医疗服务提供者和肥胖症患者的抗肥胖治疗偏好:一项基于调查的研究。

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI:10.1111/cob.12704
Carel W Le Roux, Anna Koroleva, Sara Larsen, Ellie Foot
{"title":"医疗服务提供者和肥胖症患者的抗肥胖治疗偏好:一项基于调查的研究。","authors":"Carel W Le Roux, Anna Koroleva, Sara Larsen, Ellie Foot","doi":"10.1111/cob.12704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A cross-sectional, online survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the United States (14 November-22 December 2022) to investigate preferences for anti-obesity medication (AOM) among people with obesity (PwO) and healthcare providers (HCPs). Eligibility: Adult PwO who self-defined their body type as overweight/obese, were trying to lose weight and had BMI ≥30.0 or 27.0-29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with ≥1 obesity-related complication; HCPs had to see ≥30 PwO in a typical month and be a decision-maker regarding their weight loss. The survey included 2500 PwO and 500 HCPs. Exercise (96%) and diet (90%) were the most common weight management methods; AOM use was low (8%). Key barriers to use of prescribed AOMs among PwO were not wanting to take AOM (34%), side effects concerns (33%), and not trusting AOM (26%). Most HCPs (79%) had prescribed/recommended AOMs. Efficacy was the most common reason for preferring one of the shown product profiles among PwO (60%) and HCPs (86%); improving cardiovascular risk was also important to 95% of HCPs when deciding which AOM to prescribe. AOM preference is largely driven by efficacy. Increasing knowledge could help to address barriers to AOM use and improve outcomes for PwO.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"e12704"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-obesity treatment preferences of healthcare providers and people living with obesity: A survey-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Carel W Le Roux, Anna Koroleva, Sara Larsen, Ellie Foot\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cob.12704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A cross-sectional, online survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the United States (14 November-22 December 2022) to investigate preferences for anti-obesity medication (AOM) among people with obesity (PwO) and healthcare providers (HCPs). Eligibility: Adult PwO who self-defined their body type as overweight/obese, were trying to lose weight and had BMI ≥30.0 or 27.0-29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with ≥1 obesity-related complication; HCPs had to see ≥30 PwO in a typical month and be a decision-maker regarding their weight loss. The survey included 2500 PwO and 500 HCPs. Exercise (96%) and diet (90%) were the most common weight management methods; AOM use was low (8%). Key barriers to use of prescribed AOMs among PwO were not wanting to take AOM (34%), side effects concerns (33%), and not trusting AOM (26%). Most HCPs (79%) had prescribed/recommended AOMs. Efficacy was the most common reason for preferring one of the shown product profiles among PwO (60%) and HCPs (86%); improving cardiovascular risk was also important to 95% of HCPs when deciding which AOM to prescribe. AOM preference is largely driven by efficacy. Increasing knowledge could help to address barriers to AOM use and improve outcomes for PwO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e12704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们在英国、法国、德国和美国开展了一项横断面在线调查(2022 年 11 月 14 日至 12 月 22 日),调查肥胖症患者(PwO)和医疗保健提供者(HCPs)对抗肥胖药物(AOM)的偏好。资格:自我定义体型为超重/肥胖、正在努力减肥且体重指数(BMI)≥30.0 或 27.0-29.9 kg/m2,并伴有≥1 种肥胖相关并发症的成年肥胖症患者;医护人员必须在一个月内接诊≥30 名肥胖症患者,并且是他们减肥的决策者。调查对象包括 2500 名患者和 500 名保健医生。运动(96%)和饮食(90%)是最常见的体重控制方法;AOM 的使用率较低(8%)。患者使用处方AOM的主要障碍是不想服用AOM(34%)、担心副作用(33%)和不信任AOM(26%)。大多数保健医生(79%)曾处方/推荐过 AOM。疗效是患者(60%)和保健医生(86%)偏好所显示的产品特征之一的最常见原因;95%的保健医生在决定处方哪种 AOM 时,改善心血管风险也很重要。对 AOM 的偏好在很大程度上取决于其疗效。增加对AOM的了解有助于消除使用AOM的障碍,改善普通人的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anti-obesity treatment preferences of healthcare providers and people living with obesity: A survey-based study.

A cross-sectional, online survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the United States (14 November-22 December 2022) to investigate preferences for anti-obesity medication (AOM) among people with obesity (PwO) and healthcare providers (HCPs). Eligibility: Adult PwO who self-defined their body type as overweight/obese, were trying to lose weight and had BMI ≥30.0 or 27.0-29.9 kg/m2 with ≥1 obesity-related complication; HCPs had to see ≥30 PwO in a typical month and be a decision-maker regarding their weight loss. The survey included 2500 PwO and 500 HCPs. Exercise (96%) and diet (90%) were the most common weight management methods; AOM use was low (8%). Key barriers to use of prescribed AOMs among PwO were not wanting to take AOM (34%), side effects concerns (33%), and not trusting AOM (26%). Most HCPs (79%) had prescribed/recommended AOMs. Efficacy was the most common reason for preferring one of the shown product profiles among PwO (60%) and HCPs (86%); improving cardiovascular risk was also important to 95% of HCPs when deciding which AOM to prescribe. AOM preference is largely driven by efficacy. Increasing knowledge could help to address barriers to AOM use and improve outcomes for PwO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
期刊最新文献
Effect of the National Enhanced Service for weight management on the content of annual review consultations for patients living with obesity and hypertension and/or diabetes. Issue Information A cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the efficacy of family-centred obesity management program in primary care settings: A study protocol. Effect of interdisciplinary obesity care on metabolic markers and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes in a rural setting: A randomised controlled trial. Improving obesity management: Insights from the ACTION Switzerland survey of people with obesity, physicians and dietitians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1