心肺理疗对中风患者肺功能的影响:网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2024.2417647
So-Hyun Kim, Sung-Hyoun Cho
{"title":"心肺理疗对中风患者肺功能的影响:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"So-Hyun Kim, Sung-Hyoun Cho","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2417647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of various physiotherapy interventions for improving lung function has not been compared.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate cardiorespiratory physiotherapy interventions on lung function in patients with stroke, prioritize intervention types, and establish hierarchy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve randomized controlled trials published during 2000-2022 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were selected. Interventions included aerobic training (AT), combined inspiratory and expiratory training (CIET), inspiratory training (IT), combined aerobic and breadth training (CABT), and conventional training (CT). Outcome variables were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CIET and IT were more effective than CT for FEV1 and FVC. CIET and IT showed larger effect sizes compared to AT for FEV1. The intervention rankings were as follows: IT (86.62%), CIET (63.31%), CABT (50.79%), AT (28.72%), and CT (20.55%) for FEV1; IT (93.89%), CIET (75.06%), CT (42.38%), CABT (37.73%), and AT (0.94%) for FVC; and IT (78.30%), CT (54.14%), CABT (42.62%), CIET (41.65%), and AT (33.29%) for FEV1/FVC. CIET and IT were more effective than CT for FVC in patients with stroke aged ≥60 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Besides FEV1/FVC, IT and CIET inhalation exercises improved lung function more effectively than other therapies, with IT or CIET being more effective than AT or CT. CIET and IT were more effective than CT for FVC in patients with stroke aged ≥60 years than in those <60 years. These findings highlight the significance of breathing training for patients with stroke and support clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy on lung function in stroke: a network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"So-Hyun Kim, Sung-Hyoun Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2417647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of various physiotherapy interventions for improving lung function has not been compared.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate cardiorespiratory physiotherapy interventions on lung function in patients with stroke, prioritize intervention types, and establish hierarchy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve randomized controlled trials published during 2000-2022 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were selected. Interventions included aerobic training (AT), combined inspiratory and expiratory training (CIET), inspiratory training (IT), combined aerobic and breadth training (CABT), and conventional training (CT). Outcome variables were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CIET and IT were more effective than CT for FEV1 and FVC. CIET and IT showed larger effect sizes compared to AT for FEV1. The intervention rankings were as follows: IT (86.62%), CIET (63.31%), CABT (50.79%), AT (28.72%), and CT (20.55%) for FEV1; IT (93.89%), CIET (75.06%), CT (42.38%), CABT (37.73%), and AT (0.94%) for FVC; and IT (78.30%), CT (54.14%), CABT (42.62%), CIET (41.65%), and AT (33.29%) for FEV1/FVC. CIET and IT were more effective than CT for FVC in patients with stroke aged ≥60 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Besides FEV1/FVC, IT and CIET inhalation exercises improved lung function more effectively than other therapies, with IT or CIET being more effective than AT or CT. CIET and IT were more effective than CT for FVC in patients with stroke aged ≥60 years than in those <60 years. These findings highlight the significance of breathing training for patients with stroke and support clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2417647\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2417647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:各种物理治疗干预对改善肺功能的效果尚未进行比较:评估心肺物理治疗干预对脑卒中患者肺功能的影响,确定干预类型的优先顺序,并建立分级体系:方法:选取 2000-2022 年间在 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 上发表的 12 项随机对照试验。干预措施包括有氧训练(AT)、吸气和呼气联合训练(CIET)、吸气训练(IT)、有氧和广度联合训练(CABT)以及常规训练(CT)。结果变量为 1 秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)和 FEV1/FVC:在 FEV1 和 FVC 方面,CIET 和 IT 比 CT 更有效。就 FEV1 而言,CIET 和 IT 比 AT 显示出更大的效应量。干预排名如下在 FEV1 方面,IT(86.62%)、CIET(63.31%)、CABT(50.79%)、AT(28.72%)和 CT(20.55%);在 FVC 方面,IT(93.89%)、CIET(75.06%)、CT(42.38%)、CABT(37.73%)和 AT(0.94%);在 FEV1/FVC 方面,IT(78.30%)、CT(54.14%)、CABT(42.62%)、CIET(41.65%)和 AT(33.29%)。对于年龄≥60 岁的脑卒中患者,CIET 和 IT 比 CT 对 FVC 更有效:结论:除 FEV1/FVC 外,IT 和 CIET 吸入训练比其他疗法更有效地改善肺功能,IT 或 CIET 比 AT 或 CT 更有效。与 CT 相比,CIET 和 IT 对年龄≥60 岁的脑卒中患者的 FVC 更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy on lung function in stroke: a network meta-analysis.

Background: The efficacy of various physiotherapy interventions for improving lung function has not been compared.

Objectives: To evaluate cardiorespiratory physiotherapy interventions on lung function in patients with stroke, prioritize intervention types, and establish hierarchy.

Methods: Twelve randomized controlled trials published during 2000-2022 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were selected. Interventions included aerobic training (AT), combined inspiratory and expiratory training (CIET), inspiratory training (IT), combined aerobic and breadth training (CABT), and conventional training (CT). Outcome variables were forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC.

Results: CIET and IT were more effective than CT for FEV1 and FVC. CIET and IT showed larger effect sizes compared to AT for FEV1. The intervention rankings were as follows: IT (86.62%), CIET (63.31%), CABT (50.79%), AT (28.72%), and CT (20.55%) for FEV1; IT (93.89%), CIET (75.06%), CT (42.38%), CABT (37.73%), and AT (0.94%) for FVC; and IT (78.30%), CT (54.14%), CABT (42.62%), CIET (41.65%), and AT (33.29%) for FEV1/FVC. CIET and IT were more effective than CT for FVC in patients with stroke aged ≥60 years.

Conclusions: Besides FEV1/FVC, IT and CIET inhalation exercises improved lung function more effectively than other therapies, with IT or CIET being more effective than AT or CT. CIET and IT were more effective than CT for FVC in patients with stroke aged ≥60 years than in those <60 years. These findings highlight the significance of breathing training for patients with stroke and support clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Lateropulsion resolution and outcomes up to one year post-stroke: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study. The effects of kinesiophobia, fatigue, and quality of life on physical activity in patients with stroke. Cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and fatigue three months after first-ever ischemic stroke. Turkish cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the stroke activity scale in individuals with Hemiparesis. Defining tibial anterior muscle morphology in first-ever chronic stroke patients using three-dimensional freehand ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1