剖宫产术后阴道分娩子宫开裂和破裂的风险因素。

Q3 Medicine Tunisie Medicale Pub Date : 2024-10-05 DOI:10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5015
Hana Hakim, Mohamed Derbel, Hajer Mtibaa, Basma Akrout, Khaled Trigui, Fatma Chaker, Fatma Khanfir, Kais Chaabane
{"title":"剖宫产术后阴道分娩子宫开裂和破裂的风险因素。","authors":"Hana Hakim, Mohamed Derbel, Hajer Mtibaa, Basma Akrout, Khaled Trigui, Fatma Chaker, Fatma Khanfir, Kais Chaabane","doi":"10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaginal delivery after caesarean section (VBAC) is recommended, but the rising rate of uterine rupture calls into question the safety of this practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, analytical and descriptive observational study, carried out in a tertiary care maternity. We included all parturients with one previous caesarean section undergoing trial of labor. We assessed the quality of the uterine scar which was evaluated after delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 300 patients with one previous caesarean section undergoing trial of labor. The trial of labor was successful (vaginal delivery) in 50.7% of cases. The uterine scar, assessed after delivery, was of good quality in 79% of cases. We noted 7 cases of uterine rupture, i.e. 2.3% of cases, and dehiscence in 56 patients, i.e. 18.6% of cases. Parity, conditions of previous caesarean section (programmed or emergency) and interpregnancy interval were significantly related to the labor outcome (p=0.004, p=0.001 and p=0.135 respectively). The occurrence of rupture or dehiscence was not significantly related to macrosomia, defined as a neonatal weight greater than 4000g (p=0.135).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowing the risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture would enable the obstetrician to properly assess the situation in order to make the correct decision and avoid neonatal and maternal complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture in case of vaginal birth after cesarean section.\",\"authors\":\"Hana Hakim, Mohamed Derbel, Hajer Mtibaa, Basma Akrout, Khaled Trigui, Fatma Chaker, Fatma Khanfir, Kais Chaabane\",\"doi\":\"10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaginal delivery after caesarean section (VBAC) is recommended, but the rising rate of uterine rupture calls into question the safety of this practice.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, analytical and descriptive observational study, carried out in a tertiary care maternity. We included all parturients with one previous caesarean section undergoing trial of labor. We assessed the quality of the uterine scar which was evaluated after delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 300 patients with one previous caesarean section undergoing trial of labor. The trial of labor was successful (vaginal delivery) in 50.7% of cases. The uterine scar, assessed after delivery, was of good quality in 79% of cases. We noted 7 cases of uterine rupture, i.e. 2.3% of cases, and dehiscence in 56 patients, i.e. 18.6% of cases. Parity, conditions of previous caesarean section (programmed or emergency) and interpregnancy interval were significantly related to the labor outcome (p=0.004, p=0.001 and p=0.135 respectively). The occurrence of rupture or dehiscence was not significantly related to macrosomia, defined as a neonatal weight greater than 4000g (p=0.135).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Knowing the risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture would enable the obstetrician to properly assess the situation in order to make the correct decision and avoid neonatal and maternal complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tunisie Medicale\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tunisie Medicale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i10.5015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:目的:确定子宫开裂和破裂的风险因素:这是一项前瞻性、分析性和描述性观察研究,在一家三级护理产科医院进行。我们纳入了所有曾进行过一次剖腹产手术并正在进行试产的产妇。我们对子宫疤痕的质量进行了评估,并在产后进行了评价:我们纳入了 300 名曾接受过一次剖腹产手术并进行试产的产妇。50.7%的病例试产成功(阴道分娩)。经产后评估,79%的病例子宫瘢痕质量良好。我们发现有 7 例子宫破裂(占 2.3%),56 例开裂(占 18.6%)。胎次、前次剖腹产的情况(计划或紧急)和孕间期与分娩结果有显著关系(分别为P=0.004、P=0.001和P=0.135)。子宫破裂或开裂的发生与巨大儿(新生儿体重超过4000克)无明显关系(P=0.135):了解子宫开裂和破裂的风险因素可使产科医生正确评估情况,从而做出正确的决定,避免新生儿和产妇并发症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture in case of vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Introduction: Vaginal delivery after caesarean section (VBAC) is recommended, but the rising rate of uterine rupture calls into question the safety of this practice.

Aim: To identify risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture.

Methods: This was a prospective, analytical and descriptive observational study, carried out in a tertiary care maternity. We included all parturients with one previous caesarean section undergoing trial of labor. We assessed the quality of the uterine scar which was evaluated after delivery.

Results: We included 300 patients with one previous caesarean section undergoing trial of labor. The trial of labor was successful (vaginal delivery) in 50.7% of cases. The uterine scar, assessed after delivery, was of good quality in 79% of cases. We noted 7 cases of uterine rupture, i.e. 2.3% of cases, and dehiscence in 56 patients, i.e. 18.6% of cases. Parity, conditions of previous caesarean section (programmed or emergency) and interpregnancy interval were significantly related to the labor outcome (p=0.004, p=0.001 and p=0.135 respectively). The occurrence of rupture or dehiscence was not significantly related to macrosomia, defined as a neonatal weight greater than 4000g (p=0.135).

Conclusion: Knowing the risk factors for uterine dehiscence and rupture would enable the obstetrician to properly assess the situation in order to make the correct decision and avoid neonatal and maternal complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tunisie Medicale
Tunisie Medicale Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
GAIA therapeutic farm: Prospective study on multidisciplinary care efficacy. Iatrogenic risk in elderly patients. Impact of virtual reality on the perception of procedural pain in paediatric oncology. Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intravenous Leiomyomatosis of the Uterus: An Intriguing Case Revealed through Anatomopathological Examination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1