舒降之对使用视频辅助胸腔手术治疗的肺癌患者术后肺部并发症和快速康复的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annali italiani di chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62713/aic.3547
Tianhao Song, Lingxi Xing, Yuyan Ding, Xiaolan Gu, Rong Gao, Lei Qiu, Lianbing Gu
{"title":"舒降之对使用视频辅助胸腔手术治疗的肺癌患者术后肺部并发症和快速康复的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Tianhao Song, Lingxi Xing, Yuyan Ding, Xiaolan Gu, Rong Gao, Lei Qiu, Lianbing Gu","doi":"10.62713/aic.3547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of sugammadex on postoperative pulmonary complications and rapid recovery in lung cancer patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 1131 lung cancer patients. Of these, 631 patients received sugammadex at the end of anesthesia, while 500 patients did not. To mitigate potential confounding factors, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed at a 1:1 ratio. After matching, 435 patients were obtained from each group. Patients who received sugammadex at the end of anesthesia were classified into Group S (n = 435) and those who did not receive sugammadex were Group P (n = 435). Postoperative pulmonary complications, indicators of recovery after surgery, nausea and vomiting, pain and lung infection scores and biochemical indices were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to Group P, Group S demonstrated statistically significant improvements across multiple perioperative and postoperative outcomes. Group S exhibited a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (χ2 = 9.52, p = 0.002), as well as reduced durations for several key time intervals: from the cessation of muscle relaxation to extubation (Z = 12.96, p < 0.001), from the conclusion of surgery to extubation (Z = 13.66, p < 0.001), and total operating theatre occupancy (Z = 5.81, p < 0.001). Furthermore, Group S showed accelerated recovery in terms of time to first oral intake (drink: Z = 3.80, p < 0.001; eat: Z = 3.80, p < 0.001), time to defecate (Z = 3.25, p = 0.001), and time to chest tube removal (Z = 5.04, p < 0.001). Pain management outcomes were also superior in Group S, with lower motor visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at both 24 h (Z = 4.71, p < 0.001) and 48 h (Z = 5.05, p < 0.001) postoperatively. Group S additionally demonstrated a lower modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (mCPIS) (Z = 4.68, p < 0.001), reduced complication rates during the general anesthesia awakening period (χ2 = 23.54, p < 0.001), and a lower incidence of renal function abnormalities (χ2 =12.65, p < 0.001). Certain parameters, including total hospital stay duration and postoperative drainage volume, did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sugammadex can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer patients treated with VATS, and help promote their rapid postoperative recovery with significant clinical benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":8210,"journal":{"name":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","volume":"95 5","pages":"963-971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Sugammadex on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Rapid Recovery in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tianhao Song, Lingxi Xing, Yuyan Ding, Xiaolan Gu, Rong Gao, Lei Qiu, Lianbing Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.62713/aic.3547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effects of sugammadex on postoperative pulmonary complications and rapid recovery in lung cancer patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 1131 lung cancer patients. Of these, 631 patients received sugammadex at the end of anesthesia, while 500 patients did not. To mitigate potential confounding factors, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed at a 1:1 ratio. After matching, 435 patients were obtained from each group. Patients who received sugammadex at the end of anesthesia were classified into Group S (n = 435) and those who did not receive sugammadex were Group P (n = 435). Postoperative pulmonary complications, indicators of recovery after surgery, nausea and vomiting, pain and lung infection scores and biochemical indices were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to Group P, Group S demonstrated statistically significant improvements across multiple perioperative and postoperative outcomes. Group S exhibited a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (χ2 = 9.52, p = 0.002), as well as reduced durations for several key time intervals: from the cessation of muscle relaxation to extubation (Z = 12.96, p < 0.001), from the conclusion of surgery to extubation (Z = 13.66, p < 0.001), and total operating theatre occupancy (Z = 5.81, p < 0.001). Furthermore, Group S showed accelerated recovery in terms of time to first oral intake (drink: Z = 3.80, p < 0.001; eat: Z = 3.80, p < 0.001), time to defecate (Z = 3.25, p = 0.001), and time to chest tube removal (Z = 5.04, p < 0.001). Pain management outcomes were also superior in Group S, with lower motor visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at both 24 h (Z = 4.71, p < 0.001) and 48 h (Z = 5.05, p < 0.001) postoperatively. Group S additionally demonstrated a lower modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (mCPIS) (Z = 4.68, p < 0.001), reduced complication rates during the general anesthesia awakening period (χ2 = 23.54, p < 0.001), and a lower incidence of renal function abnormalities (χ2 =12.65, p < 0.001). Certain parameters, including total hospital stay duration and postoperative drainage volume, did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sugammadex can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer patients treated with VATS, and help promote their rapid postoperative recovery with significant clinical benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"volume\":\"95 5\",\"pages\":\"963-971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annali italiani di chirurgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3547\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali italiani di chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62713/aic.3547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨舒降之对接受视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的肺癌患者术后肺部并发症和快速康复的影响:方法:对1131名肺癌患者的临床数据进行了回顾性分析。其中,631 名患者在麻醉结束时接受了苏麦卡,500 名患者没有接受。为了减少潜在的混杂因素,研究人员采用了倾向得分匹配法(PSM),比例为 1:1。匹配后,每组各有 435 名患者。麻醉结束后接受舒格迈司治疗的患者被分为S组(435人),未接受舒格迈司治疗的患者被分为P组(435人)。比较两组的术后肺部并发症、术后恢复指标、恶心呕吐、疼痛和肺部感染评分以及生化指标:结果:与 P 组相比,S 组在多个围手术期和术后结果方面都有统计学意义上的显著改善。S 组术后肺部并发症发生率较低(χ2 = 9.52,P = 0.002),几个关键时间间隔的持续时间也有所缩短:从肌肉松弛停止到拔管(Z = 12.96,P < 0.001),从手术结束到拔管(Z = 13.66,P < 0.001),以及手术室总占用时间(Z = 5.81,P < 0.001)。此外,S 组在首次进食时间(喝:Z = 3.80,p < 0.001;吃:Z = 3.80,p < 0.001)、排便时间(Z = 3.25,p = 0.001)和拔除胸管时间(Z = 5.04,p < 0.001)方面的恢复速度更快。S 组的疼痛治疗效果也更好,术后 24 小时(Z = 4.71,p < 0.001)和 48 小时(Z = 5.05,p < 0.001)的运动视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分都更低。此外,S 组的改良临床肺部感染评分(mCPIS)较低(Z = 4.68,p < 0.001),全身麻醉苏醒期并发症发生率较低(χ2 = 23.54,p < 0.001),肾功能异常发生率较低(χ2 = 12.65,p < 0.001)。某些参数,包括总住院时间和术后引流量,在两组之间没有显著差异(P > 0.05):舒降之可有效降低VATS治疗肺癌患者术后肺部并发症的发生率,促进患者术后快速康复,临床疗效显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Sugammadex on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Rapid Recovery in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the effects of sugammadex on postoperative pulmonary complications and rapid recovery in lung cancer patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 1131 lung cancer patients. Of these, 631 patients received sugammadex at the end of anesthesia, while 500 patients did not. To mitigate potential confounding factors, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed at a 1:1 ratio. After matching, 435 patients were obtained from each group. Patients who received sugammadex at the end of anesthesia were classified into Group S (n = 435) and those who did not receive sugammadex were Group P (n = 435). Postoperative pulmonary complications, indicators of recovery after surgery, nausea and vomiting, pain and lung infection scores and biochemical indices were compared between the two groups.

Results: Compared to Group P, Group S demonstrated statistically significant improvements across multiple perioperative and postoperative outcomes. Group S exhibited a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (χ2 = 9.52, p = 0.002), as well as reduced durations for several key time intervals: from the cessation of muscle relaxation to extubation (Z = 12.96, p < 0.001), from the conclusion of surgery to extubation (Z = 13.66, p < 0.001), and total operating theatre occupancy (Z = 5.81, p < 0.001). Furthermore, Group S showed accelerated recovery in terms of time to first oral intake (drink: Z = 3.80, p < 0.001; eat: Z = 3.80, p < 0.001), time to defecate (Z = 3.25, p = 0.001), and time to chest tube removal (Z = 5.04, p < 0.001). Pain management outcomes were also superior in Group S, with lower motor visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at both 24 h (Z = 4.71, p < 0.001) and 48 h (Z = 5.05, p < 0.001) postoperatively. Group S additionally demonstrated a lower modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (mCPIS) (Z = 4.68, p < 0.001), reduced complication rates during the general anesthesia awakening period (χ2 = 23.54, p < 0.001), and a lower incidence of renal function abnormalities (χ2 =12.65, p < 0.001). Certain parameters, including total hospital stay duration and postoperative drainage volume, did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Sugammadex can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in lung cancer patients treated with VATS, and help promote their rapid postoperative recovery with significant clinical benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annali Italiani di Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal and covers all aspects of surgery:elective, emergency and experimental surgery, as well as problems involving technology, teaching, organization and forensic medicine. The articles are published in Italian or English, though English is preferred because it facilitates the international diffusion of the journal (v.Guidelines for Authors and Norme per gli Autori). The articles published are divided into three main sections:editorials, original articles, and case reports and innovations.
期刊最新文献
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Esophagus with Lung Metastasis: Case Report. Adrenocortical Adenoma Arising from Adrenohepatic Fusion: A Mimic of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Case Report. Application Evaluation of Fluorouracil Intraperitoneal Perfusion Chemotherapy in Combination with Intravenous Chemotherapy in Patients after Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer. Comparison of Hem-o-lok and Endoloop for Appendiceal Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: An Observational Retrospective Study. Comparison of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression and Full Endoscopic Lamina Fenestration Decompression in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Unilateral Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1