与专业药物使用治疗项目中计划使用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍相关的客户和项目层面因素:来自关联管理数据和调查数据的证据。

Kenneth A. Feder , Yuzhong Li , Kathryn N. Burke , Lauren Byrne , Isha K. Desai , Brendan Saloner , Noa Krawczyk
{"title":"与专业药物使用治疗项目中计划使用药物治疗阿片类药物使用障碍相关的客户和项目层面因素:来自关联管理数据和调查数据的证据。","authors":"Kenneth A. Feder ,&nbsp;Yuzhong Li ,&nbsp;Kathryn N. Burke ,&nbsp;Lauren Byrne ,&nbsp;Isha K. Desai ,&nbsp;Brendan Saloner ,&nbsp;Noa Krawczyk","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most patients in specialty drug treatment programs that are not federally licensed Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) programs do not receive medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We linked results from a survey of non-OTP treatment program directors in New Jersey (<em>n</em> = 81) to statewide administrative records of admissions for opioid use to those programs between July 2021–June 2022. Using multi-level regression, we examined the association of three types of factors with planned MOUD use: program survey responses, client-level factors, and program-level client characteristic mix.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 9583 opioid treatment admissions in non-OTP settings, 41 % included treatment plans involving MOUD. Programs where directors reported staff concerns about buprenorphine's efficacy or diversion had a lower proportion of clients with planned MOUD, as did programs reporting too little physical space to prescribe. Being self-referred to treatment, unemployed and not looking for work, aged 30–49, heroin use (vs. prescription opioid use), and stimulant use in addition to opioids, were positively associated with planned MOUD; while non-Medicaid insurance, and Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity, were negatively associated with planned MOUD. Clients were more likely to have planned MOUD if their programs had a higher proportion of clients aged 30 or older, heroin as primary “drug of abuse,” stimulant use, and not working but actively looking for work.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings suggest addressing program staff attitudes toward buprenorphine could help increase planned MOUD. There is also a need to improve access for clients with non-Medicaid insurance, address within-program race and ethnic disparities, and address employment-related barriers to medication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 209545"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Client and program-level factors associated with planned use of medications for opioid use disorder in specialty substance use treatment programs: Evidence from linked administrative data and survey data\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth A. Feder ,&nbsp;Yuzhong Li ,&nbsp;Kathryn N. Burke ,&nbsp;Lauren Byrne ,&nbsp;Isha K. Desai ,&nbsp;Brendan Saloner ,&nbsp;Noa Krawczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Most patients in specialty drug treatment programs that are not federally licensed Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) programs do not receive medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We linked results from a survey of non-OTP treatment program directors in New Jersey (<em>n</em> = 81) to statewide administrative records of admissions for opioid use to those programs between July 2021–June 2022. Using multi-level regression, we examined the association of three types of factors with planned MOUD use: program survey responses, client-level factors, and program-level client characteristic mix.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 9583 opioid treatment admissions in non-OTP settings, 41 % included treatment plans involving MOUD. Programs where directors reported staff concerns about buprenorphine's efficacy or diversion had a lower proportion of clients with planned MOUD, as did programs reporting too little physical space to prescribe. Being self-referred to treatment, unemployed and not looking for work, aged 30–49, heroin use (vs. prescription opioid use), and stimulant use in addition to opioids, were positively associated with planned MOUD; while non-Medicaid insurance, and Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity, were negatively associated with planned MOUD. Clients were more likely to have planned MOUD if their programs had a higher proportion of clients aged 30 or older, heroin as primary “drug of abuse,” stimulant use, and not working but actively looking for work.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Findings suggest addressing program staff attitudes toward buprenorphine could help increase planned MOUD. There is also a need to improve access for clients with non-Medicaid insurance, address within-program race and ethnic disparities, and address employment-related barriers to medication.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"Article 209545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924002571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在非联邦许可的阿片类药物治疗项目(OTPs)的专业药物治疗项目中,大多数患者都没有接受阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物治疗:我们将对新泽西州非阿片类药物治疗项目主任的调查结果(n = 81)与 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 6 月期间这些项目收治阿片类药物使用患者的全州行政记录联系起来。通过多层次回归,我们研究了三类因素与计划使用 MOUD 的关联:项目调查回复、客户层面的因素和项目层面的客户特征组合:在 9583 例非OTP 环境下接受阿片类药物治疗的患者中,41% 的患者接受了涉及 MOUD 的治疗计划。在一些项目中,主任表示员工对丁丙诺啡的疗效或转用存在顾虑,而在这些项目中,计划使用丁丙诺啡治疗的客户比例较低。自我推荐治疗、失业且不找工作、年龄在 30-49 岁之间、使用海洛因(与使用处方阿片类药物相比)以及除阿片类药物外还使用兴奋剂与计划的 MOUD 呈正相关;而非医疗补助保险以及黑人和西班牙裔种族/族裔与计划的 MOUD 呈负相关。如果项目中 30 岁或 30 岁以上、以海洛因为主要 "滥用药物"、使用兴奋剂、没有工作但正在积极找工作的受助者比例较高,则受助者更有可能有计划地进行 MOUD:研究结果表明,解决项目人员对丁丙诺啡的态度问题有助于增加计划的 MOUD。此外,还需要改善非医疗补助保险客户的使用情况,解决项目内部种族和民族差异问题,以及解决与就业相关的用药障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Client and program-level factors associated with planned use of medications for opioid use disorder in specialty substance use treatment programs: Evidence from linked administrative data and survey data

Background

Most patients in specialty drug treatment programs that are not federally licensed Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) programs do not receive medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD).

Methods

We linked results from a survey of non-OTP treatment program directors in New Jersey (n = 81) to statewide administrative records of admissions for opioid use to those programs between July 2021–June 2022. Using multi-level regression, we examined the association of three types of factors with planned MOUD use: program survey responses, client-level factors, and program-level client characteristic mix.

Results

Of 9583 opioid treatment admissions in non-OTP settings, 41 % included treatment plans involving MOUD. Programs where directors reported staff concerns about buprenorphine's efficacy or diversion had a lower proportion of clients with planned MOUD, as did programs reporting too little physical space to prescribe. Being self-referred to treatment, unemployed and not looking for work, aged 30–49, heroin use (vs. prescription opioid use), and stimulant use in addition to opioids, were positively associated with planned MOUD; while non-Medicaid insurance, and Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity, were negatively associated with planned MOUD. Clients were more likely to have planned MOUD if their programs had a higher proportion of clients aged 30 or older, heroin as primary “drug of abuse,” stimulant use, and not working but actively looking for work.

Conclusion

Findings suggest addressing program staff attitudes toward buprenorphine could help increase planned MOUD. There is also a need to improve access for clients with non-Medicaid insurance, address within-program race and ethnic disparities, and address employment-related barriers to medication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classes of outpatient quality of care among individuals with substance-related disorders, based on a survey and health insurance registry. Description of implementing a mail-based overdose education and naloxone distribution program in community supervision settings during COVID-19. Association between Comprehensive Primary Care Plus and opioid prescribing and prescription fills among Medicare beneficiaries. Text message-delivered cannabis use disorder treatment with young adults: A large randomized clinical trial. Institutional variation of smoking cessation success in Taiwan: A multi-level analysis of the National Second-Generation Tobacco Cessation Program Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1