信息提供者的特征会影响基于临床痴呆分级的阿尔茨海默病分期。

IF 19.4 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY Nature aging Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1038/s43587-024-00732-x
Juan-Camilo Vargas-Gonzalez, Antonella Santuccione Chadha, Laura Castro-Aldrete, Maria Teresa Ferretti, Maria Carmela Tartaglia
{"title":"信息提供者的特征会影响基于临床痴呆分级的阿尔茨海默病分期。","authors":"Juan-Camilo Vargas-Gonzalez, Antonella Santuccione Chadha, Laura Castro-Aldrete, Maria Teresa Ferretti, Maria Carmela Tartaglia","doi":"10.1038/s43587-024-00732-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) is a staging scale for Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1 and is commonly used as an outcome in clinical trials2. It relies on information provided by the patient and an informant3. The CDR-SB should reflect only the patient’s disease severity. However, we explored whether informant characteristics were associated with CDR-SB scores because that association might introduce bias in Alzheimer’s disease research. We found that the CDR-SB was 0.20 higher when informants were female, 0.39 higher when the informant was a patient’s child and 0.18 lower if the relationship was other than spouse or children. Regarding the frequency of contact, CDR-SB scores were 0.38 higher when contact was at least once a week, 0.65 higher when daily and 0.57 higher when living with the patient. Our analysis results suggest that informant characteristics can modify the CDR-SB scores and might introduce bias into Alzheimer’s disease trials and research. Vargas-Gonzalez et al. report an influence of informant characteristics on the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), a scale designed to stage patients with Alzheimer’s disease, which is commonly used as an outcome for clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":94150,"journal":{"name":"Nature aging","volume":"4 11","pages":"1538-1543"},"PeriodicalIF":19.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informant characteristics influence Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores-based staging of Alzheimer’s disease\",\"authors\":\"Juan-Camilo Vargas-Gonzalez, Antonella Santuccione Chadha, Laura Castro-Aldrete, Maria Teresa Ferretti, Maria Carmela Tartaglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43587-024-00732-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) is a staging scale for Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1 and is commonly used as an outcome in clinical trials2. It relies on information provided by the patient and an informant3. The CDR-SB should reflect only the patient’s disease severity. However, we explored whether informant characteristics were associated with CDR-SB scores because that association might introduce bias in Alzheimer’s disease research. We found that the CDR-SB was 0.20 higher when informants were female, 0.39 higher when the informant was a patient’s child and 0.18 lower if the relationship was other than spouse or children. Regarding the frequency of contact, CDR-SB scores were 0.38 higher when contact was at least once a week, 0.65 higher when daily and 0.57 higher when living with the patient. Our analysis results suggest that informant characteristics can modify the CDR-SB scores and might introduce bias into Alzheimer’s disease trials and research. Vargas-Gonzalez et al. report an influence of informant characteristics on the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), a scale designed to stage patients with Alzheimer’s disease, which is commonly used as an outcome for clinical trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature aging\",\"volume\":\"4 11\",\"pages\":\"1538-1543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00732-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43587-024-00732-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床痴呆评定量表(CDR-SB)是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的分期量表1 ,通常用作临床试验的结果2。它依赖于患者和信息提供者提供的信息3。CDR-SB 应仅反映患者的疾病严重程度。然而,我们探讨了信息提供者的特征是否与 CDR-SB 分数相关,因为这种关联可能会在阿尔茨海默病研究中引入偏差。我们发现,如果信息提供者是女性,则 CDR-SB 高 0.20;如果信息提供者是患者的子女,则 CDR-SB 高 0.39;如果非配偶或子女关系,则 CDR-SB 低 0.18。在接触频率方面,每周至少接触一次的 CDR-SB 得分高 0.38,每天接触的高 0.65,与患者同住的高 0.57。我们的分析结果表明,信息提供者的特征会改变 CDR-SB 的得分,并可能给阿尔茨海默病的试验和研究带来偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Informant characteristics influence Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores-based staging of Alzheimer’s disease
The Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) is a staging scale for Alzheimer’s disease (AD)1 and is commonly used as an outcome in clinical trials2. It relies on information provided by the patient and an informant3. The CDR-SB should reflect only the patient’s disease severity. However, we explored whether informant characteristics were associated with CDR-SB scores because that association might introduce bias in Alzheimer’s disease research. We found that the CDR-SB was 0.20 higher when informants were female, 0.39 higher when the informant was a patient’s child and 0.18 lower if the relationship was other than spouse or children. Regarding the frequency of contact, CDR-SB scores were 0.38 higher when contact was at least once a week, 0.65 higher when daily and 0.57 higher when living with the patient. Our analysis results suggest that informant characteristics can modify the CDR-SB scores and might introduce bias into Alzheimer’s disease trials and research. Vargas-Gonzalez et al. report an influence of informant characteristics on the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), a scale designed to stage patients with Alzheimer’s disease, which is commonly used as an outcome for clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proteomic signatures of the APOE ε4 and APOE ε2 genetic variants and Alzheimer's disease. Glutamine-driven reductive TCA cycle metabolism supports aged muscle stem cell function via de novo lipogenesis. Reduced ULK1 links impaired autophagy and mitophagy to Alzheimer's disease pathology. Mirroring tissue senescence in human biofluids. Urinary detection of therapy-induced senescence and fibrosis using an injectable albumin-based nanoprobe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1