社会科学如何处理邪恶的资源关系问题?文献计量学回顾

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-25 DOI:10.1007/s12665-024-11884-9
Sabrina Kirschke, Nasir Uddin Akif
{"title":"社会科学如何处理邪恶的资源关系问题?文献计量学回顾","authors":"Sabrina Kirschke,&nbsp;Nasir Uddin Akif","doi":"10.1007/s12665-024-11884-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Environmental scholars have increasingly emphasized the role of the social sciences in addressing wicked resource nexus problems. Special attention is put on the role of policy and governance in dealing holistically with the conflicts, complexities, and uncertainties that emerge when managing resource-based sectors such as water, energy, and food. However, there is little knowledge about how this specific research area of social science-related wicked resource nexus research is characterized. Based on a bibliometric approach, we analyze (i) how the social sciences address different dimensions of wicked resource nexus problems, (ii) which specific topics this literature deals with, and (iii) how this literature is distributed over time and space. Overall, we find that the call of environmental scholars for holistic approaches has only partly been translated into the research practice. First, there is little integration in the identified dataset, going back to the dominance of individual keywords such as water or energy and only partly integrated clusters within and between dimensions. Second, there is a rather high dispersion of topics, which crystallizes among other things through a particularly high number of keywords mentioned less than five times. Third, while there is a starkly increasing diffusion of respective research over time, regional foci in Northern American and European research contexts rather persist. Based on these results, we provide potential avenues for future social science research in the field of wicked resource nexus problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"83 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do the social sciences approach wicked resource nexus problems? A bibliometric review\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Kirschke,&nbsp;Nasir Uddin Akif\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-024-11884-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Environmental scholars have increasingly emphasized the role of the social sciences in addressing wicked resource nexus problems. Special attention is put on the role of policy and governance in dealing holistically with the conflicts, complexities, and uncertainties that emerge when managing resource-based sectors such as water, energy, and food. However, there is little knowledge about how this specific research area of social science-related wicked resource nexus research is characterized. Based on a bibliometric approach, we analyze (i) how the social sciences address different dimensions of wicked resource nexus problems, (ii) which specific topics this literature deals with, and (iii) how this literature is distributed over time and space. Overall, we find that the call of environmental scholars for holistic approaches has only partly been translated into the research practice. First, there is little integration in the identified dataset, going back to the dominance of individual keywords such as water or energy and only partly integrated clusters within and between dimensions. Second, there is a rather high dispersion of topics, which crystallizes among other things through a particularly high number of keywords mentioned less than five times. Third, while there is a starkly increasing diffusion of respective research over time, regional foci in Northern American and European research contexts rather persist. Based on these results, we provide potential avenues for future social science research in the field of wicked resource nexus problems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"83 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11884-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-024-11884-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境学者越来越强调社会科学在解决邪恶的资源关系问题中的作用。他们特别关注政策和治理在全面处理冲突、复杂性和不确定性方面的作用,这些冲突、复杂性和不确定性是在管理以资源为基础的部门(如水、能源和食品)时出现的。然而,人们对与社会科学相关的邪恶资源关系研究这一特定研究领域的特点知之甚少。基于文献计量学方法,我们分析了:(i) 社会科学如何从不同层面解决邪恶资源关系问题;(ii) 这些文献涉及哪些具体主题;(iii) 这些文献在时间和空间上是如何分布的。总体而言,我们发现环境学者对整体方法的呼吁仅部分转化为研究实践。首先,在已确定的数据集中,几乎没有进行整合,这又回到了单个关键词(如水或能源)占主导地位的情况,而且只在维度内部和维度之间进行了部分整合。其次,主题的分散程度相当高,这主要体现在被提及次数少于五次的关键词数量特别多。第三,虽然随着时间的推移,各自研究的扩散性明显增强,但北美和欧洲研究背景下的地区重点却持续存在。基于这些结果,我们为今后在恶性资源关系问题领域的社会科学研究提供了潜在的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do the social sciences approach wicked resource nexus problems? A bibliometric review

Environmental scholars have increasingly emphasized the role of the social sciences in addressing wicked resource nexus problems. Special attention is put on the role of policy and governance in dealing holistically with the conflicts, complexities, and uncertainties that emerge when managing resource-based sectors such as water, energy, and food. However, there is little knowledge about how this specific research area of social science-related wicked resource nexus research is characterized. Based on a bibliometric approach, we analyze (i) how the social sciences address different dimensions of wicked resource nexus problems, (ii) which specific topics this literature deals with, and (iii) how this literature is distributed over time and space. Overall, we find that the call of environmental scholars for holistic approaches has only partly been translated into the research practice. First, there is little integration in the identified dataset, going back to the dominance of individual keywords such as water or energy and only partly integrated clusters within and between dimensions. Second, there is a rather high dispersion of topics, which crystallizes among other things through a particularly high number of keywords mentioned less than five times. Third, while there is a starkly increasing diffusion of respective research over time, regional foci in Northern American and European research contexts rather persist. Based on these results, we provide potential avenues for future social science research in the field of wicked resource nexus problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the performance of machine learning models for predicting soil organic carbon variability across diverse landforms Geostatistical analysis and interpretation of Ilesha aeromagnetic data south–western, Nigeria Application of remote sensing image processing based on artificial intelligence in landscape pattern analysis ResNet50 in remote sensing and agriculture: evaluating image captioning performance for high spectral data Research on microstructure and porosity calculation of rammed soil modified by lime-based materials: the case of rammed earth of pingyao city wall, a world heritage site
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1