用于诊断儿童肺炎的床旁肺部超声波检查。

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Lung India Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-29 DOI:10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_574_23
Gayathri Vaitheeswaran, Lakshmi S Velmurugan, Raveendran Jayabalan, Sivasambo Kalpana
{"title":"用于诊断儿童肺炎的床旁肺部超声波检查。","authors":"Gayathri Vaitheeswaran, Lakshmi S Velmurugan, Raveendran Jayabalan, Sivasambo Kalpana","doi":"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_574_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung ultrasound is emerging as a rapid, simple and safe alternative for diagnosing pneumonia since it has a higher sensitivity than X-rays and lower radiation exposure than computerized tomography. This is a prospective observational study done at a tertiary care centre in Chennai to study the diagnostic utility of lung ultrasound in pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 1 month to 12 years who were admitted to the hospital with complaints of cough, fever and/or breathing difficulty and on examination had tachypnea and/or chest indrawing were included in the study. All children underwent chest X-rays which was a standard hospital protocol. At admission, an independent investigator who was blinded to the clinical and radiological features of the child performed lung ultrasound. In all children, the final diagnosis of pneumonia was made by another independent expert paediatrician on the basis of the clinical features and chest X-ray. The test characteristics of ultrasound and chest X-ray were compared against this gold standard of physician-diagnosed pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 252 children studied, 225 (89.3%) had pneumonia while the rest 27 (10.7%) had other diagnoses. Among the 225 children with pneumonia, 223 (99.1%) were detected by ultrasound while 157 (69.8%) were detected by chest X-ray. All the test characteristics such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound were higher than those of chest X-ray. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound to diagnose pneumonia were 99.11% and 81.48%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of X-ray for the same were 69.77% and 74.07%, respectively. Overall diagnostic accuracy for chest ultrasonography was 97.22% (94.36% to 98.88%), whereas for chest radiography, it was found to be 70.24% (64.18% to 75.81%).While both modalities were able to diagnose pneumonia significantly, ultrasound had better strength of association (Cramer's V value = 0.849) than X-ray to the final diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lung ultrasound can be employed as a point-of-care investigation to diagnose pneumonia in suspected cases and can even replace chest X-ray in such circumstances.</p>","PeriodicalId":47462,"journal":{"name":"Lung India","volume":"41 6","pages":"411-415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-care lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of childhood pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Gayathri Vaitheeswaran, Lakshmi S Velmurugan, Raveendran Jayabalan, Sivasambo Kalpana\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_574_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Lung ultrasound is emerging as a rapid, simple and safe alternative for diagnosing pneumonia since it has a higher sensitivity than X-rays and lower radiation exposure than computerized tomography. This is a prospective observational study done at a tertiary care centre in Chennai to study the diagnostic utility of lung ultrasound in pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 1 month to 12 years who were admitted to the hospital with complaints of cough, fever and/or breathing difficulty and on examination had tachypnea and/or chest indrawing were included in the study. All children underwent chest X-rays which was a standard hospital protocol. At admission, an independent investigator who was blinded to the clinical and radiological features of the child performed lung ultrasound. In all children, the final diagnosis of pneumonia was made by another independent expert paediatrician on the basis of the clinical features and chest X-ray. The test characteristics of ultrasound and chest X-ray were compared against this gold standard of physician-diagnosed pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 252 children studied, 225 (89.3%) had pneumonia while the rest 27 (10.7%) had other diagnoses. Among the 225 children with pneumonia, 223 (99.1%) were detected by ultrasound while 157 (69.8%) were detected by chest X-ray. All the test characteristics such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound were higher than those of chest X-ray. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound to diagnose pneumonia were 99.11% and 81.48%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of X-ray for the same were 69.77% and 74.07%, respectively. Overall diagnostic accuracy for chest ultrasonography was 97.22% (94.36% to 98.88%), whereas for chest radiography, it was found to be 70.24% (64.18% to 75.81%).While both modalities were able to diagnose pneumonia significantly, ultrasound had better strength of association (Cramer's V value = 0.849) than X-ray to the final diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lung ultrasound can be employed as a point-of-care investigation to diagnose pneumonia in suspected cases and can even replace chest X-ray in such circumstances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung India\",\"volume\":\"41 6\",\"pages\":\"411-415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_574_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_574_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:肺部超声波是诊断肺炎的一种快速、简单和安全的替代方法,因为它比 X 射线具有更高的灵敏度,比计算机断层扫描具有更低的辐射暴露。这是一项前瞻性观察研究,在钦奈的一家三级医疗中心进行,目的是研究肺部超声波对肺炎的诊断作用:研究对象包括因咳嗽、发烧和/或呼吸困难而入院的 1 个月至 12 岁儿童,这些儿童在检查时出现呼吸急促和/或胸闷。所有儿童均按照医院的标准程序进行了胸部 X 光检查。入院时,由一名对患儿临床和放射学特征保密的独立研究人员为患儿进行肺部超声波检查。所有患儿的肺炎最终诊断均由另一名独立的儿科专家根据临床特征和胸部 X 光片做出。将超声波和胸部 X 光的检测特征与医生诊断肺炎的金标准进行了比较:在研究的 252 名儿童中,225 名(89.3%)患肺炎,其余 27 名(10.7%)患其他诊断。在 225 名肺炎患儿中,223 人(99.1%)通过超声波检查出肺炎,157 人(69.8%)通过胸部 X 光检查出肺炎。超声波检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值等所有检查特征均高于胸部 X 光检查。超声波诊断肺炎的敏感性和特异性分别为 99.11% 和 81.48%,而 X 光诊断肺炎的敏感性和特异性分别为 69.77% 和 74.07%。胸部超声波检查的总体诊断准确率为 97.22%(94.36% 至 98.88%),而胸部放射线检查的准确率为 70.24%(64.18% 至 75.81%)。虽然两种检查方式都能显著诊断肺炎,但超声波检查与最终诊断的关联度(Cramer's V 值 = 0.849)优于 X 光检查:结论:肺部超声波可作为一种床旁检查手段,用于诊断疑似肺炎病例,在这种情况下甚至可以取代胸部 X 光检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Point-of-care lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of childhood pneumonia.

Introduction: Lung ultrasound is emerging as a rapid, simple and safe alternative for diagnosing pneumonia since it has a higher sensitivity than X-rays and lower radiation exposure than computerized tomography. This is a prospective observational study done at a tertiary care centre in Chennai to study the diagnostic utility of lung ultrasound in pneumonia.

Methods: Children aged 1 month to 12 years who were admitted to the hospital with complaints of cough, fever and/or breathing difficulty and on examination had tachypnea and/or chest indrawing were included in the study. All children underwent chest X-rays which was a standard hospital protocol. At admission, an independent investigator who was blinded to the clinical and radiological features of the child performed lung ultrasound. In all children, the final diagnosis of pneumonia was made by another independent expert paediatrician on the basis of the clinical features and chest X-ray. The test characteristics of ultrasound and chest X-ray were compared against this gold standard of physician-diagnosed pneumonia.

Results: Out of the 252 children studied, 225 (89.3%) had pneumonia while the rest 27 (10.7%) had other diagnoses. Among the 225 children with pneumonia, 223 (99.1%) were detected by ultrasound while 157 (69.8%) were detected by chest X-ray. All the test characteristics such as sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of ultrasound were higher than those of chest X-ray. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound to diagnose pneumonia were 99.11% and 81.48%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of X-ray for the same were 69.77% and 74.07%, respectively. Overall diagnostic accuracy for chest ultrasonography was 97.22% (94.36% to 98.88%), whereas for chest radiography, it was found to be 70.24% (64.18% to 75.81%).While both modalities were able to diagnose pneumonia significantly, ultrasound had better strength of association (Cramer's V value = 0.849) than X-ray to the final diagnosis.

Conclusion: Lung ultrasound can be employed as a point-of-care investigation to diagnose pneumonia in suspected cases and can even replace chest X-ray in such circumstances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lung India
Lung India RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
114
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
A case letter on management of recurrent melioidosis. A Survey of Rigid Bronchoscopy Practices in India. A young lady with multiple lung nodules. Artificial Intelligence: The new weapon to END TB. Beyond tradition: Exploring the potential of a novel drainage technique for indwelling pleural catheter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1