用超声归一化局部方差评估代谢功能障碍相关脂肪肝。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110326
Lauren D. Hagenstein , Joseph Jenkins , Colby Adamson , Jourdain Dong , John Moore , Jing Gao
{"title":"用超声归一化局部方差评估代谢功能障碍相关脂肪肝。","authors":"Lauren D. Hagenstein ,&nbsp;Joseph Jenkins ,&nbsp;Colby Adamson ,&nbsp;Jourdain Dong ,&nbsp;John Moore ,&nbsp;Jing Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Increased prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) highlights a desire for screening with liver ultrasound normalized local variance (NLV). We aimed to assess variations in NLV values measured at different sampling depths and discuss common technical considerations in measuring liver NLV.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively measured liver NLVs at variable depths on ultrasound images pre-recorded in 116 participants who underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and ultrasound to screen for MASLD. Liver NLVs were measured and differences at variable depths were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple paired comparisons using post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD), Scheffé, Bonferroni, and Holm multiple comparisons. Diagnostic performance of NLV values were analyzed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The NLV measured at a depth of 10 cm significantly differed from those measured near the liver capsule and at depths of 6 cm and 8 cm (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) from the skin. There was no significant difference in NLV value in other paired groups (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). The difference in the area under AUROCs for NLVs measured at variable depths was not significant (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The best diagnostic performance of liver NLV was measured at depth of 8 cm from the skin, although NLV measured at variable depth showed similar diagnostic performance for assessing ≥ mild hepatic steatosis. The study results provide a reference that can be used in the development of standardized scanning protocols and technical considerations in measuring liver NLV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 110326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound normalized local variance to assess metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease\",\"authors\":\"Lauren D. Hagenstein ,&nbsp;Joseph Jenkins ,&nbsp;Colby Adamson ,&nbsp;Jourdain Dong ,&nbsp;John Moore ,&nbsp;Jing Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Increased prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) highlights a desire for screening with liver ultrasound normalized local variance (NLV). We aimed to assess variations in NLV values measured at different sampling depths and discuss common technical considerations in measuring liver NLV.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively measured liver NLVs at variable depths on ultrasound images pre-recorded in 116 participants who underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and ultrasound to screen for MASLD. Liver NLVs were measured and differences at variable depths were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple paired comparisons using post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD), Scheffé, Bonferroni, and Holm multiple comparisons. Diagnostic performance of NLV values were analyzed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The NLV measured at a depth of 10 cm significantly differed from those measured near the liver capsule and at depths of 6 cm and 8 cm (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) from the skin. There was no significant difference in NLV value in other paired groups (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). The difference in the area under AUROCs for NLVs measured at variable depths was not significant (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The best diagnostic performance of liver NLV was measured at depth of 8 cm from the skin, although NLV measured at variable depth showed similar diagnostic performance for assessing ≥ mild hepatic steatosis. The study results provide a reference that can be used in the development of standardized scanning protocols and technical considerations in measuring liver NLV.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002560\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)发病率的增加凸显了利用肝脏超声归一化局部方差(NLV)进行筛查的愿望。我们旨在评估在不同取样深度测量的 NLV 值的差异,并讨论测量肝脏 NLV 的常见技术注意事项:我们回顾性地测量了116名接受肝脏磁共振成像-质子密度脂肪分数(MRI-PDFF)和超声检查以筛查MASLD的参与者的超声图像上不同深度的肝脏NLV。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和事后Tukey诚实显著性差异(HSD)、Scheffé、Bonferroni和Holm多重比较对不同深度的肝脏NLV进行测量和差异检验。通过接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分析了 NLV 值的诊断性能:结果:在 10 厘米深度测量的 NLV 值与在肝囊附近以及 6 厘米和 8 厘米深度测量的 NLV 值有明显差异(P 0.05)。在不同深度测量的 NLV 的 AUROCs 下面积差异不显著(P > 0.05):结论:尽管不同深度测量的肝脏无损检测值在评估≥轻度肝脏脂肪变性时显示出相似的诊断性能,但距离皮肤 8 厘米深度测量的肝脏无损检测值诊断性能最佳。研究结果为制定标准化扫描方案和测量肝脏无淋巴细胞数的技术注意事项提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ultrasound normalized local variance to assess metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Purpose

Increased prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) highlights a desire for screening with liver ultrasound normalized local variance (NLV). We aimed to assess variations in NLV values measured at different sampling depths and discuss common technical considerations in measuring liver NLV.

Methods

We retrospectively measured liver NLVs at variable depths on ultrasound images pre-recorded in 116 participants who underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) and ultrasound to screen for MASLD. Liver NLVs were measured and differences at variable depths were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple paired comparisons using post hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD), Scheffé, Bonferroni, and Holm multiple comparisons. Diagnostic performance of NLV values were analyzed by area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve.

Results

The NLV measured at a depth of 10 cm significantly differed from those measured near the liver capsule and at depths of 6 cm and 8 cm (p < 0.001) from the skin. There was no significant difference in NLV value in other paired groups (p > 0.05). The difference in the area under AUROCs for NLVs measured at variable depths was not significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

The best diagnostic performance of liver NLV was measured at depth of 8 cm from the skin, although NLV measured at variable depth showed similar diagnostic performance for assessing ≥ mild hepatic steatosis. The study results provide a reference that can be used in the development of standardized scanning protocols and technical considerations in measuring liver NLV.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
期刊最新文献
Contents Mechanical clot disruption during pulmonary thromboembolectomy is safe: A propensity score-matched analysis Evaluation of aortic stent endoleaks in the renally impaired patient with ferumoxytol-enhanced MR angiography Advancing breast cancer screening through information-theoretic approaches and AI Corrigendum to “Comprehensive multimodality imaging review of reproductive interventions and their complications” [Clin. Imaging (December 2024) 110312]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1