大型公共系统中的综合护理改善了简单的肾结石管理。

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000721
Cecilia Wada, Aaron A Laviana, Tarah Woodle, Parth Patel, Steven E Lerman, Jeremy Blumberg, Jamal Nabhani, Benjamin Waterman, Jonathan Bergman
{"title":"大型公共系统中的综合护理改善了简单的肾结石管理。","authors":"Cecilia Wada, Aaron A Laviana, Tarah Woodle, Parth Patel, Steven E Lerman, Jeremy Blumberg, Jamal Nabhani, Benjamin Waterman, Jonathan Bergman","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services-the second largest public health care system in the United States-clinical integration allows specialists and primary care providers to collaboratively provide specialty care. We used time-driven activity-based costing to compare patient burden and cost of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and management with and without clinical integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed and observed teams of physicians and staff to understand workflow practices and personnel, space, material, and device requirements for stone care in the 2 models. We created process maps that outline the entire arc of care and used time-driven activity-based costing to calculate the all-inclusive costs of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and scheduling for surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cost of kidney stone treatment per stone episode in the integrated pathway was $499.04, compared with $699.81 in the traditional, nonintegrated pathway, a difference of 29%. The number of steps needed to arrive at operating room scheduling was 11 with integration and 14 without it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical integration resulted in more efficient and cost-effective care from patient, provider, and health system perspectives. Integrated care may improve access to specialty care and increase the value of care and reduce treatment burden on patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"35-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated Care in a Large Public System Improves Simple Kidney Stone Management.\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Wada, Aaron A Laviana, Tarah Woodle, Parth Patel, Steven E Lerman, Jeremy Blumberg, Jamal Nabhani, Benjamin Waterman, Jonathan Bergman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services-the second largest public health care system in the United States-clinical integration allows specialists and primary care providers to collaboratively provide specialty care. We used time-driven activity-based costing to compare patient burden and cost of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and management with and without clinical integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed and observed teams of physicians and staff to understand workflow practices and personnel, space, material, and device requirements for stone care in the 2 models. We created process maps that outline the entire arc of care and used time-driven activity-based costing to calculate the all-inclusive costs of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and scheduling for surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cost of kidney stone treatment per stone episode in the integrated pathway was $499.04, compared with $699.81 in the traditional, nonintegrated pathway, a difference of 29%. The number of steps needed to arrive at operating room scheduling was 11 with integration and 14 without it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical integration resulted in more efficient and cost-effective care from patient, provider, and health system perspectives. Integrated care may improve access to specialty care and increase the value of care and reduce treatment burden on patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"35-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在美国第二大公共医疗保健系统--洛杉矶县卫生服务部,临床整合使专科医生和初级医疗服务提供者能够合作提供专科医疗服务。我们采用基于时间驱动活动的成本计算方法,比较了有临床整合和没有临床整合的肾结石诊断、检查和管理的患者负担和成本:方法:我们采访并观察了医生和员工团队,以了解两种模式下结石治疗的工作流程实践以及对人员、空间、材料和设备的要求。我们绘制了流程图,勾勒出整个治疗过程,并使用时间驱动的活动成本法计算肾结石诊断、检查和手术治疗安排的总成本:结果:在综合路径中,每例肾结石病例的治疗总成本为 499.04 美元,而在传统非综合路径中为 699.81 美元,两者相差 29%。整合后,手术室排期所需的步骤为 11 个,而未整合时为 14 个:结论:从患者、医疗服务提供者和医疗系统的角度来看,临床整合带来了更高效、更具成本效益的医疗服务。整合护理可改善专科护理的可及性,提高护理价值,减轻患者的治疗负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrated Care in a Large Public System Improves Simple Kidney Stone Management.

Introduction: In the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services-the second largest public health care system in the United States-clinical integration allows specialists and primary care providers to collaboratively provide specialty care. We used time-driven activity-based costing to compare patient burden and cost of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and management with and without clinical integration.

Methods: We interviewed and observed teams of physicians and staff to understand workflow practices and personnel, space, material, and device requirements for stone care in the 2 models. We created process maps that outline the entire arc of care and used time-driven activity-based costing to calculate the all-inclusive costs of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and scheduling for surgical treatment.

Results: The total cost of kidney stone treatment per stone episode in the integrated pathway was $499.04, compared with $699.81 in the traditional, nonintegrated pathway, a difference of 29%. The number of steps needed to arrive at operating room scheduling was 11 with integration and 14 without it.

Conclusions: Clinical integration resulted in more efficient and cost-effective care from patient, provider, and health system perspectives. Integrated care may improve access to specialty care and increase the value of care and reduce treatment burden on patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
Evidence-Based Framework for Surgical Irrigation Fluid Stewardship and Endoscopic Case Prioritization During Fluid Shortages. Carl A. Olsson, MD: A True Legend and Friend. Editorial Commentary. Reply: Fertility Preservation for Iatrogenic Infertility: Patient Barriers and Opportunities for the Reproductive Medicine Workforce. Contemporary Trends of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Procedures in the AUA Quality Registry: Are We Moving the Needle Toward More Minimally Invasive Treatments?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1