[基因组编辑食品的安全意识和现行安全确认方法研究]。

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Hygiene and Safety Science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3358/shokueishi.65.89
Chie Taguchi, Norihito Shibata, Kazunari Kondo
{"title":"[基因组编辑食品的安全意识和现行安全确认方法研究]。","authors":"Chie Taguchi, Norihito Shibata, Kazunari Kondo","doi":"10.3358/shokueishi.65.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the safety of genome-edited foods in Japan has been confirmed through pre-submission consultation under the notification process, public perception of safety confirmation methodology has not been investigated to date. Therefore, we created three media to provide information on the safety assurance of genome-edited foods and surveyed the perception of current safety confirmation. In addition, we examined the opinions of researchers in health science on current safety confirmation methods. As a result, 62% of general consumers and 68% of researchers in health science recognized that safety is ensured. Acceptance of genome-edited foods improved when they realized that safety was ensured. Researchers in health science who felt that safety confirmation was insufficient were concerned about the third-party verification. Therefore, it was suggested that in order to boost public understanding of genome-edited foods, it would be useful to inform the public by communicating in an easy-to-understand way the safety assurance approaches being made in pre-submission consultation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54373,"journal":{"name":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","volume":"65 4","pages":"89-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Research on Safety Awareness and Current Safety Confirmation Methods for Genome-edited Foods].\",\"authors\":\"Chie Taguchi, Norihito Shibata, Kazunari Kondo\",\"doi\":\"10.3358/shokueishi.65.89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although the safety of genome-edited foods in Japan has been confirmed through pre-submission consultation under the notification process, public perception of safety confirmation methodology has not been investigated to date. Therefore, we created three media to provide information on the safety assurance of genome-edited foods and surveyed the perception of current safety confirmation. In addition, we examined the opinions of researchers in health science on current safety confirmation methods. As a result, 62% of general consumers and 68% of researchers in health science recognized that safety is ensured. Acceptance of genome-edited foods improved when they realized that safety was ensured. Researchers in health science who felt that safety confirmation was insufficient were concerned about the third-party verification. Therefore, it was suggested that in order to boost public understanding of genome-edited foods, it would be useful to inform the public by communicating in an easy-to-understand way the safety assurance approaches being made in pre-submission consultation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Hygiene and Safety Science\",\"volume\":\"65 4\",\"pages\":\"89-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Hygiene and Safety Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.65.89\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.65.89","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然在日本,基因组编辑食品的安全性已通过申报程序下的提交前咨询得到确认,但迄今为止尚未调查过公众对安全性确认方法的看法。因此,我们制作了三种媒体来提供有关基因组编辑食品安全保证的信息,并调查了公众对当前安全确认方法的看法。此外,我们还调查了健康科学研究人员对当前安全确认方法的看法。结果显示,62%的普通消费者和 68% 的健康科学研究人员认为安全是有保障的。当消费者认识到基因组编辑食品的安全性有保障时,他们对基因组编辑食品的接受度就会提高。认为安全性确认不足的健康科学研究人员对第三方验证表示担忧。因此,研究人员建议,为了提高公众对基因组编辑食品的认识,在提交前的咨询中以通俗易懂的方式向公众宣传安全保证的方法将是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Research on Safety Awareness and Current Safety Confirmation Methods for Genome-edited Foods].

Although the safety of genome-edited foods in Japan has been confirmed through pre-submission consultation under the notification process, public perception of safety confirmation methodology has not been investigated to date. Therefore, we created three media to provide information on the safety assurance of genome-edited foods and surveyed the perception of current safety confirmation. In addition, we examined the opinions of researchers in health science on current safety confirmation methods. As a result, 62% of general consumers and 68% of researchers in health science recognized that safety is ensured. Acceptance of genome-edited foods improved when they realized that safety was ensured. Researchers in health science who felt that safety confirmation was insufficient were concerned about the third-party verification. Therefore, it was suggested that in order to boost public understanding of genome-edited foods, it would be useful to inform the public by communicating in an easy-to-understand way the safety assurance approaches being made in pre-submission consultation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Hygiene and Safety Science
Food Hygiene and Safety Science Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
[Analytical Method for Melengestrol Acetate in Livestock Products Using LC-MS/MS]. [Establishment of Rapid Simultaneous Analysis Method for Plant Toxins by LC-TOF-MS]. [Implementation and Evaluation of Risk Communication Regarding Residual Pesticides]. [Improved Indophenol Titration Method for Ascorbic Acid Using a Dropper and Electronic Balance: Enhanced Convenience and Efficiency]. [Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods for Processed Foods Containing Soybean or Maize].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1