冠状动脉周围脂肪厚度在预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性全闭塞后长期预后中的作用。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.5114/aic.2024.142232
Aziz Inan Celik, Tahir Bezgin, Burcu Kodal, Emre Oner, Ali Cevat Tanalp, Metin Cagdas
{"title":"冠状动脉周围脂肪厚度在预测经皮冠状动脉介入治疗慢性全闭塞后长期预后中的作用。","authors":"Aziz Inan Celik, Tahir Bezgin, Burcu Kodal, Emre Oner, Ali Cevat Tanalp, Metin Cagdas","doi":"10.5114/aic.2024.142232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pericoronary fat thickness (PFT) is a well-established marker crucial for evaluating the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). While its role in CAD is widely acknowledged, a considerable gap exists in understanding the prognostic implications of PFT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), specifically for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated the relationship between PFT and prognostic outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for CTO.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study analyzed data from 415 patients who had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary angiography (CAG). PFT measurements were taken, and patients were categorized into normal, PCI (non-CTO), and CTO-PCI groups. Prognostic implications within the CTO-PCI group were evaluated based on survival status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PFT measurements varied significantly among groups. The CTO-PCI group had a 13.9% mortality rate over a median follow-up of 16.6 ±10.3 months. Higher average PFT values were found in the non-survival group (<i>p</i> = 0.013). ROC curve analysis identified an average PFT cut-off value of 13.6 mm (AUC = 0.682, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Cox regression analysis linked mortality with LVEF (HR = 0.938, <i>p</i> = 0.001), albumin (HR = 0.189, <i>p</i> = 0.006), and average PFT (HR = 1.252, <i>p</i> = 0.040). Elevated average PFT was associated with higher mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PFT is a significant inflammatory marker and a promising prognostic indicator following PCI for CTO. Integrating PFT into risk prediction models may enhance prognostic accuracy and aid in timely clinical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49678,"journal":{"name":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","volume":"20 3","pages":"285-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of pericoronary fat thickness in prediction of long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions.\",\"authors\":\"Aziz Inan Celik, Tahir Bezgin, Burcu Kodal, Emre Oner, Ali Cevat Tanalp, Metin Cagdas\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/aic.2024.142232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pericoronary fat thickness (PFT) is a well-established marker crucial for evaluating the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). While its role in CAD is widely acknowledged, a considerable gap exists in understanding the prognostic implications of PFT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), specifically for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study investigated the relationship between PFT and prognostic outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for CTO.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study analyzed data from 415 patients who had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary angiography (CAG). PFT measurements were taken, and patients were categorized into normal, PCI (non-CTO), and CTO-PCI groups. Prognostic implications within the CTO-PCI group were evaluated based on survival status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PFT measurements varied significantly among groups. The CTO-PCI group had a 13.9% mortality rate over a median follow-up of 16.6 ±10.3 months. Higher average PFT values were found in the non-survival group (<i>p</i> = 0.013). ROC curve analysis identified an average PFT cut-off value of 13.6 mm (AUC = 0.682, <i>p</i> = 0.011). Cox regression analysis linked mortality with LVEF (HR = 0.938, <i>p</i> = 0.001), albumin (HR = 0.189, <i>p</i> = 0.006), and average PFT (HR = 1.252, <i>p</i> = 0.040). Elevated average PFT was associated with higher mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PFT is a significant inflammatory marker and a promising prognostic indicator following PCI for CTO. Integrating PFT into risk prediction models may enhance prognostic accuracy and aid in timely clinical interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"285-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11506398/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.142232\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2024.142232","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:冠状动脉周围脂肪厚度(PFT)是一种公认的标记物,对评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的范围和严重程度至关重要。虽然其在 CAD 中的作用已得到广泛认可,但对于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后 PFT 的预后影响,尤其是冠状动脉慢性全闭塞(CTO)的预后影响,还存在相当大的差距:一项回顾性研究分析了415名接受冠状动脉计算机断层扫描(CCTA)和冠状动脉造影术(CAG)患者的数据。对患者进行了 PFT 测量,并将其分为正常组、PCI(非 CTO)组和 CTO-PCI 组。根据生存状况评估CTO-PCI组的预后影响:结果:各组间的 PFT 测量值差异显著。在 16.6 ± 10.3 个月的中位随访期间,CTO-PCI 组的死亡率为 13.9%。未存活组的 PFT 平均值更高(P = 0.013)。ROC 曲线分析确定平均 PFT 临界值为 13.6 mm(AUC = 0.682,p = 0.011)。Cox 回归分析将死亡率与 LVEF(HR = 0.938,p = 0.001)、白蛋白(HR = 0.189,p = 0.006)和平均 PFT(HR = 1.252,p = 0.040)联系起来。平均 PFT 升高与死亡率升高有关(P = 0.001):结论:PFT是一种重要的炎症标志物,也是CTO患者PCI术后的预后指标。将 PFT 纳入风险预测模型可提高预后的准确性,有助于及时进行临床干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of pericoronary fat thickness in prediction of long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions.

Introduction: Pericoronary fat thickness (PFT) is a well-established marker crucial for evaluating the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). While its role in CAD is widely acknowledged, a considerable gap exists in understanding the prognostic implications of PFT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), specifically for coronary chronic total occlusions (CTO).

Aim: This study investigated the relationship between PFT and prognostic outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for CTO.

Material and methods: A retrospective study analyzed data from 415 patients who had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and coronary angiography (CAG). PFT measurements were taken, and patients were categorized into normal, PCI (non-CTO), and CTO-PCI groups. Prognostic implications within the CTO-PCI group were evaluated based on survival status.

Results: PFT measurements varied significantly among groups. The CTO-PCI group had a 13.9% mortality rate over a median follow-up of 16.6 ±10.3 months. Higher average PFT values were found in the non-survival group (p = 0.013). ROC curve analysis identified an average PFT cut-off value of 13.6 mm (AUC = 0.682, p = 0.011). Cox regression analysis linked mortality with LVEF (HR = 0.938, p = 0.001), albumin (HR = 0.189, p = 0.006), and average PFT (HR = 1.252, p = 0.040). Elevated average PFT was associated with higher mortality (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: PFT is a significant inflammatory marker and a promising prognostic indicator following PCI for CTO. Integrating PFT into risk prediction models may enhance prognostic accuracy and aid in timely clinical interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Postepy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej/Advances in Interventional Cardiology is indexed in: Index Copernicus, Ministry of Science and Higher Education Index (MNiSW). Advances in Interventional Cardiology is a quarterly aimed at specialists, mainly at cardiologists and cardiosurgeons. Official journal of the Association on Cardiovascular Interventions of the Polish Cardiac Society.
期刊最新文献
A new and easy parameter to predict the requirement for permanent pacemaker implantation after transaortic valve implantation: aortic knob calcification. A treatment strategy using directional coronary atherectomy for percutaneous coronary intervention in calcified nodules. Cardiac troponin I release after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects is associated with supraventricular arrhythmias on early follow-up. Commentary: A multi-center study of the MicroNET-covered stent in consecutive patients with acute carotid-related stroke: SAFEGUARD-STROKE. Efficacy of oral treprostinil for treating pulmonary arterial hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1