婴儿的单眼间隙立体视。

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106107
Michael Kavšek , Martin Heil
{"title":"婴儿的单眼间隙立体视。","authors":"Michael Kavšek ,&nbsp;Martin Heil","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In monocular gap stereopsis, one eye perceives a complete rectangular surface while the other eye perceives two small adjacent rectangular surfaces separated by a narrow vertical gap. Our visual system interprets the difference caused by the unmatched monocular images as a depth difference between two small rectangles. In a spontaneous visual preference study, it was asked whether participants aged 4 months responded to the depth effect generated by a monocular gap. Two experimental conditions were conducted. In one (large outer edge disparity condition), the monocular depth effect was twice as strong as in the other one (small outer edge disparity condition), according to the experimental research with adult participants conducted by Pianta and Gillam (2003, <em>Vision Research,</em> Vol. 43, pp. 1937–1950). In both conditions, it was tested whether the stimulus bearing monocular gap stereopsis was preferred over a comparison stimulus without depth. According to the results, the participants preferred looking at the stimulus with monocular stereopsis in the large outer edge disparity condition over doing so in the small outer edge disparity condition. Moreover, the difference between experimental conditions was significant; that is, the infants displayed a stronger spontaneous preference in the condition with the large outer edge disparity than in the condition with the small outer edge disparity. These findings provide evidence to suggest that infants aged 4 months are able to respond to monocular vertical gap information.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"249 ","pages":"Article 106107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monocular gap stereopsis in infants\",\"authors\":\"Michael Kavšek ,&nbsp;Martin Heil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In monocular gap stereopsis, one eye perceives a complete rectangular surface while the other eye perceives two small adjacent rectangular surfaces separated by a narrow vertical gap. Our visual system interprets the difference caused by the unmatched monocular images as a depth difference between two small rectangles. In a spontaneous visual preference study, it was asked whether participants aged 4 months responded to the depth effect generated by a monocular gap. Two experimental conditions were conducted. In one (large outer edge disparity condition), the monocular depth effect was twice as strong as in the other one (small outer edge disparity condition), according to the experimental research with adult participants conducted by Pianta and Gillam (2003, <em>Vision Research,</em> Vol. 43, pp. 1937–1950). In both conditions, it was tested whether the stimulus bearing monocular gap stereopsis was preferred over a comparison stimulus without depth. According to the results, the participants preferred looking at the stimulus with monocular stereopsis in the large outer edge disparity condition over doing so in the small outer edge disparity condition. Moreover, the difference between experimental conditions was significant; that is, the infants displayed a stronger spontaneous preference in the condition with the large outer edge disparity than in the condition with the small outer edge disparity. These findings provide evidence to suggest that infants aged 4 months are able to respond to monocular vertical gap information.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"volume\":\"249 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524002479\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524002479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在单眼间隙立体视中,一只眼睛看到的是一个完整的矩形表面,而另一只眼睛看到的是两个相邻的小矩形表面,两者之间有一个狭窄的垂直间隙。我们的视觉系统将不匹配的单眼图像造成的差异解释为两个小矩形之间的深度差异。在一项自发视觉偏好研究中,我们询问了 4 个月大的参与者是否会对单眼间隙产生的深度效应做出反应。研究采用了两种实验条件。根据 Pianta 和 Gillam 对成人参与者进行的实验研究(2003 年,《视觉研究》,第 43 卷,第 1937-1950 页),在其中一个实验条件(大外缘差距条件)下,单眼深度效应是另一个实验条件(小外缘差距条件)下的两倍。在这两种条件下,都测试了带有单眼间隙立体感的刺激物是否比没有深度的对比刺激物更受青睐。结果表明,在大外缘差距条件下,被试更喜欢看带有单眼立体视的刺激物,而在小外缘差距条件下则不然。此外,实验条件之间的差异也很显著;也就是说,在外缘差距大的条件下,婴儿比在外缘差距小的条件下表现出更强的自发偏好。这些发现提供了证据,表明 4 个月大的婴儿能够对单眼垂直差距信息做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monocular gap stereopsis in infants
In monocular gap stereopsis, one eye perceives a complete rectangular surface while the other eye perceives two small adjacent rectangular surfaces separated by a narrow vertical gap. Our visual system interprets the difference caused by the unmatched monocular images as a depth difference between two small rectangles. In a spontaneous visual preference study, it was asked whether participants aged 4 months responded to the depth effect generated by a monocular gap. Two experimental conditions were conducted. In one (large outer edge disparity condition), the monocular depth effect was twice as strong as in the other one (small outer edge disparity condition), according to the experimental research with adult participants conducted by Pianta and Gillam (2003, Vision Research, Vol. 43, pp. 1937–1950). In both conditions, it was tested whether the stimulus bearing monocular gap stereopsis was preferred over a comparison stimulus without depth. According to the results, the participants preferred looking at the stimulus with monocular stereopsis in the large outer edge disparity condition over doing so in the small outer edge disparity condition. Moreover, the difference between experimental conditions was significant; that is, the infants displayed a stronger spontaneous preference in the condition with the large outer edge disparity than in the condition with the small outer edge disparity. These findings provide evidence to suggest that infants aged 4 months are able to respond to monocular vertical gap information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
A happy face advantage for pareidolic faces in children and adults Children plan manual actions similarly in structured tasks and in free play Editorial Board Concurrent and predictive associations between executive function and numerical skills in early childhood Examining methodological influences on the rhythmic priming effect: A commentary on Kim, McLaren, and Lee (2024)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1