突尼斯慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化无创评估的 GPR 评分性能。

Q3 Medicine Tunisie Medicale Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5091
Ikbel Ghachem, Lamine Hamzaoui, Asma Bachali, Chayma Rhimi, Mouna Medhioub, Moufida Mahmoudi, Amal Khsiba, Mohamed Msaddak Azouz
{"title":"突尼斯慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化无创评估的 GPR 评分性能。","authors":"Ikbel Ghachem, Lamine Hamzaoui, Asma Bachali, Chayma Rhimi, Mouna Medhioub, Moufida Mahmoudi, Amal Khsiba, Mohamed Msaddak Azouz","doi":"10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several non-invasive tests (NIT) have been reported for predicting liver fibrosis to avoid percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the performance of NIT in Tunisian patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated the ASAT/platelet ratio index (APRI), GGT-to-platelet ratio (GPR), Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and RDW/platelet ratio (RPR). The accuracy of NIT was compared with the Metavir score for the detection of liver fibrosis stage using the area under the ROC curves (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven CHB patients were included. For predicting significant fibrosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.81; CI95% [0.68-0.93]; P < 0.001) was significantly higher than that of RPR (0.67; CI95% [0.52-0.82]; P = 0.03) and FIB-4 (0.746; CI95% [0.61-0.88]; P = 0.002), but was similar to APRI (0.88; CI95% [0.79-0.97]; P < 0.001). For advanced fibrosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.93; CI95% [0.84-1]; P < 0.001) was higher than that of RPR (0.83; CI95% [0.69-0.97]; P < 0.001) and FIB-4 (0.88; CI95% [0.76-0.99]; P < 0.001), but similar to APRI (0.93; CI95% [0.87-0.99]; P < 0.001). For predicting cirrhosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.98; CI95% [0.95-1]; P < 0.001) was higher than that of APRI (0.95; CI95% [0.90-1]; P = 0.02), similar to RPR (0.99; CI95% [0.98-1]; P < 0.001) but lower than that of FIB-4 (1; CI95% [1-1]; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, APRI (OR = 3.78; P = 0.002) and FIB-4 (OR = 2.65; P = 0.01) were independent predictors of significant fibrosis. GPR was the only independent predictor of advanced fibrosis (OR = 4.64; P = 0.001) and FIB-4 was the independent predictor of cirrhosis (OR = 2.85; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPR does not demonstrate significant advantages over APRI, FIB-4, and RPR in identifying liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":"102 10","pages":"715-721"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of GPR score for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B Tunisian patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ikbel Ghachem, Lamine Hamzaoui, Asma Bachali, Chayma Rhimi, Mouna Medhioub, Moufida Mahmoudi, Amal Khsiba, Mohamed Msaddak Azouz\",\"doi\":\"10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several non-invasive tests (NIT) have been reported for predicting liver fibrosis to avoid percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the performance of NIT in Tunisian patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated the ASAT/platelet ratio index (APRI), GGT-to-platelet ratio (GPR), Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and RDW/platelet ratio (RPR). The accuracy of NIT was compared with the Metavir score for the detection of liver fibrosis stage using the area under the ROC curves (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven CHB patients were included. For predicting significant fibrosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.81; CI95% [0.68-0.93]; P < 0.001) was significantly higher than that of RPR (0.67; CI95% [0.52-0.82]; P = 0.03) and FIB-4 (0.746; CI95% [0.61-0.88]; P = 0.002), but was similar to APRI (0.88; CI95% [0.79-0.97]; P < 0.001). For advanced fibrosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.93; CI95% [0.84-1]; P < 0.001) was higher than that of RPR (0.83; CI95% [0.69-0.97]; P < 0.001) and FIB-4 (0.88; CI95% [0.76-0.99]; P < 0.001), but similar to APRI (0.93; CI95% [0.87-0.99]; P < 0.001). For predicting cirrhosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.98; CI95% [0.95-1]; P < 0.001) was higher than that of APRI (0.95; CI95% [0.90-1]; P = 0.02), similar to RPR (0.99; CI95% [0.98-1]; P < 0.001) but lower than that of FIB-4 (1; CI95% [1-1]; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, APRI (OR = 3.78; P = 0.002) and FIB-4 (OR = 2.65; P = 0.01) were independent predictors of significant fibrosis. GPR was the only independent predictor of advanced fibrosis (OR = 4.64; P = 0.001) and FIB-4 was the independent predictor of cirrhosis (OR = 2.85; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GPR does not demonstrate significant advantages over APRI, FIB-4, and RPR in identifying liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunisie Medicale\",\"volume\":\"102 10\",\"pages\":\"715-721\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunisie Medicale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:据报道,有几种无创检验(NIT)可预测肝纤维化,从而避免经皮肝活检(PLB):目的:评估突尼斯慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者的无创检测性能:我们计算了 ASAT/血小板比率指数 (APRI)、GGT-血小板比率 (GPR)、纤维化-4 评分 (FIB-4) 和 RDW/血小板比率 (RPR)。使用 ROC 曲线下面积(AUROC)比较了 NIT 与 Metavir 评分检测肝纤维化分期的准确性:结果:共纳入 77 例慢性乙型肝炎患者。在预测明显肝纤维化方面,GPR的AUROC(0.81;CI95% [0.68-0.93];P < 0.001)明显高于RPR(0.67;CI95% [0.52-0.82];P = 0.03)和FIB-4(0.746;CI95% [0.61-0.88];P = 0.002),但与APRI(0.88;CI95% [0.79-0.97];P < 0.001)相似。对于晚期纤维化,GPR的AUROC(0.93;CI95% [0.84-1];P <0.001)高于RPR(0.83;CI95% [0.69-0.97];P <0.001)和FIB-4(0.88;CI95% [0.76-0.99];P <0.001),但与APRI(0.93;CI95% [0.87-0.99];P <0.001)相似。在预测肝硬化方面,GPR(0.98;CI95% [0.95-1];P <0.001)的AUROC高于APRI(0.95;CI95% [0.90-1];P = 0.02),与RPR(0.99;CI95% [0.98-1];P <0.001)相似,但低于FIB-4(1;CI95% [1-1];P <0.001)。在多变量分析中,APRI(OR = 3.78;P = 0.002)和 FIB-4(OR = 2.65;P = 0.01)是显著纤维化的独立预测因子。GPR是晚期纤维化的唯一独立预测指标(OR = 4.64;P = 0.001),FIB-4是肝硬化的独立预测指标(OR = 2.85;P < 0.001):结论:在识别慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者肝纤维化方面,GPR与APRI、FIB-4和RPR相比没有明显优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of GPR score for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B Tunisian patients.

Introduction: Several non-invasive tests (NIT) have been reported for predicting liver fibrosis to avoid percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB).

Aim: To evaluate the performance of NIT in Tunisian patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Methods: We calculated the ASAT/platelet ratio index (APRI), GGT-to-platelet ratio (GPR), Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and RDW/platelet ratio (RPR). The accuracy of NIT was compared with the Metavir score for the detection of liver fibrosis stage using the area under the ROC curves (AUROC).

Results: Seventy-seven CHB patients were included. For predicting significant fibrosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.81; CI95% [0.68-0.93]; P < 0.001) was significantly higher than that of RPR (0.67; CI95% [0.52-0.82]; P = 0.03) and FIB-4 (0.746; CI95% [0.61-0.88]; P = 0.002), but was similar to APRI (0.88; CI95% [0.79-0.97]; P < 0.001). For advanced fibrosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.93; CI95% [0.84-1]; P < 0.001) was higher than that of RPR (0.83; CI95% [0.69-0.97]; P < 0.001) and FIB-4 (0.88; CI95% [0.76-0.99]; P < 0.001), but similar to APRI (0.93; CI95% [0.87-0.99]; P < 0.001). For predicting cirrhosis, the AUROC of GPR (0.98; CI95% [0.95-1]; P < 0.001) was higher than that of APRI (0.95; CI95% [0.90-1]; P = 0.02), similar to RPR (0.99; CI95% [0.98-1]; P < 0.001) but lower than that of FIB-4 (1; CI95% [1-1]; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, APRI (OR = 3.78; P = 0.002) and FIB-4 (OR = 2.65; P = 0.01) were independent predictors of significant fibrosis. GPR was the only independent predictor of advanced fibrosis (OR = 4.64; P = 0.001) and FIB-4 was the independent predictor of cirrhosis (OR = 2.85; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: GPR does not demonstrate significant advantages over APRI, FIB-4, and RPR in identifying liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunisie Medicale
Tunisie Medicale Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Ethics and Practices of the Pharmacist. Evaluation of learning abilities after role-playing method: Comparing outcomes of Active and Observer. From Thesis to Publication: Unveiling the Predictive Factors for Cardiology Research at a North African Faculty of Medicine (Tunisia). Impact of therapeutic education on quality of life in coronary patients: Interventional study. Impacts of zinc enriched spirulina as an adjunct to conventional treatment of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Study protocol for a North African randomized controlled trial (SPIRICOPD).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1