[将 VIG-Express 问卷作为快速多维老年评估工具的可行性、可靠性和有效性:一项多中心研究]。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Atencion Primaria Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103108
Núria Gutiérrez Jiménez , Eva Satué-Gracia , Joan Carles Contel , Josep Basora Gallisà , Jordi Amblàs-Novellas
{"title":"[将 VIG-Express 问卷作为快速多维老年评估工具的可行性、可靠性和有效性:一项多中心研究]。","authors":"Núria Gutiérrez Jiménez ,&nbsp;Eva Satué-Gracia ,&nbsp;Joan Carles Contel ,&nbsp;Josep Basora Gallisà ,&nbsp;Jordi Amblàs-Novellas","doi":"10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility, reliability and validity of the VIG-express questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional and multicenter study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Catalonia.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>24 professionals from 18 centers: 10 from Primary Care, 5 from hospitals acute, 2 intermediate care and 3 residential.</div></div><div><h3>Main measurements</h3><div>For the feasibility analysis, the administration time -mean and standard deviation (SD)-. The questionnaire was administered twice to the same patient by the same professional (intraobserver agreement), or by two different professionals (interobserver agreement), evaluating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Discriminant validity was calculated by comparing the responses of subgroup with higher fragility (percentile &gt;<!--> <!-->75) and subgroup with lower fragility (percentile &lt;<!--> <!-->25), for each item of the questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>195 questionnaires were administered, 59 repeatedly, in a group of elderly (mean age of 79 years) and fragile (mean score of 0.33 in the Fragile Index-VIG). The average administration time was 6.52<!--> <!-->minutes (DE: 6.02). The concordance in the degree of fragility score obtained a ICC of 0.95 (intraobserver) and 0.72 (interobserver). In discriminant validity, the differences in response frequencies between the two subgroups ranged from 1.7 (oncological disease) to 67.1 (medication management), all of which were statistically significant (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05), with the sole exceptions of the presence of oncological and neurological diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The VIG-express questionnaire appears to be a feasible, reliable and valid tool for rapid multidimensional/geriatric assessment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55435,"journal":{"name":"Atencion Primaria","volume":"57 4","pages":"Article 103108"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factibilidad, fiabilidad y validez del cuestionario VIG-express como instrumento de valoración multidimensional/geriátrica rápida: estudio multicéntrico\",\"authors\":\"Núria Gutiérrez Jiménez ,&nbsp;Eva Satué-Gracia ,&nbsp;Joan Carles Contel ,&nbsp;Josep Basora Gallisà ,&nbsp;Jordi Amblàs-Novellas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility, reliability and validity of the VIG-express questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional and multicenter study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Catalonia.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>24 professionals from 18 centers: 10 from Primary Care, 5 from hospitals acute, 2 intermediate care and 3 residential.</div></div><div><h3>Main measurements</h3><div>For the feasibility analysis, the administration time -mean and standard deviation (SD)-. The questionnaire was administered twice to the same patient by the same professional (intraobserver agreement), or by two different professionals (interobserver agreement), evaluating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Discriminant validity was calculated by comparing the responses of subgroup with higher fragility (percentile &gt;<!--> <!-->75) and subgroup with lower fragility (percentile &lt;<!--> <!-->25), for each item of the questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>195 questionnaires were administered, 59 repeatedly, in a group of elderly (mean age of 79 years) and fragile (mean score of 0.33 in the Fragile Index-VIG). The average administration time was 6.52<!--> <!-->minutes (DE: 6.02). The concordance in the degree of fragility score obtained a ICC of 0.95 (intraobserver) and 0.72 (interobserver). In discriminant validity, the differences in response frequencies between the two subgroups ranged from 1.7 (oncological disease) to 67.1 (medication management), all of which were statistically significant (p<!--> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05), with the sole exceptions of the presence of oncological and neurological diseases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The VIG-express questionnaire appears to be a feasible, reliable and valid tool for rapid multidimensional/geriatric assessment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atencion Primaria\",\"volume\":\"57 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 103108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atencion Primaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656724002506\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atencion Primaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0212656724002506","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 评估 VIG-express 问卷的可行性、可靠性和有效性:评估 VIG-express 问卷的可行性、可靠性和有效性:描述性、观察性、横断面和多中心研究:参与者:来自 18 个中心的 24 名专业人员:主要测量指标:主要测量指标:可行性分析中的施测时间--平均值和标准差(SD)。由同一专业人员(观察者内部一致)或两名不同专业人员(观察者之间一致)对同一患者进行两次问卷调查,评估类内相关系数(ICC)。通过比较脆性较高的亚组(百分位数大于 75)和脆性较低的亚组(百分位数 小于 75)的回答,计算判别效度:对一组老年人(平均年龄 79 岁)和脆性体质者(脆性指数-VIG 平均得分为 0.33)进行了 195 次问卷调查,其中 59 次重复进行。平均发放时间为 6.52 分钟(DE:6.02)。脆性程度评分的 ICC 为 0.95(观察者内)和 0.72(观察者间)。在判别有效性方面,两个亚组之间的回答频率差异从 1.7(肿瘤疾病)到 67.1(药物管理)不等,均具有统计学意义(p 结论:VIG-express 问卷似乎是一种可行、可靠且有效的多维度/老年医学快速评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factibilidad, fiabilidad y validez del cuestionario VIG-express como instrumento de valoración multidimensional/geriátrica rápida: estudio multicéntrico

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility, reliability and validity of the VIG-express questionnaire.

Design

Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional and multicenter study.

Setting

Catalonia.

Participants

24 professionals from 18 centers: 10 from Primary Care, 5 from hospitals acute, 2 intermediate care and 3 residential.

Main measurements

For the feasibility analysis, the administration time -mean and standard deviation (SD)-. The questionnaire was administered twice to the same patient by the same professional (intraobserver agreement), or by two different professionals (interobserver agreement), evaluating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Discriminant validity was calculated by comparing the responses of subgroup with higher fragility (percentile > 75) and subgroup with lower fragility (percentile < 25), for each item of the questionnaire.

Results

195 questionnaires were administered, 59 repeatedly, in a group of elderly (mean age of 79 years) and fragile (mean score of 0.33 in the Fragile Index-VIG). The average administration time was 6.52 minutes (DE: 6.02). The concordance in the degree of fragility score obtained a ICC of 0.95 (intraobserver) and 0.72 (interobserver). In discriminant validity, the differences in response frequencies between the two subgroups ranged from 1.7 (oncological disease) to 67.1 (medication management), all of which were statistically significant (p < 0.05), with the sole exceptions of the presence of oncological and neurological diseases.

Conclusions

The VIG-express questionnaire appears to be a feasible, reliable and valid tool for rapid multidimensional/geriatric assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atencion Primaria
Atencion Primaria 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
156
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Atención Primaria es una revista que publica trabajos de investigación relativos al ámbito de la atención primaria de salud. Desde el punto de vista conceptual, Atención Primaria asume el nuevo modelo de atención primaria de salud, orientado no sólo a la curación de la enfermedad, sino también a su prevención y a la promoción de la salud, tanto en el plano individual como en el de la familia y la comunidad. En estos nuevos aspectos que definen el modelo de atención primaria de salud es en los que se centran los trabajos de investigación que publica Atención Primaria, la primera revista de originales española creada para recoger y difundir la producción científica realizada desde los centros de atención primaria de salud sobre cuestiones como protocolización de la asistencia, programas de prevención, seguimiento y control de pacientes crónicos, organización y gestión de la asistencia primaria, entre otros.
期刊最新文献
Prevención del suicidio en el entorno laboral Tratamiento farmacológico de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2 Análisis de habilidades y percepciones sobre mHealth en el manejo de pacientes crónicos por profesionales de atención primaria Calidad de la atención en podología universitaria. Análisis del cuestionario de satisfacción del paciente Tratamiento analgésico y adecuación terapéutica en los pacientes con enfermedad crónica avanzada. Oportunidades de mejora
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1