腹部微创手术全身麻醉期间的驱动压力(GENERATOR)--随机临床试验的研究方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Trials Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08479-x
{"title":"腹部微创手术全身麻醉期间的驱动压力(GENERATOR)--随机临床试验的研究方案。","authors":"","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08479-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative driving pressure (ΔP) has an independent association with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving ventilation during general anesthesia for major surgery. Ventilation with high intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers (RMs) that result in a low ΔP has the potential to prevent PPCs. This trial tests the hypothesis that compared to standard low PEEP without RMs, an individualized high PEEP strategy, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs prevents PPCs in patients receiving intraoperative protective ventilation during anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\"DrivinG prEssure duriNg gEneRal AnesThesia fOr minimally invasive abdominal suRgery (GENERATOR)\" is an international, multicenter, two-group, patient and outcome-assessor blinded randomized clinical trial. In total, 1806 adult patients scheduled for minimally invasive abdominal surgery and with an increased risk of PPCs based on (i) the ARISCAT risk score for PPCs (≥ 26 points) and/or (ii) a combination of age > 40 years and scheduled surgery lasting > 2 h and planned to receive an intra-arterial catheter for blood pressure monitoring during the surgery will be included. Patients are assigned to either an intraoperative ventilation strategy with individualized high PEEP, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs or one with a standard low PEEP of 5 cm H<sub>2</sub>O without RMs. The primary outcome is a collapsed composite endpoint of PPCs until postoperative day 5.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>GENERATOR will be the first adequately powered randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of individualized high PEEP with RMs versus standard low PEEP without RMs on the occurrence of PPCs after minimally invasive abdominal surgery. The results of the GENERATOR trial will support anesthesiologists in their decisions regarding PEEP settings during minimally invasive abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>GENERATOR is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (study identifier: NCT06101511) on 26 October 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Driving pressure during general anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery (GENERATOR)-study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08479-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intraoperative driving pressure (ΔP) has an independent association with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving ventilation during general anesthesia for major surgery. Ventilation with high intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers (RMs) that result in a low ΔP has the potential to prevent PPCs. This trial tests the hypothesis that compared to standard low PEEP without RMs, an individualized high PEEP strategy, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs prevents PPCs in patients receiving intraoperative protective ventilation during anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>\\\"DrivinG prEssure duriNg gEneRal AnesThesia fOr minimally invasive abdominal suRgery (GENERATOR)\\\" is an international, multicenter, two-group, patient and outcome-assessor blinded randomized clinical trial. In total, 1806 adult patients scheduled for minimally invasive abdominal surgery and with an increased risk of PPCs based on (i) the ARISCAT risk score for PPCs (≥ 26 points) and/or (ii) a combination of age > 40 years and scheduled surgery lasting > 2 h and planned to receive an intra-arterial catheter for blood pressure monitoring during the surgery will be included. Patients are assigned to either an intraoperative ventilation strategy with individualized high PEEP, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs or one with a standard low PEEP of 5 cm H<sub>2</sub>O without RMs. The primary outcome is a collapsed composite endpoint of PPCs until postoperative day 5.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>GENERATOR will be the first adequately powered randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of individualized high PEEP with RMs versus standard low PEEP without RMs on the occurrence of PPCs after minimally invasive abdominal surgery. The results of the GENERATOR trial will support anesthesiologists in their decisions regarding PEEP settings during minimally invasive abdominal surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>GENERATOR is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (study identifier: NCT06101511) on 26 October 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08479-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08479-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术中驱动压力(ΔP)与接受全身麻醉通气的大手术患者术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的发生有独立联系。术中使用高呼气末正压(PEEP)和可导致低ΔP 的招募动作(RMs)进行通气有可能预防肺并发症。本试验验证了以下假设:与标准的低 PEEP(不带 RMs)相比,个体化的高 PEEP 策略(滴定到最低 ΔP)加上 RMs 可预防腹部微创手术麻醉期间接受术中保护性通气的患者发生 PPC:"DrivinG prEssure duriNg gEneRal AnesThesia fOr minimally invasive abdominal suRgery (GENERATOR) "是一项国际多中心、两组、患者和结果评估者盲法随机临床试验。共有 1806 名计划接受腹部微创手术的成年患者将被纳入该试验,这些患者均具有以下特征:(i) PPCs 的 ARISCAT 风险评分(≥ 26 分)和/或 (ii) 年龄大于 40 岁,计划手术时间大于 2 小时,且计划在手术期间接受动脉内导管进行血压监测。患者将被分配至两种术中通气策略,一种是采用个体化高 PEEP(调节至最低 ΔP),并使用 RMs;另一种是采用 5 cm H2O 的标准低 PEEP,但不使用 RMs。主要结果是术后第 5 天前的 PPCs 折叠复合终点:讨论:GENERATOR 将是第一项有充分证据支持的随机临床试验,用于比较带 RM 的个性化高 PEEP 与不带 RM 的标准低 PEEP 对腹部微创手术后 PPCs 发生率的影响。GENERATOR 试验的结果将为麻醉医师在腹部微创手术中决定 PEEP 设置提供支持:GENERATOR已于2023年10月26日在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册(研究标识符:NCT06101511)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Driving pressure during general anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery (GENERATOR)-study protocol of a randomized clinical trial.

Background: Intraoperative driving pressure (ΔP) has an independent association with the development of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients receiving ventilation during general anesthesia for major surgery. Ventilation with high intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers (RMs) that result in a low ΔP has the potential to prevent PPCs. This trial tests the hypothesis that compared to standard low PEEP without RMs, an individualized high PEEP strategy, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs prevents PPCs in patients receiving intraoperative protective ventilation during anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery.

Methods: "DrivinG prEssure duriNg gEneRal AnesThesia fOr minimally invasive abdominal suRgery (GENERATOR)" is an international, multicenter, two-group, patient and outcome-assessor blinded randomized clinical trial. In total, 1806 adult patients scheduled for minimally invasive abdominal surgery and with an increased risk of PPCs based on (i) the ARISCAT risk score for PPCs (≥ 26 points) and/or (ii) a combination of age > 40 years and scheduled surgery lasting > 2 h and planned to receive an intra-arterial catheter for blood pressure monitoring during the surgery will be included. Patients are assigned to either an intraoperative ventilation strategy with individualized high PEEP, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with RMs or one with a standard low PEEP of 5 cm H2O without RMs. The primary outcome is a collapsed composite endpoint of PPCs until postoperative day 5.

Discussion: GENERATOR will be the first adequately powered randomized clinical trial to compare the effects of individualized high PEEP with RMs versus standard low PEEP without RMs on the occurrence of PPCs after minimally invasive abdominal surgery. The results of the GENERATOR trial will support anesthesiologists in their decisions regarding PEEP settings during minimally invasive abdominal surgery.

Trial registration: GENERATOR is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (study identifier: NCT06101511) on 26 October 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
期刊最新文献
Effect of a patient health engagement (PHE) model on rehabilitation participation in patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Evaluating effects of meal delivery on the ability of homebound older adults to remain in the community via a pragmatic, two-arm, randomized comparative effectiveness trial: study protocol for the Deliver-EE trial. Prochlorperazine maleate versus placebo for the prevention of acute mountain sickness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Interventions to modify the habituation of biological responses to repeated stress in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial. Integrating habit science and learning theory to promote maintenance of behavior change: does adding text messages to a habit-based sleep health intervention (HABITs) improve outcomes for eveningness chronotype young adults? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1