出院清单对指导性医疗治疗和心力衰竭中期预后的影响。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Korean Journal of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-24 DOI:10.3904/kjim.2024.088
Won-Seok Lee, Kyu-Sun Lee, Helsi Rismiati, Hae-Young Lee
{"title":"出院清单对指导性医疗治疗和心力衰竭中期预后的影响。","authors":"Won-Seok Lee, Kyu-Sun Lee, Helsi Rismiati, Hae-Young Lee","doi":"10.3904/kjim.2024.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Despite the proven benefit of the guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), it remains underutilized in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of the discharge checklist on GDMT installation and the prognosis of HF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a single-center, observational study that included all patients admitted for HF from March 2021 to February 2023. The data were retrieved from electronic medical records and discharge checklists. A comparison was conducted between the checklist group and the non-checklist group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or readmission for HF within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The checklist was completed for 537 patients (checklist group) and not for 187 patients (non-checklist group). The proportion of patients to whom two or more components of GDMT were prescribed was significantly higher in the checklist group than in the non-checklist group (59.6% vs 42.2%, p < 0.001). The checklist group exhibited a significantly lower primary outcome compared to the non-checklist group (27.4% vs. 36.4%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98, p = 0.036). The effect of the checklist was more prominent in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77, p = 0.001) than in HF with mildly-reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.42, p = 0.676) (p for interaction = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of the discharge checklist was associated with an improvement in GDMT prescription and an improved prognosis in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48785,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"945-956"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569919/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of discharge checklist on guideline-directed medical therapy and mid-term prognosis in heart failure.\",\"authors\":\"Won-Seok Lee, Kyu-Sun Lee, Helsi Rismiati, Hae-Young Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3904/kjim.2024.088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Despite the proven benefit of the guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), it remains underutilized in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of the discharge checklist on GDMT installation and the prognosis of HF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a single-center, observational study that included all patients admitted for HF from March 2021 to February 2023. The data were retrieved from electronic medical records and discharge checklists. A comparison was conducted between the checklist group and the non-checklist group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or readmission for HF within 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The checklist was completed for 537 patients (checklist group) and not for 187 patients (non-checklist group). The proportion of patients to whom two or more components of GDMT were prescribed was significantly higher in the checklist group than in the non-checklist group (59.6% vs 42.2%, p < 0.001). The checklist group exhibited a significantly lower primary outcome compared to the non-checklist group (27.4% vs. 36.4%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98, p = 0.036). The effect of the checklist was more prominent in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77, p = 0.001) than in HF with mildly-reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.42, p = 0.676) (p for interaction = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of the discharge checklist was associated with an improvement in GDMT prescription and an improved prognosis in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"945-956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569919/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2024.088\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2024.088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:尽管指南指导下的药物治疗(GDMT)已被证实具有益处,但在急性心力衰竭(HF)住院患者中仍未得到充分利用。我们的目的是评估出院检查清单对 GDMT 安装和心衰患者预后的影响:本研究是一项单中心观察性研究,纳入了 2021 年 3 月至 2023 年 2 月期间因高血压入院的所有患者。数据来自电子病历和出院检查单。在核对表组和非核对表组之间进行了比较。主要终点是全因死亡率或6个月内因高血压再次入院的综合结果:537名患者(核对表组)完成了核对表,187名患者(非核对表组)未完成核对表。核对表组中开具两种或两种以上 GDMT 成分处方的患者比例明显高于非核对表组(59.6% vs 42.2%,P < 0.001)。核对表组的主要结果明显低于非核对表组(27.4% vs. 36.4%,HR 0.73,95% CI 0.55-0.98,p = 0.036)。核对表对射血分数减低的心房颤动患者的影响(HR 0.51,95% CI 0.34-0.77,p = 0.001)比对射血分数轻度减低和保留的心房颤动患者的影响(HR 0.91,95% CI 0.58-1.42,p = 0.676)更为显著(交互作用的p = 0.06):出院清单的实施与射血分数减低的心房颤动患者GDMT处方的改善和预后的改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of discharge checklist on guideline-directed medical therapy and mid-term prognosis in heart failure.

Background/aims: Despite the proven benefit of the guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), it remains underutilized in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate the impact of the discharge checklist on GDMT installation and the prognosis of HF patients.

Methods: This study was a single-center, observational study that included all patients admitted for HF from March 2021 to February 2023. The data were retrieved from electronic medical records and discharge checklists. A comparison was conducted between the checklist group and the non-checklist group. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or readmission for HF within 6 months.

Results: The checklist was completed for 537 patients (checklist group) and not for 187 patients (non-checklist group). The proportion of patients to whom two or more components of GDMT were prescribed was significantly higher in the checklist group than in the non-checklist group (59.6% vs 42.2%, p < 0.001). The checklist group exhibited a significantly lower primary outcome compared to the non-checklist group (27.4% vs. 36.4%, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98, p = 0.036). The effect of the checklist was more prominent in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77, p = 0.001) than in HF with mildly-reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.42, p = 0.676) (p for interaction = 0.06).

Conclusion: The implementation of the discharge checklist was associated with an improvement in GDMT prescription and an improved prognosis in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
Korean Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
129
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine is an international medical journal published in English by the Korean Association of Internal Medicine. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, reviews, and editorials on all aspects of medicine, including clinical investigations and basic research. Both human and experimental animal studies are welcome, as are new findings on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases. Case reports will be published only in exceptional circumstances, when they illustrate a rare occurrence of clinical importance. Letters to the editor are encouraged for specific comments on published articles and general viewpoints.
期刊最新文献
A link between systemic low-grade inflammation and frailty in older adults: clinical evidence from a nationwide population-based study. Systemic venous air embolism after percutaneous lung biopsy. Adverse drug reactions following treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: a linked national tuberculosis surveillance with claims database. Association between oral health and hyperuricemia in Korean adults: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2016-2019. Effective control of a severely progressive recurrent respiratory papillomatosis with repetitive cryotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1