使用单氮化丙啶处理家庭厨房洗碗海绵中的细菌微生物组的活力鉴别。

IF 3.6 4区 生物学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Microbiology Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1111/1758-2229.70006
Christina K. Carstens, Joelle K. Salazar, Shreela Sharma, Wenyaw Chan, Charles Darkoh
{"title":"使用单氮化丙啶处理家庭厨房洗碗海绵中的细菌微生物组的活力鉴别。","authors":"Christina K. Carstens,&nbsp;Joelle K. Salazar,&nbsp;Shreela Sharma,&nbsp;Wenyaw Chan,&nbsp;Charles Darkoh","doi":"10.1111/1758-2229.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dish sponges are known to support the proliferation of human bacterial pathogens, yet they are commonly used by consumers. Exposure to foodborne pathogens via sponge use may lead to illness, a serious concern among susceptible populations. The extent of exposure risks from sponge use has been limited by constraints associated with culture-independent or dependent methods for bacterial community characterization. Therefore, five used dish sponges were characterized to evaluate the presence of viable bacterial foodborne pathogens using the novel application of propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment and targeted 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Select pathogen viability was confirmed using targeted selective enrichment. The taxonomic abundance profiles of total and viable sponge microbiomes did not vary significantly. The numbers of unique bacterial species (<i>p</i> = 0.0465) and foodborne pathogens (<i>p</i> = 0.0102) identified were significantly lower in viable sponge microbiomes. Twenty unique bacterial foodborne pathogens were detected across total and viable sponge microbiomes, and three to six viable foodborne pathogens were identified in each sponge. <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> were identified in each viable sponge microbiome, and viable <i>E. coli</i> were recovered from two sponges via targeted selective enrichment. These findings suggest that sponge-associated bacterial communities are primarily viable and contain multiple viable bacterial foodborne pathogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":163,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","volume":"16 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497490/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viability discrimination of bacterial microbiomes in home kitchen dish sponges using propidium monoazide treatment\",\"authors\":\"Christina K. Carstens,&nbsp;Joelle K. Salazar,&nbsp;Shreela Sharma,&nbsp;Wenyaw Chan,&nbsp;Charles Darkoh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1758-2229.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dish sponges are known to support the proliferation of human bacterial pathogens, yet they are commonly used by consumers. Exposure to foodborne pathogens via sponge use may lead to illness, a serious concern among susceptible populations. The extent of exposure risks from sponge use has been limited by constraints associated with culture-independent or dependent methods for bacterial community characterization. Therefore, five used dish sponges were characterized to evaluate the presence of viable bacterial foodborne pathogens using the novel application of propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment and targeted 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Select pathogen viability was confirmed using targeted selective enrichment. The taxonomic abundance profiles of total and viable sponge microbiomes did not vary significantly. The numbers of unique bacterial species (<i>p</i> = 0.0465) and foodborne pathogens (<i>p</i> = 0.0102) identified were significantly lower in viable sponge microbiomes. Twenty unique bacterial foodborne pathogens were detected across total and viable sponge microbiomes, and three to six viable foodborne pathogens were identified in each sponge. <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> were identified in each viable sponge microbiome, and viable <i>E. coli</i> were recovered from two sponges via targeted selective enrichment. These findings suggest that sponge-associated bacterial communities are primarily viable and contain multiple viable bacterial foodborne pathogens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Microbiology Reports\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497490/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Microbiology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Microbiology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-2229.70006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,洗碗海绵有助于人类细菌病原体的繁殖,但消费者却经常使用它们。通过使用海绵接触食源性病原体可能会导致疾病,这是易受感染人群严重关切的问题。由于细菌群落特征描述不依赖于培养或依赖于培养的方法所带来的限制,海绵使用所带来的暴露风险程度一直很有限。因此,采用新颖的单氮化丙啶(PMA)处理方法和有针对性的 16S rRNA 基因扩增片段测序,对五种使用过的盘子海绵进行了特征描述,以评估是否存在可存活的细菌性食源性病原体。利用定向选择富集法确认了所选病原体的存活率。总海绵微生物群和可存活海绵微生物群的分类丰度分布差异不大。在有活力的海绵微生物组中,鉴定出的独特细菌物种(p = 0.0465)和食源性病原体(p = 0.0102)的数量明显较少。在所有海绵微生物组和有活力海绵微生物组中检测到 20 种独特的食源性细菌病原体,在每种海绵微生物组中发现 3 到 6 种有活力的食源性病原体。在每个有活力的海绵微生物组中都发现了大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌,并通过定向选择富集从两个海绵中回收了有活力的大肠杆菌。这些发现表明,海绵相关细菌群落主要是有活力的,并含有多种有活力的食源性细菌病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Viability discrimination of bacterial microbiomes in home kitchen dish sponges using propidium monoazide treatment

Dish sponges are known to support the proliferation of human bacterial pathogens, yet they are commonly used by consumers. Exposure to foodborne pathogens via sponge use may lead to illness, a serious concern among susceptible populations. The extent of exposure risks from sponge use has been limited by constraints associated with culture-independent or dependent methods for bacterial community characterization. Therefore, five used dish sponges were characterized to evaluate the presence of viable bacterial foodborne pathogens using the novel application of propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment and targeted 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Select pathogen viability was confirmed using targeted selective enrichment. The taxonomic abundance profiles of total and viable sponge microbiomes did not vary significantly. The numbers of unique bacterial species (p = 0.0465) and foodborne pathogens (p = 0.0102) identified were significantly lower in viable sponge microbiomes. Twenty unique bacterial foodborne pathogens were detected across total and viable sponge microbiomes, and three to six viable foodborne pathogens were identified in each sponge. Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus were identified in each viable sponge microbiome, and viable E. coli were recovered from two sponges via targeted selective enrichment. These findings suggest that sponge-associated bacterial communities are primarily viable and contain multiple viable bacterial foodborne pathogens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Microbiology Reports
Environmental Microbiology Reports ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: The journal is identical in scope to Environmental Microbiology, shares the same editorial team and submission site, and will apply the same high level acceptance criteria. The two journals will be mutually supportive and evolve side-by-side. Environmental Microbiology Reports provides a high profile vehicle for publication of the most innovative, original and rigorous research in the field. The scope of the Journal encompasses the diversity of current research on microbial processes in the environment, microbial communities, interactions and evolution and includes, but is not limited to, the following: the structure, activities and communal behaviour of microbial communities microbial community genetics and evolutionary processes microbial symbioses, microbial interactions and interactions with plants, animals and abiotic factors microbes in the tree of life, microbial diversification and evolution population biology and clonal structure microbial metabolic and structural diversity microbial physiology, growth and survival microbes and surfaces, adhesion and biofouling responses to environmental signals and stress factors modelling and theory development pollution microbiology extremophiles and life in extreme and unusual little-explored habitats element cycles and biogeochemical processes, primary and secondary production microbes in a changing world, microbially-influenced global changes evolution and diversity of archaeal and bacterial viruses new technological developments in microbial ecology and evolution, in particular for the study of activities of microbial communities, non-culturable microorganisms and emerging pathogens.
期刊最新文献
At what cost? The impact of bacteriophage resistance on the growth kinetics and protein synthesis of Escherichia coli. Metagenomic analysis reveals houseflies as indicators for monitoring environmental antibiotic resistance genes. Understanding the tolerance of halophilic archaea to stress landscapes. Increased antibiotic resistance gene abundance linked to intensive bacterial competition in the phyllosphere across an elevational gradient. 1,8-Dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) melanin provides unequal protection to black fungi Knufia petricola and Cryomyces antarcticus from UV-B radiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1