评估深度学习辅助对输卵管浆液性输卵管上皮内癌(STIC)组织病理学诊断的影响。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1002/2056-4538.70006
Joep MA Bogaerts, Miranda P Steenbeek, John-Melle Bokhorst, Majke HD van Bommel, Luca Abete, Francesca Addante, Mariel Brinkhuis, Alicja Chrzan, Fleur Cordier, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran, Juan Fernández-Pérez, Anna Fischer, C Blake Gilks, Angela Guerriero, Marta Jaconi, Tony G Kleijn, Loes Kooreman, Spencer Martin, Jakob Milla, Nadine Narducci, Chara Ntala, Vinita Parkash, Christophe de Pauw, Joseph T Rabban, Lucia Rijstenberg, Robert Rottscholl, Annette Staebler, Koen Van de Vijver, Gian Franco Zannoni, Monica van Zanten, AI-STIC Study Group, Joanne A de Hullu, Michiel Simons, Jeroen AWM van der Laak
{"title":"评估深度学习辅助对输卵管浆液性输卵管上皮内癌(STIC)组织病理学诊断的影响。","authors":"Joep MA Bogaerts,&nbsp;Miranda P Steenbeek,&nbsp;John-Melle Bokhorst,&nbsp;Majke HD van Bommel,&nbsp;Luca Abete,&nbsp;Francesca Addante,&nbsp;Mariel Brinkhuis,&nbsp;Alicja Chrzan,&nbsp;Fleur Cordier,&nbsp;Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran,&nbsp;Juan Fernández-Pérez,&nbsp;Anna Fischer,&nbsp;C Blake Gilks,&nbsp;Angela Guerriero,&nbsp;Marta Jaconi,&nbsp;Tony G Kleijn,&nbsp;Loes Kooreman,&nbsp;Spencer Martin,&nbsp;Jakob Milla,&nbsp;Nadine Narducci,&nbsp;Chara Ntala,&nbsp;Vinita Parkash,&nbsp;Christophe de Pauw,&nbsp;Joseph T Rabban,&nbsp;Lucia Rijstenberg,&nbsp;Robert Rottscholl,&nbsp;Annette Staebler,&nbsp;Koen Van de Vijver,&nbsp;Gian Franco Zannoni,&nbsp;Monica van Zanten,&nbsp;AI-STIC Study Group,&nbsp;Joanne A de Hullu,&nbsp;Michiel Simons,&nbsp;Jeroen AWM van der Laak","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, it has become clear that artificial intelligence (AI) models can achieve high accuracy in specific pathology-related tasks. An example is our deep-learning model, designed to automatically detect serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), the precursor lesion to high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, found in the fallopian tube. However, the standalone performance of a model is insufficient to determine its value in the diagnostic setting. To evaluate the impact of the use of this model on pathologists' performance, we set up a fully crossed multireader, multicase study, in which 26 participants, from 11 countries, reviewed 100 digitalized H&amp;E-stained slides of fallopian tubes (30 cases/70 controls) with and without AI assistance, with a washout period between the sessions. We evaluated the effect of the deep-learning model on accuracy, slide review time and (subjectively perceived) diagnostic certainty, using mixed-models analysis. With AI assistance, we found a significant increase in accuracy (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) whereby the average sensitivity increased from 82% to 93%. Further, there was a significant 44 s (32%) reduction in slide review time (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The level of certainty that the participants felt versus their own assessment also significantly increased, by 0.24 on a 10-point scale (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). In conclusion, we found that, in a diverse group of pathologists and pathology residents, AI support resulted in a significant improvement in the accuracy of STIC diagnosis and was coupled with a substantial reduction in slide review time. This model has the potential to provide meaningful support to pathologists in the diagnosis of STIC, ultimately streamlining and optimizing the overall diagnostic process.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of deep-learning assistance on the histopathological diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) in fallopian tubes\",\"authors\":\"Joep MA Bogaerts,&nbsp;Miranda P Steenbeek,&nbsp;John-Melle Bokhorst,&nbsp;Majke HD van Bommel,&nbsp;Luca Abete,&nbsp;Francesca Addante,&nbsp;Mariel Brinkhuis,&nbsp;Alicja Chrzan,&nbsp;Fleur Cordier,&nbsp;Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran,&nbsp;Juan Fernández-Pérez,&nbsp;Anna Fischer,&nbsp;C Blake Gilks,&nbsp;Angela Guerriero,&nbsp;Marta Jaconi,&nbsp;Tony G Kleijn,&nbsp;Loes Kooreman,&nbsp;Spencer Martin,&nbsp;Jakob Milla,&nbsp;Nadine Narducci,&nbsp;Chara Ntala,&nbsp;Vinita Parkash,&nbsp;Christophe de Pauw,&nbsp;Joseph T Rabban,&nbsp;Lucia Rijstenberg,&nbsp;Robert Rottscholl,&nbsp;Annette Staebler,&nbsp;Koen Van de Vijver,&nbsp;Gian Franco Zannoni,&nbsp;Monica van Zanten,&nbsp;AI-STIC Study Group,&nbsp;Joanne A de Hullu,&nbsp;Michiel Simons,&nbsp;Jeroen AWM van der Laak\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/2056-4538.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent years, it has become clear that artificial intelligence (AI) models can achieve high accuracy in specific pathology-related tasks. An example is our deep-learning model, designed to automatically detect serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), the precursor lesion to high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, found in the fallopian tube. However, the standalone performance of a model is insufficient to determine its value in the diagnostic setting. To evaluate the impact of the use of this model on pathologists' performance, we set up a fully crossed multireader, multicase study, in which 26 participants, from 11 countries, reviewed 100 digitalized H&amp;E-stained slides of fallopian tubes (30 cases/70 controls) with and without AI assistance, with a washout period between the sessions. We evaluated the effect of the deep-learning model on accuracy, slide review time and (subjectively perceived) diagnostic certainty, using mixed-models analysis. With AI assistance, we found a significant increase in accuracy (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) whereby the average sensitivity increased from 82% to 93%. Further, there was a significant 44 s (32%) reduction in slide review time (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). The level of certainty that the participants felt versus their own assessment also significantly increased, by 0.24 on a 10-point scale (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). In conclusion, we found that, in a diverse group of pathologists and pathology residents, AI support resulted in a significant improvement in the accuracy of STIC diagnosis and was coupled with a substantial reduction in slide review time. This model has the potential to provide meaningful support to pathologists in the diagnosis of STIC, ultimately streamlining and optimizing the overall diagnostic process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11496567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.70006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.70006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人工智能(AI)模型显然可以在特定病理学相关任务中达到很高的准确性。例如,我们的深度学习模型旨在自动检测浆液性输卵管上皮内癌(STIC),这是输卵管中发现的高级别浆液性卵巢癌的前驱病变。然而,模型的独立性能不足以确定其在诊断中的价值。为了评估该模型的使用对病理学家工作表现的影响,我们建立了一个完全交叉的多阅读器、多病例研究,来自 11 个国家的 26 名参与者在有人工智能辅助和无人工智能辅助的情况下审查了 100 张数字化 H&E 染色的输卵管切片(30 例/70 例对照),两次审查之间有一个冲洗期。我们采用混合模型分析法评估了深度学习模型对准确性、幻灯片审查时间和(主观认为的)诊断确定性的影响。我们发现,在人工智能辅助下,准确率显著提高(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the impact of deep-learning assistance on the histopathological diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) in fallopian tubes

In recent years, it has become clear that artificial intelligence (AI) models can achieve high accuracy in specific pathology-related tasks. An example is our deep-learning model, designed to automatically detect serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), the precursor lesion to high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, found in the fallopian tube. However, the standalone performance of a model is insufficient to determine its value in the diagnostic setting. To evaluate the impact of the use of this model on pathologists' performance, we set up a fully crossed multireader, multicase study, in which 26 participants, from 11 countries, reviewed 100 digitalized H&E-stained slides of fallopian tubes (30 cases/70 controls) with and without AI assistance, with a washout period between the sessions. We evaluated the effect of the deep-learning model on accuracy, slide review time and (subjectively perceived) diagnostic certainty, using mixed-models analysis. With AI assistance, we found a significant increase in accuracy (p < 0.01) whereby the average sensitivity increased from 82% to 93%. Further, there was a significant 44 s (32%) reduction in slide review time (p < 0.01). The level of certainty that the participants felt versus their own assessment also significantly increased, by 0.24 on a 10-point scale (p < 0.01). In conclusion, we found that, in a diverse group of pathologists and pathology residents, AI support resulted in a significant improvement in the accuracy of STIC diagnosis and was coupled with a substantial reduction in slide review time. This model has the potential to provide meaningful support to pathologists in the diagnosis of STIC, ultimately streamlining and optimizing the overall diagnostic process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
期刊最新文献
Large language models as a diagnostic support tool in neuropathology. Homologous recombination deficiency score is an independent prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Breast cancer survival prediction using an automated mitosis detection pipeline Assessing the impact of deep-learning assistance on the histopathological diagnosis of serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) in fallopian tubes A clinically feasible algorithm for the parallel detection of glioma-associated copy number variation markers based on shallow whole genome sequencing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1