首次怀孕流产或自然流产:心理健康服务使用情况队列研究。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 LAW Issues in Law & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.70257/LZXP7816
James Studnicki, Tessa Longbons Cox, John W Fisher, Christina A Cirucci, David C Reardon, Ingrid Skop, Christopher Craver, Maka Tsulukidze, Zbigniew Ras
{"title":"首次怀孕流产或自然流产:心理健康服务使用情况队列研究。","authors":"James Studnicki, Tessa Longbons Cox, John W Fisher, Christina A Cirucci, David C Reardon, Ingrid Skop, Christopher Craver, Maka Tsulukidze, Zbigniew Ras","doi":"10.70257/LZXP7816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While both induced abortion and natural pregnancy loss have been associated with subsequent mental health problems, population-based studies directly comparing these two pregnancy outcomes are rare. We sought to compare mental health morbidity after an induced abortion or natural loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Continuously eligible Medicaid beneficiaries age 16 in 1999 were assigned to two cohorts based upon the first pregnancy outcome: abortion (n = 1,331) or natural loss (n = 605). Outcomes were mental health outpatient visits, inpatient hospital admissions and hospital days of stay per patient per year. Average exposure periods before and after the first pregnancy outcome for each cohort were used to adjust the mental health service rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to the first pregnancy outcome, all three utilization rates were significantly higher for the natural loss cohort compared to the abortion cohort. For the abortion cohort, the per-patient per-year increase from the pre- to post-pregnancy periods was significant for all three rates: 2.04 times for outpatient visits (p < 0.0001), 3.04 times for inpatient admissions (p = 0.0003), and 3.01 times for hospital days of stay (p = 0.0112). None of the pre-to-post rate increases were significant for the natural loss cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher pre-pregnancy use rates for women who experience a natural pregnancy loss indicate that increased mental health services use following abortion cannot be solely attributed to pre-existing mental illness. Only the abortion cohort, but not the natural loss cohort, experienced significant increases in mental health services use following the first pregnancy outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":48665,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Law & Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Pregnancy Abortion or Natural Pregnancy Loss: A Cohort Study of Mental Health Services Utilization.\",\"authors\":\"James Studnicki, Tessa Longbons Cox, John W Fisher, Christina A Cirucci, David C Reardon, Ingrid Skop, Christopher Craver, Maka Tsulukidze, Zbigniew Ras\",\"doi\":\"10.70257/LZXP7816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While both induced abortion and natural pregnancy loss have been associated with subsequent mental health problems, population-based studies directly comparing these two pregnancy outcomes are rare. We sought to compare mental health morbidity after an induced abortion or natural loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Continuously eligible Medicaid beneficiaries age 16 in 1999 were assigned to two cohorts based upon the first pregnancy outcome: abortion (n = 1,331) or natural loss (n = 605). Outcomes were mental health outpatient visits, inpatient hospital admissions and hospital days of stay per patient per year. Average exposure periods before and after the first pregnancy outcome for each cohort were used to adjust the mental health service rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to the first pregnancy outcome, all three utilization rates were significantly higher for the natural loss cohort compared to the abortion cohort. For the abortion cohort, the per-patient per-year increase from the pre- to post-pregnancy periods was significant for all three rates: 2.04 times for outpatient visits (p < 0.0001), 3.04 times for inpatient admissions (p = 0.0003), and 3.01 times for hospital days of stay (p = 0.0112). None of the pre-to-post rate increases were significant for the natural loss cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher pre-pregnancy use rates for women who experience a natural pregnancy loss indicate that increased mental health services use following abortion cannot be solely attributed to pre-existing mental illness. Only the abortion cohort, but not the natural loss cohort, experienced significant increases in mental health services use following the first pregnancy outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Law & Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Law & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70257/LZXP7816\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70257/LZXP7816","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:虽然人工流产和自然流产都与随后的心理健康问题有关,但直接比较这两种妊娠结果的人群研究却很少见。我们试图比较人工流产或自然流产后的心理健康发病率:方法:根据首次妊娠结果,将 1999 年年满 16 周岁且连续符合条件的医疗补助受益人分为两个组群:人工流产(n = 1,331 人)或自然流产(n = 605 人)。结果为精神健康门诊就诊人次、住院人次和每位患者每年的住院天数。每个队列在首次妊娠前后的平均暴露期被用来调整精神健康服务率:结果:在首次妊娠结果出现之前,自然流产队列的三项使用率均明显高于人工流产队列。就人工流产队列而言,从怀孕前到怀孕后,每名患者每年的使用率均有显著增加:门诊就诊率为 2.04 倍(p < 0.0001),住院就诊率为 3.04 倍(p = 0.0003),住院天数为 3.01 倍(p = 0.0112)。自然损失队列中,孕前与孕后的比率增长均不显著:结论:自然流产妇女孕前使用精神健康服务的比例较高,这表明流产后精神健康服务使用率的增加不能完全归因于流产前已存在的精神疾病。只有人工流产队列(而非自然流产队列)在首次妊娠结果出来后心理健康服务的使用率出现了显著增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
First Pregnancy Abortion or Natural Pregnancy Loss: A Cohort Study of Mental Health Services Utilization.

Introduction: While both induced abortion and natural pregnancy loss have been associated with subsequent mental health problems, population-based studies directly comparing these two pregnancy outcomes are rare. We sought to compare mental health morbidity after an induced abortion or natural loss.

Methods: Continuously eligible Medicaid beneficiaries age 16 in 1999 were assigned to two cohorts based upon the first pregnancy outcome: abortion (n = 1,331) or natural loss (n = 605). Outcomes were mental health outpatient visits, inpatient hospital admissions and hospital days of stay per patient per year. Average exposure periods before and after the first pregnancy outcome for each cohort were used to adjust the mental health service rates.

Results: Prior to the first pregnancy outcome, all three utilization rates were significantly higher for the natural loss cohort compared to the abortion cohort. For the abortion cohort, the per-patient per-year increase from the pre- to post-pregnancy periods was significant for all three rates: 2.04 times for outpatient visits (p < 0.0001), 3.04 times for inpatient admissions (p = 0.0003), and 3.01 times for hospital days of stay (p = 0.0112). None of the pre-to-post rate increases were significant for the natural loss cohort.

Conclusion: Higher pre-pregnancy use rates for women who experience a natural pregnancy loss indicate that increased mental health services use following abortion cannot be solely attributed to pre-existing mental illness. Only the abortion cohort, but not the natural loss cohort, experienced significant increases in mental health services use following the first pregnancy outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Issues in Law & Medicine
Issues in Law & Medicine Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Issues in Law & Medicine is a peer reviewed professional journal published semiannually. Founded in 1985, ILM is co-sponsored by the National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent & Disabled, Inc. and the Watson Bowes Research Institute. Issues is devoted to providing technical and informational assistance to attorneys, health care professionals, educators and administrators on legal, medical, and ethical issues arising from health care decisions. Its subscribers include law libraries, medical libraries, university libraries, court libraries, attorneys, physicians, university professors and other scholars, primarily in the U.S. and Canada, but also in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Italy, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.
期刊最新文献
A Reanalysis of Mental Disorders Risk Following First-Trimester Abortions in Denmark. In Vitro Fertilization, State Wrongful Death Statutes and State Fetal Homicide Statutes: The Reaction to LePage v. Center for Reproductive Medicine. International Standards and Features of Financing in the Field of Health Care and Provision of Medical Services. Misleading Statements About "Life of the Mother" Exceptions in Pro-life Laws Require Correction. State Regulation of Ensuring the Quality Medical Care During Martial Law in Ukraine: Lessons for the International Community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1