经桡动脉进行冠状动脉介入治疗时的疼痛强度。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.5114/aic.2024.142203
Tomasz Bochenek, Adam Pytlewski, Michał Lelek, Bartosz Gruchlik, Maciej Podolski, Małgorzata Teodorska, Jan Szczogiel, Marek Grabka, Katarzyna Mizia-Stec
{"title":"经桡动脉进行冠状动脉介入治疗时的疼痛强度。","authors":"Tomasz Bochenek, Adam Pytlewski, Michał Lelek, Bartosz Gruchlik, Maciej Podolski, Małgorzata Teodorska, Jan Szczogiel, Marek Grabka, Katarzyna Mizia-Stec","doi":"10.5114/aic.2024.142203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radial access reduces vascular complications compared to femoral access. Various factors may influence the patient's pain during coronary intervention.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess what clinical and periprocedural factors affect discomfort and pain intensity during angiography via the radial artery without use of spasmolytics.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A group of 238 patients (M/F 142/96, mean age: 67 ±10 years) who underwent coronary angiography and interventions through the radial artery approach was studied. Every patient had ultrasound assessment of the radial artery. Pain was assessed according to the numerical pain rating scale, where mild pain is 1-3, moderate pain is 4-7, and severe pain is above 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 238 patients. Most of the participants had a low pain level (<i>n</i> = 133 (55.88%)), while a smaller number had moderate and severe pain level (<i>n</i> = 88 (36.97%) and <i>n</i> = 17 (7.14%), respectively). We analyzed 38 characteristics of the patients in terms of the possible influence on the pain level during angiography.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study we analyzed possible factors which may contribute to the severe pain sensation during percutaneous coronary intervention. We found that masculine gender, greater weight and height as well as diabetes mellitus and myocardial infarction diagnosis on admission correlated with lower pain level. Conversely, greater maximal and minimal diameters of the radial artery correlated with stronger pain level.</p>","PeriodicalId":49678,"journal":{"name":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","volume":"20 3","pages":"264-270"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensity of pain during coronary interventions via the radial artery.\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Bochenek, Adam Pytlewski, Michał Lelek, Bartosz Gruchlik, Maciej Podolski, Małgorzata Teodorska, Jan Szczogiel, Marek Grabka, Katarzyna Mizia-Stec\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/aic.2024.142203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Radial access reduces vascular complications compared to femoral access. Various factors may influence the patient's pain during coronary intervention.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess what clinical and periprocedural factors affect discomfort and pain intensity during angiography via the radial artery without use of spasmolytics.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A group of 238 patients (M/F 142/96, mean age: 67 ±10 years) who underwent coronary angiography and interventions through the radial artery approach was studied. Every patient had ultrasound assessment of the radial artery. Pain was assessed according to the numerical pain rating scale, where mild pain is 1-3, moderate pain is 4-7, and severe pain is above 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 238 patients. Most of the participants had a low pain level (<i>n</i> = 133 (55.88%)), while a smaller number had moderate and severe pain level (<i>n</i> = 88 (36.97%) and <i>n</i> = 17 (7.14%), respectively). We analyzed 38 characteristics of the patients in terms of the possible influence on the pain level during angiography.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study we analyzed possible factors which may contribute to the severe pain sensation during percutaneous coronary intervention. We found that masculine gender, greater weight and height as well as diabetes mellitus and myocardial infarction diagnosis on admission correlated with lower pain level. Conversely, greater maximal and minimal diameters of the radial artery correlated with stronger pain level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"264-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.142203\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.142203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介与股动脉入路相比,桡动脉入路可减少血管并发症。目的:在不使用解痉剂的情况下,评估哪些临床和围手术期因素会影响经桡动脉进行血管造影时的不适感和疼痛强度:研究对象包括 238 名通过桡动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的患者(男/女 142/96,平均年龄:67 ± 10 岁)。每位患者都接受了桡动脉超声评估。疼痛根据数字疼痛评分表进行评估,轻度疼痛为 1-3,中度疼痛为 4-7,重度疼痛为 7 以上:我们共纳入了 238 名患者。大多数参与者的疼痛程度较轻(133 人(55.88%)),而中度和重度疼痛者较少(分别为 88 人(36.97%)和 17 人(7.14%))。我们分析了血管造影过程中可能影响疼痛程度的 38 个患者特征:在研究中,我们分析了可能导致经皮冠状动脉介入术中剧烈疼痛感觉的因素。我们发现,男性的性别、较高的体重和身高以及糖尿病和入院时的心肌梗死诊断与较低的疼痛程度相关。相反,桡动脉的最大和最小直径越大,疼痛程度越重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intensity of pain during coronary interventions via the radial artery.

Introduction: Radial access reduces vascular complications compared to femoral access. Various factors may influence the patient's pain during coronary intervention.

Aim: To assess what clinical and periprocedural factors affect discomfort and pain intensity during angiography via the radial artery without use of spasmolytics.

Material and methods: A group of 238 patients (M/F 142/96, mean age: 67 ±10 years) who underwent coronary angiography and interventions through the radial artery approach was studied. Every patient had ultrasound assessment of the radial artery. Pain was assessed according to the numerical pain rating scale, where mild pain is 1-3, moderate pain is 4-7, and severe pain is above 7.

Results: We included 238 patients. Most of the participants had a low pain level (n = 133 (55.88%)), while a smaller number had moderate and severe pain level (n = 88 (36.97%) and n = 17 (7.14%), respectively). We analyzed 38 characteristics of the patients in terms of the possible influence on the pain level during angiography.

Conclusions: In our study we analyzed possible factors which may contribute to the severe pain sensation during percutaneous coronary intervention. We found that masculine gender, greater weight and height as well as diabetes mellitus and myocardial infarction diagnosis on admission correlated with lower pain level. Conversely, greater maximal and minimal diameters of the radial artery correlated with stronger pain level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej/Advances in Interventional Cardiology is indexed in: Index Copernicus, Ministry of Science and Higher Education Index (MNiSW). Advances in Interventional Cardiology is a quarterly aimed at specialists, mainly at cardiologists and cardiosurgeons. Official journal of the Association on Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society.
期刊最新文献
A new and easy parameter to predict the requirement for permanent pacemaker implantation after transaortic valve implantation: aortic knob calcification. A treatment strategy using directional coronary atherectomy for percutaneous coronary intervention in calcified nodules. Cardiac troponin I release after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects is associated with supraventricular arrhythmias on early follow-up. Commentary: A multi-center study of the MicroNET-covered stent in consecutive patients with acute carotid-related stroke: SAFEGUARD-STROKE. Efficacy of oral treprostinil for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1