Cecilia Wada, Aaron A Laviana, Tarah Woodle, Parth Patel, Steven E Lerman, Jeremy Blumberg, Jamal Nabhani, Benjamin Waterman, Jonathan Bergman
{"title":"大型公共系统中的综合护理改善了简单的肾结石管理。","authors":"Cecilia Wada, Aaron A Laviana, Tarah Woodle, Parth Patel, Steven E Lerman, Jeremy Blumberg, Jamal Nabhani, Benjamin Waterman, Jonathan Bergman","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services-the second largest public health care system in the United States-clinical integration allows specialists and primary care providers to collaboratively provide specialty care. We used time-driven activity-based costing to compare patient burden and cost of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and management with and without clinical integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed and observed teams of physicians and staff to understand workflow practices and personnel, space, material, and device requirements for stone care in the 2 models. We created process maps that outline the entire arc of care and used time-driven activity-based costing to calculate the all-inclusive costs of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and scheduling for surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cost of kidney stone treatment per stone episode in the integrated pathway was $499.04, compared with $699.81 in the traditional, nonintegrated pathway, a difference of 29%. The number of steps needed to arrive at operating room scheduling was 11 with integration and 14 without it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical integration resulted in more efficient and cost-effective care from patient, provider, and health system perspectives. Integrated care may improve access to specialty care and increase the value of care and reduce treatment burden on patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"35-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated Care in a Large Public System Improves Simple Kidney Stone Management.\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Wada, Aaron A Laviana, Tarah Woodle, Parth Patel, Steven E Lerman, Jeremy Blumberg, Jamal Nabhani, Benjamin Waterman, Jonathan Bergman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services-the second largest public health care system in the United States-clinical integration allows specialists and primary care providers to collaboratively provide specialty care. We used time-driven activity-based costing to compare patient burden and cost of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and management with and without clinical integration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed and observed teams of physicians and staff to understand workflow practices and personnel, space, material, and device requirements for stone care in the 2 models. We created process maps that outline the entire arc of care and used time-driven activity-based costing to calculate the all-inclusive costs of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and scheduling for surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total cost of kidney stone treatment per stone episode in the integrated pathway was $499.04, compared with $699.81 in the traditional, nonintegrated pathway, a difference of 29%. The number of steps needed to arrive at operating room scheduling was 11 with integration and 14 without it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical integration resulted in more efficient and cost-effective care from patient, provider, and health system perspectives. Integrated care may improve access to specialty care and increase the value of care and reduce treatment burden on patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"35-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrated Care in a Large Public System Improves Simple Kidney Stone Management.
Introduction: In the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services-the second largest public health care system in the United States-clinical integration allows specialists and primary care providers to collaboratively provide specialty care. We used time-driven activity-based costing to compare patient burden and cost of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and management with and without clinical integration.
Methods: We interviewed and observed teams of physicians and staff to understand workflow practices and personnel, space, material, and device requirements for stone care in the 2 models. We created process maps that outline the entire arc of care and used time-driven activity-based costing to calculate the all-inclusive costs of kidney stone diagnosis, workup, and scheduling for surgical treatment.
Results: The total cost of kidney stone treatment per stone episode in the integrated pathway was $499.04, compared with $699.81 in the traditional, nonintegrated pathway, a difference of 29%. The number of steps needed to arrive at operating room scheduling was 11 with integration and 14 without it.
Conclusions: Clinical integration resulted in more efficient and cost-effective care from patient, provider, and health system perspectives. Integrated care may improve access to specialty care and increase the value of care and reduce treatment burden on patients.