Christine Fehlner-Gardiner, Gyanendra Gongal, Tenzin Tenzin, Claude Sabeta, Paola De Benedictis, Silene Manrique Rocha, Alexander Vargas, Natalia Cediel-Becerra, Luis Carlos Gomez, Joanne Maki, Charles E Rupprecht
{"title":"猫狂犬病--一个新出现的公共卫生问题。","authors":"Christine Fehlner-Gardiner, Gyanendra Gongal, Tenzin Tenzin, Claude Sabeta, Paola De Benedictis, Silene Manrique Rocha, Alexander Vargas, Natalia Cediel-Becerra, Luis Carlos Gomez, Joanne Maki, Charles E Rupprecht","doi":"10.3390/v16101635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human rabies cases today are predominantly associated with infection from rabid domestic dogs. Unlike dogs, a common global reservoir species that perpetuates rabies viruses (RABV) within their populations, domestic cats are much less frequently reported or vaccinated. Epidemiologically, cats are important vectors of lyssaviruses but are not viral reservoirs. Typically, cats are incidental hosts only, infected with the predominant lyssavirus in their geographic locale. Human cases associated with rabid cats have occurred in Africa, Asia, Europe and throughout the Americas. As adept, solitary hunters, wild and domestic felids are at risk of lyssavirus infection based upon interactions with infected prey, such as bats, or from transmission by other mesocarnivores, such as rabid dogs, foxes, jackals, raccoons, and skunks. Current veterinary vaccines provide safe and effective immunity in cats against phylogroup I lyssaviruses, such as RABV, but not against divergent lyssaviruses in phylogroups II-IV. With the focus upon the global elimination of canine rabies, the emergence of rabies in cats represents a concerning trend. Clearly, education about the occurrence of rabies in cats needs to be improved, as well as the routine vaccination of cats to reduce the associated risks to public health, agriculture, and conservation biology from a One Health perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":49328,"journal":{"name":"Viruses-Basel","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rabies in Cats-An Emerging Public Health Issue.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Fehlner-Gardiner, Gyanendra Gongal, Tenzin Tenzin, Claude Sabeta, Paola De Benedictis, Silene Manrique Rocha, Alexander Vargas, Natalia Cediel-Becerra, Luis Carlos Gomez, Joanne Maki, Charles E Rupprecht\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/v16101635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human rabies cases today are predominantly associated with infection from rabid domestic dogs. Unlike dogs, a common global reservoir species that perpetuates rabies viruses (RABV) within their populations, domestic cats are much less frequently reported or vaccinated. Epidemiologically, cats are important vectors of lyssaviruses but are not viral reservoirs. Typically, cats are incidental hosts only, infected with the predominant lyssavirus in their geographic locale. Human cases associated with rabid cats have occurred in Africa, Asia, Europe and throughout the Americas. As adept, solitary hunters, wild and domestic felids are at risk of lyssavirus infection based upon interactions with infected prey, such as bats, or from transmission by other mesocarnivores, such as rabid dogs, foxes, jackals, raccoons, and skunks. Current veterinary vaccines provide safe and effective immunity in cats against phylogroup I lyssaviruses, such as RABV, but not against divergent lyssaviruses in phylogroups II-IV. With the focus upon the global elimination of canine rabies, the emergence of rabies in cats represents a concerning trend. Clearly, education about the occurrence of rabies in cats needs to be improved, as well as the routine vaccination of cats to reduce the associated risks to public health, agriculture, and conservation biology from a One Health perspective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"volume\":\"16 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512395/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viruses-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16101635\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VIROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viruses-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/v16101635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
如今,人类狂犬病病例主要与狂犬病家犬感染有关。狗是全球常见的病毒库物种,会在其种群中延续狂犬病病毒 (RABV),而家猫与狗不同,报告或接种疫苗的频率要低得多。在流行病学上,猫是狂犬病毒的重要传播媒介,但不是病毒库。通常情况下,猫只是偶然的宿主,感染的是其所处地理位置的主要舔状病毒。在非洲、亚洲、欧洲和整个美洲都发生过与狂犬病猫有关的人类病例。野生猫科动物和家养猫科动物都是善于独处的猎手,它们在与受感染的猎物(如蝙蝠)互动时,或在被其他中食肉动物(如狂犬、狐狸、豺、浣熊和臭鼬)传播时,都有可能感染莱瑟病毒。目前的兽用疫苗可为猫提供安全、有效的免疫力,使其免受系统组 I lyssaviruses(如 RABV)的感染,但无法抵抗系统组 II-IV 的不同 lyssaviruses。随着狂犬病在全球范围内被消灭,猫狂犬病的出现代表了一种令人担忧的趋势。显然,需要加强有关猫狂犬病发生的教育,并对猫进行常规疫苗接种,以从 "一体健康 "的角度降低对公共卫生、农业和保护生物学的相关风险。
Human rabies cases today are predominantly associated with infection from rabid domestic dogs. Unlike dogs, a common global reservoir species that perpetuates rabies viruses (RABV) within their populations, domestic cats are much less frequently reported or vaccinated. Epidemiologically, cats are important vectors of lyssaviruses but are not viral reservoirs. Typically, cats are incidental hosts only, infected with the predominant lyssavirus in their geographic locale. Human cases associated with rabid cats have occurred in Africa, Asia, Europe and throughout the Americas. As adept, solitary hunters, wild and domestic felids are at risk of lyssavirus infection based upon interactions with infected prey, such as bats, or from transmission by other mesocarnivores, such as rabid dogs, foxes, jackals, raccoons, and skunks. Current veterinary vaccines provide safe and effective immunity in cats against phylogroup I lyssaviruses, such as RABV, but not against divergent lyssaviruses in phylogroups II-IV. With the focus upon the global elimination of canine rabies, the emergence of rabies in cats represents a concerning trend. Clearly, education about the occurrence of rabies in cats needs to be improved, as well as the routine vaccination of cats to reduce the associated risks to public health, agriculture, and conservation biology from a One Health perspective.
期刊介绍:
Viruses (ISSN 1999-4915) is an open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies of viruses. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications, conference reports and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. We also encourage the publication of timely reviews and commentaries on topics of interest to the virology community and feature highlights from the virology literature in the ''News and Views'' section. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.