miR-1270/PDCD10 axis. The efficacy of colchicine compared to placebo for preventing ischemic stroke among individuals with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multivariate and survival analysis of prognosis and surgical benefits in infective endocarditis. The use of antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation in Finland 2007-2018. The effect of COVID-19 on cardiovascular function and exercise tolerance in healthy middle-age and older individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1