当老年痴呆症患者表达错误信念时,工作人员应对措施的伦理问题。

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1177/09697330241295376
Feliciano Villar, Daniela Martínez
{"title":"当老年痴呆症患者表达错误信念时,工作人员应对措施的伦理问题。","authors":"Feliciano Villar, Daniela Martínez","doi":"10.1177/09697330241295376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Challenging false beliefs are common situations among people living with dementia. They frequently imply time-shifts, that is, situations in which the person re-lives past experiences. Since they have emotional implications and important ethical implications, they are difficult to manage by caregivers, who are faced with the decision of telling or not telling the truth.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to explore professional staff's perceptions of common and best practices to manage a situation in which a person living with dementia is having a false belief, specifically a time-shift. The study compares technical staff's and assistant carers' responses.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>Forty-two staff members working in four Spanish long-term care facilities were interviewed. 21 were assistant carers and 21 were technical staff.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This study involved a qualitative design, content-analyzing participant's responses to semi-structured interviews. Participants read a vignette about a person living with dementia having a time-shift and were asked (1) how a situation like that is commonly managed and (2) how it should be managed.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The principles of informed consent, confidentiality, and assessment of consequences for participants were observed throughout the entire study, which was approved by the University of Barcelona Ethics Committee (IRB 00003099). Written participant's consent was obtained prior to interviews.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>All the participants mentioned having experienced a situation similar to that described in the vignette. In the case of common practices, lying was the most frequently mentioned strategy. As for best practices, lying and telling the truth were mentioned as well as responses that lie in-between, such as distracting or relaxing. However, most assistant carers reported that they do not know how a challenging false belief should be managed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings stress the importance of organizational guidelines and staff development in the management of challenging false beliefs (and specifically time-shifts) in PLWD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330241295376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical aspects of staff responses when older people with dementia express false beliefs.\",\"authors\":\"Feliciano Villar, Daniela Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09697330241295376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Challenging false beliefs are common situations among people living with dementia. They frequently imply time-shifts, that is, situations in which the person re-lives past experiences. Since they have emotional implications and important ethical implications, they are difficult to manage by caregivers, who are faced with the decision of telling or not telling the truth.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to explore professional staff's perceptions of common and best practices to manage a situation in which a person living with dementia is having a false belief, specifically a time-shift. The study compares technical staff's and assistant carers' responses.</p><p><strong>Participants and research context: </strong>Forty-two staff members working in four Spanish long-term care facilities were interviewed. 21 were assistant carers and 21 were technical staff.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This study involved a qualitative design, content-analyzing participant's responses to semi-structured interviews. Participants read a vignette about a person living with dementia having a time-shift and were asked (1) how a situation like that is commonly managed and (2) how it should be managed.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The principles of informed consent, confidentiality, and assessment of consequences for participants were observed throughout the entire study, which was approved by the University of Barcelona Ethics Committee (IRB 00003099). Written participant's consent was obtained prior to interviews.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>All the participants mentioned having experienced a situation similar to that described in the vignette. In the case of common practices, lying was the most frequently mentioned strategy. As for best practices, lying and telling the truth were mentioned as well as responses that lie in-between, such as distracting or relaxing. However, most assistant carers reported that they do not know how a challenging false belief should be managed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings stress the importance of organizational guidelines and staff development in the management of challenging false beliefs (and specifically time-shifts) in PLWD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9697330241295376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241295376\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241295376","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:质疑错误信念是痴呆症患者常见的情况。它们经常意味着时空转换,即患者会重新回忆起过去的经历。研究目的:本研究旨在探讨专业人员在处理痴呆症患者出现错误信念(特别是时空转换)的情况时,对常见做法和最佳做法的看法。研究比较了技术人员和助理照护者的反应:我们对在西班牙四家长期护理机构工作的 42 名工作人员进行了访谈。研究设计:本研究采用定性设计,对参与者在半结构化访谈中的回答进行内容分析。参与者阅读了一个关于痴呆症患者进行时间轮班的小故事,并被问及:(1)通常是如何处理这种情况的;(2)应该如何处理这种情况:巴塞罗那大学伦理委员会(IRB 00003099)批准了这项研究,在整个研究过程中遵守了知情同意、保密和评估参与者后果的原则。访谈前已获得参与者的书面同意:所有参与者都提到自己经历过与小故事中描述的类似情况。在常见做法方面,撒谎是最常被提及的策略。至于最佳做法,人们提到了撒谎和说实话,以及介于两者之间的应对方法,如转移注意力或放松。然而,大多数助理护理人员表示,他们不知道应该如何处理具有挑战性的错误信念:我们的研究结果表明,在处理 PLWD 中具有挑战性的错误观念(特别是时间转换)时,组织指南和员工发展非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical aspects of staff responses when older people with dementia express false beliefs.

Background: Challenging false beliefs are common situations among people living with dementia. They frequently imply time-shifts, that is, situations in which the person re-lives past experiences. Since they have emotional implications and important ethical implications, they are difficult to manage by caregivers, who are faced with the decision of telling or not telling the truth.

Aims: The study aimed to explore professional staff's perceptions of common and best practices to manage a situation in which a person living with dementia is having a false belief, specifically a time-shift. The study compares technical staff's and assistant carers' responses.

Participants and research context: Forty-two staff members working in four Spanish long-term care facilities were interviewed. 21 were assistant carers and 21 were technical staff.

Research design: This study involved a qualitative design, content-analyzing participant's responses to semi-structured interviews. Participants read a vignette about a person living with dementia having a time-shift and were asked (1) how a situation like that is commonly managed and (2) how it should be managed.

Ethical considerations: The principles of informed consent, confidentiality, and assessment of consequences for participants were observed throughout the entire study, which was approved by the University of Barcelona Ethics Committee (IRB 00003099). Written participant's consent was obtained prior to interviews.

Findings: All the participants mentioned having experienced a situation similar to that described in the vignette. In the case of common practices, lying was the most frequently mentioned strategy. As for best practices, lying and telling the truth were mentioned as well as responses that lie in-between, such as distracting or relaxing. However, most assistant carers reported that they do not know how a challenging false belief should be managed.

Conclusion: Our findings stress the importance of organizational guidelines and staff development in the management of challenging false beliefs (and specifically time-shifts) in PLWD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
期刊最新文献
Sources of moral distress in nursing professionals: A scoping review. Truth-telling, and ethical considerations in terminal care: an Eastern perspective. Ethical considerations in the UK-Nepal nurse recruitment: Nepali nurses' perspectives. Nurses on the outside, problems on the inside! The duty of nurses to support unions. Care and justice reasoning in nurses' everyday ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1