Michelle A J van Oeteren, Nynke Simons, Pomme I H G Simons, Marjo P H van de Waarenburg, M Eline Kooi, Edith J M Feskens, E M C Liesbeth van der Ploeg, Mathias D G Van den Eynde, Alfons J H M Houben, Casper G Schalkwijk, Martijn C G J Brouwers
{"title":"果糖限制对脂肪组织分布有好处,但对血清脂肪因子水平没有影响:一项双盲随机对照试验的事后分析。","authors":"Michelle A J van Oeteren, Nynke Simons, Pomme I H G Simons, Marjo P H van de Waarenburg, M Eline Kooi, Edith J M Feskens, E M C Liesbeth van der Ploeg, Mathias D G Van den Eynde, Alfons J H M Houben, Casper G Schalkwijk, Martijn C G J Brouwers","doi":"10.1111/cob.12714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We aimed to examine the effects of isocaloric fructose restriction on adipose tissue distribution and serum adipokines. Individuals with BMI >28 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (n = 44) followed a 6-week fructose-restricted diet and were randomly allocated to (double-blind) oral supplementation with fructose (control) or glucose (intervention) powder three times daily. Visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) adipose tissue was quantified with MRI. Serum interleukin 6 and 8, tumour necrosis factor alpha and adiponectin levels were measured with sandwich immunoassay. BMI decreased in both groups, but the change did not differ between groups (-0.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95%CI: -0.3; 0.5). SAT decreased statistically significantly in the control group (-23.2 cm<sup>3</sup>, 95%CI: -49.4; -4.1), but not in the intervention group. The change in SAT did not differ between groups (29.6 cm<sup>3</sup>, 95%CI: -1.2; 61.8). No significant differences in VAT were observed within or between study arms. The VAT/SAT ratio decreased statistically significantly in the intervention group (-0.02, 95%CI: -0.04; -0.003) and the change was significantly different between groups (-0.03, 95%CI: -0.54; -0.003). Serum adipokine levels were not affected by the intervention. This study shows that a fructose-restricted diet resulted in a favourable change in adipose tissue distribution, but did not affect serum adipokines. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying mechanisms how fructose affects adipose tissue distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"e12714"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fructose restriction has beneficial effects on adipose tissue distribution but not on serum adipokine levels: Post-hoc analysis of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle A J van Oeteren, Nynke Simons, Pomme I H G Simons, Marjo P H van de Waarenburg, M Eline Kooi, Edith J M Feskens, E M C Liesbeth van der Ploeg, Mathias D G Van den Eynde, Alfons J H M Houben, Casper G Schalkwijk, Martijn C G J Brouwers\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cob.12714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We aimed to examine the effects of isocaloric fructose restriction on adipose tissue distribution and serum adipokines. Individuals with BMI >28 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (n = 44) followed a 6-week fructose-restricted diet and were randomly allocated to (double-blind) oral supplementation with fructose (control) or glucose (intervention) powder three times daily. Visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) adipose tissue was quantified with MRI. Serum interleukin 6 and 8, tumour necrosis factor alpha and adiponectin levels were measured with sandwich immunoassay. BMI decreased in both groups, but the change did not differ between groups (-0.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 95%CI: -0.3; 0.5). SAT decreased statistically significantly in the control group (-23.2 cm<sup>3</sup>, 95%CI: -49.4; -4.1), but not in the intervention group. The change in SAT did not differ between groups (29.6 cm<sup>3</sup>, 95%CI: -1.2; 61.8). No significant differences in VAT were observed within or between study arms. The VAT/SAT ratio decreased statistically significantly in the intervention group (-0.02, 95%CI: -0.04; -0.003) and the change was significantly different between groups (-0.03, 95%CI: -0.54; -0.003). Serum adipokine levels were not affected by the intervention. This study shows that a fructose-restricted diet resulted in a favourable change in adipose tissue distribution, but did not affect serum adipokines. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying mechanisms how fructose affects adipose tissue distribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e12714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们旨在研究等热量果糖限制对脂肪组织分布和血清脂肪因子的影响。体重指数大于 28 kg/m2 的个体(n = 44)接受了为期 6 周的果糖限制饮食,并随机分配到(双盲)每天三次口服果糖粉(对照组)或葡萄糖粉(干预组)。通过核磁共振成像对内脏(VAT)和皮下(SAT)脂肪组织进行量化。血清白细胞介素 6 和 8、肿瘤坏死因子 alpha 和脂肪连素水平采用夹心免疫测定法进行测量。两组的体重指数均有所下降,但组间变化无差异(-0.1 kg/m2,95%CI:-0.3;0.5)。对照组的 SAT 有明显的统计学下降(-23.2 立方厘米,95%CI:-49.4;-4.1),但干预组的 SAT 没有下降。干预组与对照组的 SAT 变化无差异(29.6 立方厘米,95%CI:-1.2;61.8)。研究臂内或研究臂间的 VAT 均无明显差异。干预组的 VAT/SAT 比值在统计学上有显著下降(-0.02,95%CI:-0.04;-0.003),组间变化有显著差异(-0.03,95%CI:-0.54;-0.003)。血清脂肪因子水平不受干预措施的影响。这项研究表明,果糖限制饮食会导致脂肪组织分布发生有利变化,但不会影响血清脂肪因子。要弄清果糖影响脂肪组织分布的内在机制,还需要进一步的研究。
Fructose restriction has beneficial effects on adipose tissue distribution but not on serum adipokine levels: Post-hoc analysis of a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
We aimed to examine the effects of isocaloric fructose restriction on adipose tissue distribution and serum adipokines. Individuals with BMI >28 kg/m2 (n = 44) followed a 6-week fructose-restricted diet and were randomly allocated to (double-blind) oral supplementation with fructose (control) or glucose (intervention) powder three times daily. Visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) adipose tissue was quantified with MRI. Serum interleukin 6 and 8, tumour necrosis factor alpha and adiponectin levels were measured with sandwich immunoassay. BMI decreased in both groups, but the change did not differ between groups (-0.1 kg/m2, 95%CI: -0.3; 0.5). SAT decreased statistically significantly in the control group (-23.2 cm3, 95%CI: -49.4; -4.1), but not in the intervention group. The change in SAT did not differ between groups (29.6 cm3, 95%CI: -1.2; 61.8). No significant differences in VAT were observed within or between study arms. The VAT/SAT ratio decreased statistically significantly in the intervention group (-0.02, 95%CI: -0.04; -0.003) and the change was significantly different between groups (-0.03, 95%CI: -0.54; -0.003). Serum adipokine levels were not affected by the intervention. This study shows that a fructose-restricted diet resulted in a favourable change in adipose tissue distribution, but did not affect serum adipokines. Further studies are warranted to clarify the underlying mechanisms how fructose affects adipose tissue distribution.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.