{"title":"潜伏期相关 RNA/Latency-Associated Transcript 的发现和特征描述的雷区之旅。","authors":"Homayon Ghiasi","doi":"10.3390/v16101562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific knowledge evolves in small steps, with occasional backsteps to correct inaccuracies, all occurring within a competitive environment. This perspective for the first time looks at the history of latency-related RNA (LR-RNA) that was later renamed latency-associated transcript (LAT). At the 1986 International Herpesvirus Workshop (IHW) meeting in Leeds, England, Daniel L Rock and Anthony B Nesburn first reported the discovery of human herpes virus 1 (HSV-1) latency-related (LR) RNA that is antisense to ICP0. Less than a month after the IHW meeting, a paper was submitted to <i>Science</i> magazine and 8 months later appeared in print thanking \"D. Rock for suggesting RNA complementary to the ICP0 message may be present in latently infected cells\". This perspective is not a review of the LAT literature but intends to clarify the timeline of LAT discovery and subsequent breakthroughs such as reactivation, apoptosis, CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell exhaustion, and LAT expression in different cell types detected during latency. While many review articles have been written about LAT since 1987, the most comprehensive and balanced review about LAT was written by Dr. David Bloom's group. In this overview, I will discuss our original collaboration with Dr. Dan Rock and subsequent work that our group performed, which is still ongoing. Finally, I will discuss the controversies associated with LAT from its inception to current times.</p>","PeriodicalId":49328,"journal":{"name":"Viruses-Basel","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Journey through the Minefield of the Discovery and Characterization of Latency-Related RNA/Latency-Associated Transcript.\",\"authors\":\"Homayon Ghiasi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/v16101562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Scientific knowledge evolves in small steps, with occasional backsteps to correct inaccuracies, all occurring within a competitive environment. This perspective for the first time looks at the history of latency-related RNA (LR-RNA) that was later renamed latency-associated transcript (LAT). At the 1986 International Herpesvirus Workshop (IHW) meeting in Leeds, England, Daniel L Rock and Anthony B Nesburn first reported the discovery of human herpes virus 1 (HSV-1) latency-related (LR) RNA that is antisense to ICP0. Less than a month after the IHW meeting, a paper was submitted to <i>Science</i> magazine and 8 months later appeared in print thanking \\\"D. Rock for suggesting RNA complementary to the ICP0 message may be present in latently infected cells\\\". This perspective is not a review of the LAT literature but intends to clarify the timeline of LAT discovery and subsequent breakthroughs such as reactivation, apoptosis, CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell exhaustion, and LAT expression in different cell types detected during latency. While many review articles have been written about LAT since 1987, the most comprehensive and balanced review about LAT was written by Dr. David Bloom's group. In this overview, I will discuss our original collaboration with Dr. Dan Rock and subsequent work that our group performed, which is still ongoing. Finally, I will discuss the controversies associated with LAT from its inception to current times.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16101562\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16101562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
科学知识的发展是一小步一小步的,偶尔也会走回头路纠正错误,所有这些都发生在竞争激烈的环境中。本视角首次回顾了潜伏期相关 RNA(LR-RNA)的历史,它后来被重新命名为潜伏期相关转录本(LAT)。1986 年在英国利兹举行的国际疱疹病毒研讨会(IHW)上,丹尼尔-洛克(Daniel L Rock)和安东尼-内斯本(Anthony B Nesburn)首次报告了人类疱疹病毒 1(HSV-1)潜伏期相关 RNA 的发现,这种 RNA 与 ICP0 是反义的。在 IHW 会议结束后不到一个月,一篇论文就被提交给了《科学》杂志,8 个月后,这篇论文被刊登出来,感谢 "D. Rock 提出与 ICP0 信息互补的 RNA 可能存在于潜伏感染的细胞中"。本视角并不是对 LAT 文献的回顾,而是要阐明 LAT 发现的时间线以及随后的突破,如重新激活、细胞凋亡、CD8+ T 细胞衰竭以及潜伏期在不同细胞类型中检测到的 LAT 表达。自 1987 年以来,有关 LAT 的综述文章层出不穷,但关于 LAT 的最全面、最平衡的综述是由 David Bloom 博士的研究小组撰写的。在这篇综述中,我将讨论我们与丹-洛克博士最初的合作以及我们小组随后开展的工作,这些工作仍在进行中。最后,我将讨论与 LAT 相关的争议,这些争议从 LAT 诞生到现在一直存在。
A Journey through the Minefield of the Discovery and Characterization of Latency-Related RNA/Latency-Associated Transcript.
Scientific knowledge evolves in small steps, with occasional backsteps to correct inaccuracies, all occurring within a competitive environment. This perspective for the first time looks at the history of latency-related RNA (LR-RNA) that was later renamed latency-associated transcript (LAT). At the 1986 International Herpesvirus Workshop (IHW) meeting in Leeds, England, Daniel L Rock and Anthony B Nesburn first reported the discovery of human herpes virus 1 (HSV-1) latency-related (LR) RNA that is antisense to ICP0. Less than a month after the IHW meeting, a paper was submitted to Science magazine and 8 months later appeared in print thanking "D. Rock for suggesting RNA complementary to the ICP0 message may be present in latently infected cells". This perspective is not a review of the LAT literature but intends to clarify the timeline of LAT discovery and subsequent breakthroughs such as reactivation, apoptosis, CD8+ T cell exhaustion, and LAT expression in different cell types detected during latency. While many review articles have been written about LAT since 1987, the most comprehensive and balanced review about LAT was written by Dr. David Bloom's group. In this overview, I will discuss our original collaboration with Dr. Dan Rock and subsequent work that our group performed, which is still ongoing. Finally, I will discuss the controversies associated with LAT from its inception to current times.
期刊介绍:
Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies of viruses. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, conference reports and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. We also encourage the publication of timely reviews and commentaries on topics of interest to the virology community and feature highlights from the virology literature in the ''News and Views'' section. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.