Shuyang Han , Robert Frangie , Nicholas D. Lanfermeijer, Jonathan E. Gold, Sabir K. Ismaily, Andrew Yoo, Camryn A. Pletka, David Rodriguez-Quintana
{"title":"在固定股骨假体周围骨折时,缝合式陶瓷包扎在生物力学上是否优于传统的金属陶瓷包扎:一项配对尸体研究。","authors":"Shuyang Han , Robert Frangie , Nicholas D. Lanfermeijer, Jonathan E. Gold, Sabir K. Ismaily, Andrew Yoo, Camryn A. Pletka, David Rodriguez-Quintana","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While traditional metallic cerclage remains the primary method in clinical application, non-metallic cerclage systems have recently gained popularity due to low risks of soft tissue irritation and bone intrusion. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of a novel non-metallic suture-based cerclage in comparison to traditional metallic cerclage cables for fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An extended trochanteric osteotomy was performed on eight pairs of cadaveric femora, followed by reduction using either metallic cerclages (Group I) or the suture-based cerclage (Group II). A modular tapered fluted stem was then implanted in each specimen. The fragment translation during canal preparation and stem implantation was quantified using laser-scanning. Subsequently, each specimen underwent 500 cycles of multiaxial loading, with fragment translation and stem subsidence measured using a motion capture system.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Following stem implantation, specimens in Group II exhibited a significantly greater lateral fragment translation (466 μm vs 754 μm, <em>p</em> = 0.017). However, there were no significant differences in anterior and distal translation between groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05). During multiaxial loading, the average stem subsidence in Group I was 0.36 mm (range, 0.04–1.42 mm), compared to 0.41 mm (range, 0.03–1.29) in Group II (<em>p</em> > 0.05). No significant difference was found in fragment translations between the two groups (p > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The suture-based cerclage system exhibited comparable biomechanical performance in fixation stability to conventional metallic cerclage cables. Yet, it was associated with a larger residual lateral gap between the fragments following stem implantation. Ultimately, the choice of fixation method should account for multiple factors, including patient characteristics, surgeon preference, and bone quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is suture-based cerclage biomechanically superior to traditional metallic cerclage for fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures: A matched pair cadaveric study\",\"authors\":\"Shuyang Han , Robert Frangie , Nicholas D. Lanfermeijer, Jonathan E. Gold, Sabir K. Ismaily, Andrew Yoo, Camryn A. Pletka, David Rodriguez-Quintana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While traditional metallic cerclage remains the primary method in clinical application, non-metallic cerclage systems have recently gained popularity due to low risks of soft tissue irritation and bone intrusion. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of a novel non-metallic suture-based cerclage in comparison to traditional metallic cerclage cables for fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An extended trochanteric osteotomy was performed on eight pairs of cadaveric femora, followed by reduction using either metallic cerclages (Group I) or the suture-based cerclage (Group II). A modular tapered fluted stem was then implanted in each specimen. The fragment translation during canal preparation and stem implantation was quantified using laser-scanning. Subsequently, each specimen underwent 500 cycles of multiaxial loading, with fragment translation and stem subsidence measured using a motion capture system.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Following stem implantation, specimens in Group II exhibited a significantly greater lateral fragment translation (466 μm vs 754 μm, <em>p</em> = 0.017). However, there were no significant differences in anterior and distal translation between groups (<em>p</em> > 0.05). During multiaxial loading, the average stem subsidence in Group I was 0.36 mm (range, 0.04–1.42 mm), compared to 0.41 mm (range, 0.03–1.29) in Group II (<em>p</em> > 0.05). No significant difference was found in fragment translations between the two groups (p > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The suture-based cerclage system exhibited comparable biomechanical performance in fixation stability to conventional metallic cerclage cables. Yet, it was associated with a larger residual lateral gap between the fragments following stem implantation. Ultimately, the choice of fixation method should account for multiple factors, including patient characteristics, surgeon preference, and bone quality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324001943\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324001943","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is suture-based cerclage biomechanically superior to traditional metallic cerclage for fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures: A matched pair cadaveric study
Background
While traditional metallic cerclage remains the primary method in clinical application, non-metallic cerclage systems have recently gained popularity due to low risks of soft tissue irritation and bone intrusion. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of a novel non-metallic suture-based cerclage in comparison to traditional metallic cerclage cables for fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Methods
An extended trochanteric osteotomy was performed on eight pairs of cadaveric femora, followed by reduction using either metallic cerclages (Group I) or the suture-based cerclage (Group II). A modular tapered fluted stem was then implanted in each specimen. The fragment translation during canal preparation and stem implantation was quantified using laser-scanning. Subsequently, each specimen underwent 500 cycles of multiaxial loading, with fragment translation and stem subsidence measured using a motion capture system.
Findings
Following stem implantation, specimens in Group II exhibited a significantly greater lateral fragment translation (466 μm vs 754 μm, p = 0.017). However, there were no significant differences in anterior and distal translation between groups (p > 0.05). During multiaxial loading, the average stem subsidence in Group I was 0.36 mm (range, 0.04–1.42 mm), compared to 0.41 mm (range, 0.03–1.29) in Group II (p > 0.05). No significant difference was found in fragment translations between the two groups (p > 0.05).
Interpretation
The suture-based cerclage system exhibited comparable biomechanical performance in fixation stability to conventional metallic cerclage cables. Yet, it was associated with a larger residual lateral gap between the fragments following stem implantation. Ultimately, the choice of fixation method should account for multiple factors, including patient characteristics, surgeon preference, and bone quality.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.